Class II-restricted T cell receptor engineered in vitro for higher affinity retains peptide specificity and function.

The T cell receptor (TCR) alphabeta heterodimer determines the peptide and MHC specificity of a T cell. It has been proposed that in vivo selection processes maintain low TCR affinities because T cells with higher-affinity TCRs would (i) have reduced functional capacity or (ii) cross-react with self-peptides resulting in clonal deletion. We used the class II-restricted T cell clone 3.L2, specific for murine hemoglobin (Hb/I-E(k)), to explore these possibilities by engineering higher-affinity TCR mutants. A 3.L2 single-chain TCR (Vbeta-linker-Valpha) was mutagenized and selected for thermal stability and surface expression in a yeast display system. Stabilized mutants were used to generate a library with CDR3 mutations that were selected with Hb/I-E(k) to isolate a panel of affinity mutants with K(D) values as low as 25 nM. Kinetic analysis of soluble single-chain TCRs showed that increased affinities were the result of both faster on-rates and slower off-rates. T cells transfected with the mutant TCRs and wild-type TCR responded to similar concentrations of peptide, indicating that the increased affinity was not detrimental to T cell activation. T cell transfectants maintained exquisite hemoglobin peptide specificity, but an altered peptide ligand that acted as an antagonist for the wild-type TCR was converted to a strong agonist with higher-affinity TCRs. These results show that T cells with high-affinity class II reactive TCRs are functional, but there is an affinity threshold above which an increase in affinity does not result in significant enhancement of T cell activation.

[1]  P. Allen,et al.  A Kinetic Threshold between Negative and Positive Selection Based on the Longevity of the T Cell Receptor–Ligand Complex , 1999, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[2]  M. Jackson,et al.  High-affinity reactions between antigen-specific T-cell receptors and peptides associated with allogeneic and syngeneic major histocompatibility complex class I proteins. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  K D Wittrup,et al.  Yeast polypeptide fusion surface display levels predict thermal stability and soluble secretion efficiency. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  David M. Kranz,et al.  TCRs with high affinity for foreign pMHC show self-reactivity , 2003, Nature Immunology.

[5]  J. Altman,et al.  Formation of functional peptide complexes of class II major histocompatibility complex proteins from subunits produced in Escherichia coli. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  David M Kranz,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the contribution of TCR/pepMHC affinity and CD8 to T cell activation. , 2003, Immunity.

[7]  C. Hausl,et al.  Clonal selection of helper T cells is determined by an affinity threshold with no further skewing of TCR binding properties. , 2004, Immunity.

[8]  K D Wittrup,et al.  In vitro evolution of a T cell receptor with high affinity for peptide/MHC. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  J. Foote,et al.  Breaking the affinity ceiling for antibodies and T cell receptors. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Morgan Huse,et al.  Agonist/endogenous peptide–MHC heterodimers drive T cell activation and sensitivity , 2005, Nature.

[11]  A. Lanzavecchia,et al.  Serial triggering of many T-cell receptors by a few peptide–MHC complexes , 1995, Nature.

[12]  Z. Grossman,et al.  Tuning of activation thresholds explains flexibility in the selection and development of T cells in the thymus. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  P. Allen,et al.  Separation of IL-4 production from Th cell proliferation by an altered T cell receptor ligand. , 1991, Science.

[14]  Mark M Davis,et al.  How T cells 'see' antigen , 2005, Nature Immunology.

[15]  Z Reich,et al.  Ligand recognition by alpha beta T cell receptors. , 1998, Annual review of immunology.

[16]  T. McKeithan,et al.  Kinetic proofreading in T-cell receptor signal transduction. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  R. Germain,et al.  Self-recognition promotes the foreign antigen sensitivity of naive T lymphocytes , 2002, Nature.

[18]  Arup K Chakraborty,et al.  CD4 enhances T cell sensitivity to antigen by coordinating Lck accumulation at the immunological synapse , 2004, Nature Immunology.

[19]  R C Stevens,et al.  A comparative analysis of the immunological evolution of antibody 28B4. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[20]  Raimund J. Ober,et al.  Kinetics and thermodynamics of T cell receptor– autoantigen interactions in murine experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Matthew R. Clutter,et al.  High-affinity, peptide-specific T cell receptors can be generated by mutations in CDR1, CDR2 or CDR3. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  D. Kranz,et al.  Cd8− T Cell Transfectants That Express a High Affinity T Cell Receptor Exhibit Enhanced Peptide-Dependent Activation , 2001, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[23]  P. Allen,et al.  Altered peptide ligand-induced partial T cell activation: molecular mechanisms and role in T cell biology. , 1996, Annual review of immunology.

[24]  M. Dwyer,et al.  Dissecting the binding energy epitope of a high-affinity variant of human growth hormone: cooperative and additive effects from combining mutations from independently selected phage display mutagenesis libraries. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[25]  David M. Kranz,et al.  Dissecting Cooperative and Additive Binding Energetics in the Affinity Maturation Pathway of a Protein-Protein Interface* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[26]  R. J. Cohen,et al.  The law of mass action governs antigen-stimulated cytolytic activity of CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  J. Bluestone,et al.  Peptide-MHC Class II Dimers as Therapeutics to Modulate Antigen-Specific T Cell Responses in Autoimmune Diabetes1 , 2003, The Journal of Immunology.

[28]  K D Wittrup,et al.  Selection of functional T cell receptor mutants from a yeast surface-display library. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  C. Nelson,et al.  Structural and Functional Consequences of Altering a Peptide MHC Anchor Residue1 , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[30]  T. Zal,et al.  Nonstimulatory peptides contribute to antigen-induced CD8–T cell receptor interaction at the immunological synapse , 2005, Nature Immunology.

[31]  D. Fremont,et al.  High- and low-potency ligands with similar affinities for the TCR: the importance of kinetics in TCR signaling. , 1998, Immunity.

[32]  Michele C. Kieke,et al.  Directed evolution of a stable scaffold for T-cell receptor engineering , 2000, Nature Biotechnology.

[33]  P. Allen,et al.  Differential requirements for CD4 in TCR-ligand interactions. , 1999, Journal of immunology.

[34]  S. Buus,et al.  Complete dissection of the Hb(64-76) determinant using T helper 1, T helper 2 clones, and T cell hybridomas. , 1992, Journal of immunology.

[35]  P. Allen,et al.  Fidelity of T cell activation through multistep T cell receptor zeta phosphorylation. , 1998, Science.

[36]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Two-step binding mechanism for T-cell receptor recognition of peptide–MHC , 2002, Nature.

[37]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Direct observation of ligand recognition by T cells , 2002, Nature.

[38]  Timothy K Starr,et al.  Positive and negative selection of T cells. , 2003, Annual review of immunology.

[39]  Eric T. Boder,et al.  Yeast surface display for screening combinatorial polypeptide libraries , 1997, Nature Biotechnology.

[40]  H. Eisen,et al.  Evidence that a single peptide-MHC complex on a target cell can elicit a cytolytic T cell response. , 1996, Immunity.

[41]  Alexis M. Kalergis,et al.  Efficient T cell activation requires an optimal dwell-time of interaction between the TCR and the pMHC complex , 2001, Nature Immunology.

[42]  Daniel Coombs,et al.  T cell receptor binding kinetics required for T cell activation depend on the density of cognate ligand on the antigen-presenting cell. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.