Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights in Weak Appropriability Regimes

Many emerging economies are characterised by weak appropriability systems and absent legal systems to punish imitators. This places foreign firms’ intellectual property rights at risk, because existing appropriation methods, such as patents or secrecy, cannot function effectively. This concern especially applies to China, the empirical context of this article. Such adverse conditions force managers to devise new strategies to safeguard their firms’ intellectual property rights. Yet no evidence describes whether strategies exist, which forms they take, how they have evolved or how they get implemented.This article addresses this knowledge gap and explores strategies that managers have developed to achieve de facto protection, despite China’s weak appropriability system. The analysis systematically explores 13 cases of foreign firms with wholly owned subsidiaries in China.The findings confirm that de facto strategies exist, describe how they work and detail how they were achieved. The findings suggest implications for both managers and academics.

[1]  R. Reed,et al.  Causal Ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage , 1990 .

[2]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[3]  Israel D. Nebenzahl,et al.  Strategic options of home country firms faced with MNC entry , 2005 .

[4]  R. Nelson,et al.  Economic Theories about the Benefits and Costs of Patents , 1998 .

[5]  Amy Jocelyn Glass,et al.  Intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment , 2002 .

[6]  Nitin Pangarkar,et al.  Rising to the global challenge: Strategies for firms in emerging markets , 2006 .

[7]  Ove Granstrand,et al.  The economics and management of intellectual property : towards intellectual capitalism , 1999 .

[8]  Michael J. Earl,et al.  Knowledge Management Strategies: Toward a Taxonomy , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  D. Teece Strategies for Managing Knowledge Assets: the Role of Firm Structure and Industrial Context , 2000 .

[10]  Wilfried R. Vanhonacker,et al.  Operating a foreign-invested enterprise in China: challenges for managers and management researchers , 1999 .

[11]  K. Blind,et al.  Motives to patent: Empirical evidence from Germany , 2006 .

[12]  Clarence K. Kwan,et al.  The seven disciplines for venturing in China , 2006 .

[13]  J. Watal Intellectual property rights in the WTO and developing contries , 2001 .

[14]  Deli Yang,et al.  Intellectual Property Abuses: How should Multinationals Respond? , 2004 .

[15]  E. Mansfield,et al.  Imitation Costs and Patents: An Empirical Study , 1981 .

[16]  A. Arundel,et al.  What percentage of innovations are patented? empirical estimates for European firms , 1998 .

[17]  P. Robertson,et al.  World investment report 2005: Transnational corporations and the internationalization of R&D , 2007 .

[18]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis,et al.  The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U , 2001 .

[19]  Deli Yang,et al.  Intellectual property law, technology flow and licensing opportunities in the People's Republic of China , 2000 .

[20]  S. Katayama,et al.  Intellectual Property Rights Protection and Imitation: An Empirical Examination of Japanese F.D.I. in China , 2005 .

[21]  U. Zander Exploiting a technical edge : voluntary and involuntary dissemination of technology , 1991 .

[22]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[23]  Brent B. Allred,et al.  Patent rights and innovative activity: evidence from national and firm-level data , 2007 .

[24]  Alexander Galetovic,et al.  How market smarts can protect property rights. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[25]  N. Harabi,et al.  Appropriability of technical innovations an empirical analysis , 1995 .

[26]  D. Mowery,et al.  Inward technology transfer and competitiveness: the role of national innovation systems , 1995 .

[27]  D. Teece Managing Intellectual Capital , 2002 .

[28]  T. Richards,et al.  Intellectual Property Rights: Global Consensus, Global Conflict? , 1988 .

[29]  Pamela J. D. Smith How do foreign patent rights affect U.S. exports, affiliate sales, and licenses? , 2001 .

[30]  J. Carroll Intellectual Property Rights in the Middle East: A Cultural Perspective , 2001 .

[31]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[32]  W. E. Siebeck,et al.  Strengthening Protection of Intellectual Property in Developing Countries: A Survey of the Literature , 1990 .

[33]  E. Mansfield Patents and Innovation: An Empirical Study , 1986 .

[34]  H. Volger WIPO – World Intellectual Property Organization , 2010 .

[35]  Keith E. Maskus,et al.  How trade-related are intellectual property rights? , 1995 .

[36]  K Forbes,et al.  In theory and practice. , 1993, Clinical nurse specialist CNS.

[37]  O. Granstrand The Economics and Management of Intellectual Property , 1999 .

[38]  Amitava Chattopadhyay,et al.  Rethinking Marketing Programs for Emerging Markets , 2002 .

[39]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[40]  David M. Gould,et al.  The role of intellectual property rights in economic growth , 1996 .

[41]  D. Konan,et al.  Intellectual Property Rights in China: The Changing Political Economy of Chinese-American Interests , 2002 .

[42]  P. Feng Intellectual property in China , 1997 .

[43]  Guido Möllering,et al.  Special Issue: Trust in an Organizational Context: Contextual Confidence and Active Trust Development in the Chinese Business Environment , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[44]  Henrik Sattler,et al.  Appropriability of product innovations: an empirical analysis for Germany , 2003, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[45]  Douglas C. Lippoldt,et al.  International licensing and the strengthening of intellectual property rights in developing countries during the 1990s , 2005 .

[46]  Yadong Luo Guanxi and Business , 2000 .

[47]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States , 2002 .

[48]  Brandt J C Pasco Technology transfer in a Ricardian mode: Chinese technological “Osmosis” in theory and practice , 1998 .

[49]  D. Teece Managing Intellectual Capital: Organizational, Strategic, and Policy Dimensions , 2000 .

[50]  Susan K. Sell Power and Ideas: North-South Politics of Intellectual Property and Antitrust , 1997 .

[51]  L. Melin,et al.  Micro Strategy and Strategizing: Towards an Activity‐Based View , 2003 .

[52]  Peter W. Liesch,et al.  An unconventional approach to intellectual property protection: the case of an Australian firm transferring shipbuilding technologies to China , 2000 .

[53]  Walter G. Park,et al.  INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH , 1997 .

[54]  Joshua Lerner,et al.  Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken Patent System is Endangering Innovation and Progress, and What to Do About It , 2011 .