QA in Radiation Therapy: The RPC Perspective

The Radiological Physics Center (RPC) is charged with assuring the consistent delivery of radiation doses to patients on NCI-sponsored clinical trials. To accomplish this, the RPC conducts annual mailed audits of machine calibration, dosimetry audit visits to institutions, reviews of treatment records, and credentialing procedures requiring the irradiation of anthropomorphic phantoms. Through these measurements, the RPC has gained an understanding of the level of quality assurance practiced in this cohort of institutions, and a database of measurements of beam characteristics of a large number of treatment machines. The results of irradiations of phantoms have yielded insight into the delivery of advanced technology treatment procedures.

[1]  D. L. Simms,et al.  Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies , 1986 .

[2]  R J Gastorf,et al.  Mailable TLD system for photon and electron therapy beams. , 1986, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  W F Hanson,et al.  Uncertainty analysis of absorbed dose calculations from thermoluminescence dosimeters. , 1992, Medical physics.

[4]  Lexikon: Dictionary of Health Care Terms, Organizations, and Acronyms for the Era of Reform , 1994 .

[5]  J. Palta,et al.  Comprehensive QA for Radiation Oncology , 1994 .

[6]  J. Palta,et al.  Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 40. , 1994, Medical physics.

[7]  C. Patterson.  Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations , 1995, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[8]  R. Macklis,et al.  Error rates in clinical radiotherapy. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  W. Dewé,et al.  Evaluation of frequency and type of errors detected by a computerized record and verify system during radiation treatment. , 1999, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[10]  Sören Mattsson,et al.  Prevention of accidental exposures to patients undergoing radiation therapy , 2000 .

[11]  A. Wall,et al.  Book ReviewTo Err is Human: building a safer health system Kohn L T Corrigan J M Donaldson M S Washington DC USA: Institute of Medicine/National Academy Press ISBN 0 309 06837 1 $34.95 , 2000 .

[12]  L. Kohn,et al.  To Err Is Human : Building a Safer Health System , 2007 .

[13]  M. Bolla,et al.  Clinical impact of dosimetry quality assurance programmes assessed by radiobiological modelling of data from the thermoluminescent dosimetry study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. , 2000, European journal of cancer.

[14]  D. Gaffney,et al.  Facilitation of radiotherapeutic error by computerized record and verify systems. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  Jean-Pierre Bissonnette,et al.  Error in the delivery of radiation therapy: results of a quality assurance review. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  B. Thomadsen,et al.  AAPM Task Group 103 report on peer review in clinical radiation oncology physics , 2005, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[17]  Lawrence B Marks,et al.  The impact of advanced technologies on treatment deviations in radiation treatment delivery. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  TH‐D‐352‐05: Optically Stimulated Luminescence (OSL) Dosimeters Can Be Used for Remote Dosimetry Services , 2008 .

[19]  Fang-Fang Yin,et al.  Task Group 142 report: quality assurance of medical accelerators. , 2009, Medical physics.