Epidemiology of meningitis with a negative CSF Gram stain: under-utilization of available diagnostic tests

SUMMARY Meningitis with a negative cerebrospinal fluid Gram stain (CSF-GS) poses a diagnostic challenge as more than 50% of patients remain without an aetiology. The introduction of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and arboviral serologies have increased diagnostic capabilities, yet large scale epidemiological studies evaluating their use in clinical practice are lacking. We conducted a prospective observational study in New Orleans between November 1999 and September 2008 (early era) when PCR was not widely available, and in Houston between November 2008 and June 2013 (modern era), when PCR was commonly used. Patients presenting with meningitis and negative CSF-GS were followed for 4 weeks. All investigations, PCR used, and results were recorded as they became available. In 323 patients enrolled, PCR provided the highest diagnostic yield (24·2%) but was ordered for 128 (39·6%) patients; followed by serology for arboviruses (15%) that was ordered for 100 (31%) of all patients. The yield of blood cultures was (10·3%) and that of CSF cultures was 4%; the yield for all other tests was <10%. Overall, 65% of the patients remained without a diagnosis at 4 weeks: 72·1% in early era vs. 53·4% (P < 0·01) in modern era; this change was attributed to diagnosing more viral pathogens, 8·3% and 26·3% (P < 0·01), respectively. The introduction of PCR and arboviral serologies has improved the yield of diagnosing patients with meningitis and a negative CSF-GS, but both tests are being under-utilized.

[1]  A. van der Ende,et al.  Risk score for identifying adults with CSF pleocytosis and negative CSF Gram stain at low risk for an urgent treatable cause. , 2013, The Journal of infection.

[2]  R. Hasbún,et al.  Meningitis with a negative cerebrospinal fluid Gram stain in adults: risk classification for an adverse clinical outcome. , 2012, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[3]  B. Custer,et al.  Estimated cumulative incidence of West Nile virus infection in US adults, 1999–2010 , 2012, Epidemiology and Infection.

[4]  M. Fitch,et al.  Emergency diagnosis and treatment of adult meningitis. , 2007, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[5]  S. Kaplan,et al.  Practice guidelines for the management of bacterial meningitis. , 2004, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[6]  J. Reitsma,et al.  Clinical features and prognostic factors in adults with bacterial meningitis. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  R. DeBiasi,et al.  Molecular Methods for Diagnosis of Viral Encephalitis , 2004, Clinical Microbiology Reviews.

[8]  R. Holman,et al.  Viral Meningitis-Associated Hospitalizations in the United States, 1988–1999 , 2003, Neuroepidemiology.

[9]  H. Pfister,et al.  Pathophysiology of bacterial meningitis: mechanism(s) of neuronal injury. , 2002, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[10]  K. Kelleher,et al.  Cerebrospinal fluid findings in aseptic versus bacterial meningitis. , 2000, Pediatrics.

[11]  F. Harrell,et al.  Differential diagnosis of acute meningitis. An analysis of the predictive value of initial observations. , 1989, JAMA.

[12]  K. Nelson,et al.  Community-acquired purulent meningitis: a review of 1,316 cases during the antibiotic era, 1954-1976. , 1980, Reviews of infectious diseases.

[13]  O. Villavicencio,et al.  Acute aseptic meningitis syndrome. , 1963, Journal of the Philippine Medical Association.