Does platform switching really prevent crestal bone loss around implants

Summary To maintain long-term implant stability, it is important to minimize bone loss around the implant. Several clinical studies have shown a mean marginal bone loss around dental implants of 1.5–2 mm in the first year after prosthetic restoration. Currently, concepts to prevent bone loss around dental implants have been reported as the platform switching (PLS). This technique use of prosthetic abutments with reduced width in relation to the implant platform diameter seems to have the greatest potential to limit the crestal resorption. However, there are only a few reports on the mechanism of action or the extent of bone loss prevention, and as such, it is difficult to say that the effect of PLS has been thoroughly examined. Excluding case reports, articles on PLS can be broadly categorized into: (1) radiographic evaluation of crestal bone level in humans, (2) histological and histomorphometrical analysis in animals, or (3) finite element analysis. This review revealed a shortage of published data for above three categories related PLS. Researchers have attempted to explain the mechanism of action of PLS; however, it is necessary to conduct further studies, including histological studies using animals, to clarify the mechanism fully.

[1]  R. Delgado-Ruiz,et al.  Immediate maxillary restoration of single-tooth implants using platform switching for crestal bone preservation: a 12-month study. , 2009, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[2]  Laura López Marí,et al.  Immediate loading and immediate restoration in 105 expanded-platform implants via the Diem System after a 16-month follow-up period. , 2008 .

[3]  David M Gardner,et al.  Platform switching as a means to achieving implant esthetics. , 2005, The New York state dental journal.

[4]  Hom-lay Wang,et al.  Effect of Microthreads and Platform Switching on Crestal Bone Stress Levels: A Finite Element Analysis , 2008 .

[5]  J. Wennström,et al.  The peri-implant hard and soft tissues at different implant systems. A comparative study in the dog. , 1996, Clinical oral implants research.

[6]  J. Lindhe,et al.  Different types of inflammatory reactions in peri-implant soft tissues. , 2005, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[7]  D P Tarnow,et al.  The effect of inter-implant distance on the height of inter-implant bone crest. , 2000, Journal of periodontology.

[8]  Hom-lay Wang,et al.  Effect of Platform Switching on Implant Crest Bone Stress: A Finite Element Analysis , 2009, Implant dentistry.

[9]  C. Han,et al.  A 1-year radiographic evaluation of marginal bone around dental implants. , 1996, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[10]  M. Quirynen,et al.  Bacterial colonization of the internal part of two-stage implants. An in vivo study. , 1993, Clinical oral implants research.

[11]  D. Di Iorio,et al.  Evaluation of peri-implant bone loss around platform-switched implants. , 2008, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[12]  Richard J Lazzara,et al.  Platform switching: a new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. , 2006, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[13]  A. Piattelli,et al.  Immediately loaded titanium implant with a tissue-stabilizing/maintaining design ('beyond platform switch') retrieved from man after 4 weeks: a histological and histomorphometrical evaluation. A case report. , 2008, Clinical oral implants research.

[14]  Kitetsu Shin,et al.  The influence of controlled occlusal overload on peri-implant tissue. part 4: a histologic study in monkeys. , 1998, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[15]  T Albrektsson,et al.  Consensus report: towards optimized treatment outcomes for dental implants. , 1998, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[16]  G. Rasperini,et al.  Preservation of peri-implant soft and hard tissues using platform switching of implants placed in immediate extraction sockets: a proof-of-concept study with 12- to 36-month follow-up. , 2007, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[17]  F. Schwarz,et al.  Influence of platform switching on crestal bone changes at non-submerged titanium implants: a histomorphometrical study in dogs. , 2007, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[18]  A. Terano,et al.  An Experimental Study in Dogs , 1990 .

[19]  L. Canullo,et al.  Short-term bone level observations associated with platform switching in immediately placed and restored single maxillary implants: a preliminary report. , 2009, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[20]  D Buser,et al.  Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible. , 2001, Journal of periodontology.

[21]  G. Romanos,et al.  Immediate loading using cross-arch fixed restorations in heavy smokers: nine consecutive case reports for edentulous arches. , 2008, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[22]  J. Lindhe,et al.  The mucosal barrier following abutment dis/reconnection. An experimental study in dogs. , 1997, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[23]  J. Guirado,et al.  Immediate Provisionalization on a New Implant Design for Esthetic Restoration and Preserving Crestal Bone , 2007 .

[24]  F. Isidor,et al.  Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants. A clinical and radiographic study in monkeys. , 1996, Clinical oral implants research.

[25]  K. Akca,et al.  Biomechanical Aspects of Bone-Level Diameter Shifting at Implant-Abutment Interface , 2009, Implant dentistry.

[26]  Yoshinobu Maeda,et al.  Biomechanical analysis on platform switching: is there any biomechanical rationale? , 2007, Clinical oral implants research.

[27]  J. Lindhe,et al.  Bacterial colonization on internal surfaces of Brånemark system implant components. , 1996, Clinical oral implants research.

[28]  Giuseppe Vairo,et al.  The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. , 2008, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[29]  P. Thomsen,et al.  The soft tissue barrier at implants and teeth. , 1991, Clinical oral implants research.

[30]  D Buser,et al.  Biologic width around titanium implants. A histometric analysis of the implanto-gingival junction around unloaded and loaded nonsubmerged implants in the canine mandible. , 1997, Journal of periodontology.

[31]  Frank Schwarz,et al.  Stability of crestal bone level at platform-switched non-submerged titanium implants: a histomorphometrical study in dogs. , 2009, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[32]  C. Misch,et al.  The causes of early implant bone loss: myth or science? , 2002, Journal of periodontology.

[33]  Henriette Lerner,et al.  Factors Influencing the Preservation of the Periimplant Marginal Bone , 2007, Implant dentistry.

[34]  F. Isidor,et al.  Histological evaluation of peri-implant bone at implants subjected to occlusal overload or plaque accumulation. , 1997, Clinical oral implants research.

[35]  D van Steenberghe,et al.  Microbial penetration along the implant components of the Brånemark system. An in vitro study. , 1994, Clinical oral implants research.

[36]  D. M. Dohan Ehrenfest,et al.  The Relevance of Choukroun's Platelet-Rich Fibrin and Metronidazole During Complex Maxillary Rehabilitations Using Bone Allograft. Part II: Implant Surgery, Prosthodontics, and Survival , 2009, Implant dentistry.

[37]  J. Fiorellini,et al.  Soft tissue reactions to non-submerged unloaded titanium implants in beagle dogs. , 1992, Journal of periodontology.

[38]  M. Hürzeler,et al.  Peri-implant bone level around implants with platform-switched abutments: preliminary data from a prospective study. , 2007, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[39]  Fernando Zarone,et al.  A randomized prospective multicenter trial evaluating the platform-switching technique for the prevention of postrestorative crestal bone loss. , 2009, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[40]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  Influence of the microgap in the peri-implant hard and soft tissues: a histomorphometric study in dogs. , 2002, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[41]  Dennis P Tarnow,et al.  The effect of interimplant distance on the height of the interimplant bone crest when using platform-switched implants. , 2009, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[42]  P I Brånemark,et al.  A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. , 1981, International journal of oral surgery.

[43]  Markus Blatz,et al.  The concept of platform switching. , 2008, Practical procedures & aesthetic dentistry : PPAD.

[44]  S. Dibart,et al.  In vitro evaluation of the implant-abutment bacterial seal: the locking taper system. , 2005, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[45]  Tiziano Testori,et al.  A new implant design for crestal bone preservation: initial observations and case report. , 2005, Practical procedures & aesthetic dentistry : PPAD.