Visualizing Revision: Leveraging Student-Generated Between-Draft Diagramming Data in Support of Academic Writing Development

Once writers complete a first draft, they are often encouraged to evaluate their writing and prioritize what to revise. Yet, this process can be both daunting and difficult. This study looks at how students used a semantic concept mapping tool to re-present the content and organization of their initial draft of an informational text. We examine the processes of students at two different schools as they remediated their own texts and how those processes impacted the development of their rhetorical, conceptual, and communicative capacities. Our analysis suggests that students creating visualizations of their completed first drafts scaffolded self-evaluation. The mapping tool aided visualization by converting compositions into discrete persistent visual data elements that represented concepts and connections. This often led to students’ meta-awareness of what was missing or misaligned in their draft. Our findings have implications for how students approach, educators perceive, and designers support the drafting and revision process.

[1]  Mary Kalantzis,et al.  Towards a Semantic web: Connecting Knowledge in Academic Research, Bill Cope, Mary Kalantzis, Liam Magee. Chandos Publishing, Oxford (2011), 525 p. $110.00, ISBN: 978-1-84334-601-2 , 2011 .

[2]  Sigmar-Olaf Tergan,et al.  Knowledge and Information Visualization, Searching for Synergies [outcome of a workshop held in Tübingen, Germany, May 2004] , 2005, Knowledge and Information Visualization.

[3]  Stephen Graham,et al.  Explicitly Teaching Strategies, Skills, and Knowledge: Writing Instruction in Middle School Classrooms. , 2002 .

[4]  Claudia S. Dybdahl,et al.  The impact of the computer on writing: no simple answers , 1997 .

[5]  N. Sommers Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Experienced Adult Writers , 1980, College Composition & Communication.

[6]  J. Hayes A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. , 1996 .

[7]  Ryan Singh Paul,et al.  A Review of “Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge: Concept Maps as Facilitative Tools in Schools and Corporation” , 2012, Inf. Soc..

[8]  Nancie Atwell In the middle : a lifetime of learning about writing, reading, and adolescents , 2015 .

[9]  Lucile Chanquoy,et al.  Revision : cognitive and instructional processes , 2004 .

[10]  J. Emig Writing as a Mode of Learning. , 1977 .

[11]  Joan Hart,et al.  Cognitive Mapping and Word Processing: Aids to Story Revision. , 1990 .

[12]  Donna E. Alvermann,et al.  A classroom training study: The effects of graphic organizer instruction on fourth graders’ comprehension , 1984 .

[13]  Elizabeth Bagley,et al.  Science in Writing: Learning Scientific Argument in Principle and Practice , 2013 .

[14]  Vicki Spandel,et al.  In Defense of Rubrics , 2006 .

[15]  Saskia Brand-Gruwel,et al.  Effects of electronic outlining on students' argumentative writing performance , 2011, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[16]  Paul A Prior,et al.  Exploring semiotic remediation as discourse practice , 2010 .

[17]  D. Ausubel,et al.  In Defense of Advance Organizers: A Reply to the Critics* , 1978 .

[18]  M. Lecompte,et al.  Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Research , 1984 .

[19]  J. Osborne,et al.  Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms , 2000 .

[20]  K. Knorr-Cetina,et al.  Epistemic cultures : how the sciences make knowledge , 1999 .

[21]  Barbara L. Grabowski,et al.  Handbook of Design in Educational Technology , 2013 .

[22]  Alecia Marie Magnifico,et al.  Supporting Teacher Metacognition about Formative Assessment in Online Writing Environments , 2013 .

[23]  N. Ann Chenoweth,et al.  Is Working Memory Involved in the Transcribing and Editing of Texts? , 2006 .

[24]  Larry Beason,et al.  Feedback and Revision in Writing across the Curriculum Classes , 1993, Research in the Teaching of English.

[25]  Paul Prior A Sociocultural Theory of Writing. , 2005 .

[26]  J. Novak,et al.  Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View , 1969 .

[27]  Amie Goldberg,et al.  The Effect of Computers on Student Writing: A Meta-analysis of Studies from 1992 to 2002 , 2003 .

[28]  J. Rule [The practice of writing]. , 1997, Rivista dell'infermiere.

[29]  Ryen W. White,et al.  No clicks, no problem: using cursor movements to understand and improve search , 2011, CHI.

[30]  R. Weiss Learning from strangers : the art and method of qualitative interview studies , 1995 .

[31]  Shelbie D. Witte,et al.  Preaching What We Practice: A Study of Revision , 2013 .

[32]  L. Flower Detection, Diagnosis, and the Strategies of Revision , 1986, College Composition & Communication.

[33]  C. MacArthur,et al.  Student revision with peer and expert reviewing , 2010 .

[34]  J. Hayes,et al.  A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing , 1981, College Composition & Communication.

[35]  Vicki Spandel,et al.  Speaking My Mind: In Defense of Rubrics , 2006 .

[36]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[37]  James Paul Gee,et al.  Language in the Science Classroom: Academic Social Languages as the Heart of School-Based Literacy , 2004 .

[38]  D. Delyser Teaching Graduate Students to Write: A seminar for thesis and dissertation writers , 2003 .

[39]  Charles A. MacArthur,et al.  Handbook of Writing Research , 2005 .

[40]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Chapter 7: Cognitive Technologies for Writing , 1987 .

[41]  Sigmar-Olaf Tergan,et al.  Digital Concept Maps for Managing Knowledge and Information , 2005, Knowledge and Information Visualization.

[42]  S. Fagerhaugh,et al.  Participant Observation , 1979 .

[43]  J M Lauritsen,et al.  [Data collection and analysis]. , 1999, Ugeskrift for laeger.

[44]  Diana C. Rice,et al.  Using Concept Maps to Assess Student Learning in the Science Classroom: Must Different Methods Compete?. , 1998 .

[45]  Michael J. Hannafin,et al.  The Effects of Word Processing on Written Composition , 1987 .

[46]  Teresa Limpo,et al.  Children's high-level writing skills: development of planning and revising and their contribution to writing quality. , 2014, The British journal of educational psychology.

[47]  M. Josephine Ellis Peer feedback on writing: Is on-line actually better than on-paper? , 2011 .

[48]  James Paul Gee,et al.  话语分析入门 : 理论与方法 = An introduction to discourse analysis : theory and method , 1999 .

[49]  D. Ausubel The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. , 1963 .

[50]  Judith A. Langer,et al.  The State of Writing Instruction in America's Schools: What Existing Data Tell Us. , 2006 .

[51]  Anne Haas Dyson,et al.  On Saying It Right (Write): "Fix-Its" in the Foundations of Learning to Write. , 2006 .

[52]  Anne Ruggles Gere,et al.  Talking About Writing: The Language of Writing Groups. , 1985 .

[53]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  The psychology of written composition , 1987 .

[54]  Harry F. Wolcott The Art of Fieldwork , 1995 .

[55]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Middle School Students’ Writing and Feedback in a Cloud-Based Classroom Environment , 2015, Technol. Knowl. Learn..

[56]  Debra Myhill,et al.  More Than Just Error Correction , 2007 .

[57]  S. Abrams,et al.  Constellations of Support and Impediment: Understanding Early Implementation Dynamics in the Research and Development of an Online Multimodal Writing and Peer Review Environment , 2013 .

[58]  Sarah W. Beck Individual Goals and Academic Literacy: Integrating Authenticity and Explicitness. , 2009 .

[59]  Danae Romrell,et al.  The SAMR Model as a Framework for Evaluating mLearning , 2014 .

[60]  V. Anfara,et al.  Qualitative Analysis on Stage: Making the Research Process More Public , 2002 .

[61]  J. Novak,et al.  The theory underlying concept maps , 2016 .

[62]  Friedrich W. Hesse,et al.  How digital concept maps about the collaborators’ knowledge and information influence computer-supported collaborative problem solving , 2010, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[63]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  Learning How to Learn , 1984 .

[64]  Margaret Diane LeCompte Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Research, 2nd Edition , 1993 .

[65]  Carol Berkenkotter,et al.  Understanding a Writer’s Awareness of Audience , 1981, College Composition & Communication.

[66]  H. Andrade The Effects of Instructional Rubrics on Learning to Write , 2001 .

[67]  R. Emerson,et al.  Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes , 1995 .

[68]  Raffaella Negretti,et al.  Metacognition in Student Academic Writing , 2012 .

[69]  B. Cope,et al.  Literacies: Approaches to Literacies , 2012 .

[70]  J. Sturm,et al.  Effects of Hand–Drawn and Computer–Generated Concept Mapping on the Expository Writing of Middle School Students with Learning Disabilities , 2002 .

[71]  Andrés Fernández-Ramos,et al.  Measuring students’ information skills through concept mapping , 2010, J. Inf. Sci..

[72]  D. McCutchen Knowledge, Processing, and Working Memory: Implications for a Theory of Writing , 2000 .

[73]  Fred Paas,et al.  Data Collection and Analysis , 2007 .

[74]  Richard L. Larson,et al.  Research on Written Composition: New Directions for Teaching , 1987 .