Trading for Security: Military Alliances and Economic Agreements*

The authors appraise a well-known argument connecting economics and security in international relations: military allies are likely to trade more with one another than non-allies. A review of alliance treaties and diplomatic history suggests that, under certain conditions, states may tie together alliance agreements and economic agreements. When states explicitly link alliance agreements with economic cooperation, one would expect to see increased economic exchange coinciding with coordinated security policies. This article evaluates whether the linking of economic and security agreements accounts for a positive relationship between alliances and trade among European states before World War II and produces evidence in support of this argument. Trade among allies who have specified economic cooperation in their alliance agreements is higher than trade among non-allied states and higher than trade among allies who have not promised economic cooperation. In contrast, trade among allies without specific economic provisions in their treaties is statistically no different from trade among non-allies. Thus, the positive empirical relationship between alliances and trade that the authors find in pre-WWII Europe is a result of only a specific subset of all military alliances, namely, those treaties that stipulate economic cooperation between the allies. This study advances our understanding of the alliance–trade relationship by focusing attention on the joint negotiation of cooperation in different issue-areas.

[1]  B. Hoekman Determining the need for issue linkages in multilateral trade negotiations , 1989, International Organization.

[2]  Randolph M. Siverson,et al.  Correction to “The Political Determinants of International Trade” , 1999, American Political Science Review.

[3]  J. Fearon Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation , 1998, International Organization.

[4]  Peter E. Kennedy Estimation with Correctly Interpreted Dummy Variables in Semilogarithmic Equations , 1981 .

[5]  John A. Sawyer,et al.  An econometric study of international trade flows , 1967 .

[6]  Curtis S. Signorino,et al.  Tau-b or Not Tau-b: Measuring the Similarity of Foreign Policy Positions , 1999 .

[7]  J. David Singer,et al.  Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1816–1992: Rationale, Coding Rules, and Empirical Patterns , 1996 .

[8]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.

[9]  Robert L. Rothstein,et al.  Alliances and Small Powers , 1968 .

[10]  Robert Axelrod,et al.  Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions , 1985, World Politics.

[11]  Rachel Bronson,et al.  Alliances, Preferential Trading Arrangements, and International Trade , 1997 .

[12]  Brian M. Pollins Conflict, Cooperation, and Commerce: The Effect of International Political Interactions on Bilateral Trade Flows , 1989 .

[13]  H W Brown An innocent abroad. , 1974, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[14]  William J. Dixon,et al.  Political Similarity and American Foreign Trade Patterns , 1993 .

[15]  J. D. Morrow Alliances and Asymmetry: An Alternative to the Capability Aggregation Model of Alliances , 1991 .

[16]  Joanne Gowa,et al.  Power Politics and International Trade , 1993, American Political Science Review.

[17]  Helen V. Milner,et al.  Free to Trade: Democracies, Autocracies, and International Trade , 2000, American Political Science Review.

[18]  Kenneth A. Oye Cooperation under Anarchy , 1986 .

[19]  Michael Taylor The possibility of cooperation , 1987 .

[20]  J. Bergstrand The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence , 1985 .

[21]  M. D. McGinnis,et al.  Issue Linkage and the Evolution of International Cooperation , 1986 .

[22]  Nathaniel Beck,et al.  Throwing Out the Baby with the Bath Water: A Comment on Green, Yoon and Kim , 2000 .

[23]  Kenneth W. Abbott,et al.  Hard and Soft Law in International Governance , 2000, International Organization.

[24]  Nathaniel Beck,et al.  Throwing Out the Baby with the Bath Water: A Comment on Green, Kim, and Yoon , 2001, International Organization.

[25]  J. E. Helmreich The Negotiation of the Franco-Belgian Military Accord of 1920 , 1964 .

[26]  M. Hurst Key treaties for the great powers, 1814-1914 , 1972 .

[27]  Nathaniel Beck,et al.  Nuisance vs. Substance: Specifying and Estimating Time-Series-Cross-Section Models , 1996, Political Analysis.

[28]  Clifton T Morgan Untying the Knot of War: A Bargaining Theory of International Crises , 1994 .

[29]  Joanne Gowa,et al.  Alliances, Imperfect Markets, and Major-Power Trade , 2004, International Organization.

[30]  G. Barraclough A Diplomatic History of Europe Since the Congress of Vienna , 1959 .

[31]  Bruce Russett,et al.  Democratic Trading Partners: The Liberal Connection, 1962-1989 , 1998, The Journal of Politics.

[32]  Bruce Russett,et al.  Peace, war, and numbers , 1972 .

[33]  Jeffrey M. Woodbridge Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2002 .

[34]  Paul W. Schroeder Alliances, 1815–1945: Weapons of Power and Tools of Management , 2004 .

[35]  Christina L. Davis,et al.  International Institutions and Issue Linkage: Building Support for Agricultural Trade Liberalization , 2004, American Political Science Review.

[36]  Ted Robert Gurr,et al.  Transitions to Democracy: Tracking Democracy''s Third Wave with the Polity III Data , 1996 .

[37]  K. Knorr Historical Dimensions of National Security Problems , 1976 .

[38]  D. Giles The interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations: Unbiased estimation , 1982 .

[39]  D. Scott Bennett,et al.  Eugene: A conceptual manual , 2000 .

[40]  C. Kindleberger Dominance and Leadership in the International EconomyExploitation, Public Goods, and Free Rides , 1981 .

[41]  Jeffrey A. Frankel,et al.  The Regionalization Of The World Economy , 1997 .

[42]  J. Fearon Rationalist explanations for war , 1995, International Organization.

[43]  Andrew G. Long,et al.  Alliance Treaty Obligations and Provisions, 1815-1944 , 2002 .

[44]  James E. Anderson A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation , 1979 .

[45]  M. Fratianni The Gravity Equation in International Trade , 2009 .

[46]  John A. C. Conybeare Public Goods, Prisoners' Dilemmas and the International Political Economy , 1984 .

[47]  Joanne Gowa,et al.  Allies, Adversaries, and International Trade , 1993 .

[48]  Robert Sahr Using Inflation-Adjusted Dollars in Analyzing Political Developments , 2004, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[49]  Jonathan N. Katz,et al.  What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data , 1995, American Political Science Review.

[50]  Andrew G. Long,et al.  Defense Pacts and International Trade , 2003 .

[51]  J. Bergstrand The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and the Factor-Proportions Theory in International Trade , 1989 .

[52]  R. Halvorsen,et al.  The Interpretation of Dummy Variables in Semilogarithmic Equations , 1980 .

[53]  J. Tir Letting Secessionists Have Their Way: Can Partitions Help End and Prevent Ethnic Conflicts? , 2002 .

[54]  Stephen D. Krasner State Power and the Structure of International Trade , 1976, World Politics.

[55]  Bruce Bueno de Mesquita,et al.  The War Trap , 1981 .

[56]  Robert D. Tollison,et al.  An economic theory of mutually advantageous issue linkages in international negotiations , 1979, International Organization.

[57]  R. E. Newnham More Flies with Honey: Positive Economic Linkage in German Ostpolitik from Bismarck to Kohl , 2000 .

[58]  Luke Keele,et al.  Dynamic Models for Dynamic Theories: The Ins and Outs of Lagged Dependent Variables , 2006, Political Analysis.

[59]  Lisa L. Martin,et al.  The Promise of Institutionalist Theory , 1995 .

[60]  Randolph M. Siverson,et al.  The Political Determinants of International Trade: The Major Powers, 1907–1990 , 1998, American Political Science Review.