Non-Archimedean Tame Topology and Stably Dominated Types

Over the field of real numbers, analytic geometry has long been in deep interaction with algebraic geometry, bringing the latter subject many of its topological insights. In recent decades, model theory has joined this work through the theory of o-minimality, providing finiteness and uniformity statements and new structural tools. For non-archimedean fields, such as the p-adics, the Berkovich analytification provides a connected topology with many thoroughgoing analogies to the real topology on the set of complex points, and it has become an important tool in algebraic dynamics and many other areas of geometry. This book lays down model-theoretic foundations for non-archimedean geometry. The methods combine o-minimality and stability theory. Definable types play a central role, serving first to define the notion of a point and then properties such as definable compactness. Beyond the foundations, the main theorem constructs a deformation retraction from the full non-archimedean space of an algebraic variety to a rational polytope. This generalizes previous results of V. Berkovich, who used resolution of singularities methods. No previous knowledge of non-archimedean geometry is assumed. Model-theoretic prerequisites are reviewed in the first sections.

[1]  A. Ducros Espaces analytiques $p$-adiques au sens de Berkovich , 2006 .

[2]  M. Coste AN INTRODUCTION TO O-MINIMAL GEOMETRY , 2002 .

[3]  Moshe Kamensky Ind- and pro- definable sets , 2007, Ann. Pure Appl. Log..

[4]  Serge Lang,et al.  Abelian varieties , 1983 .

[5]  Affine Structures and Non-Archimedean Analytic Spaces , 2004, math/0406564.

[6]  I. Yaacov Tensor products of valued fields , 2013, 1302.1381.

[7]  Jeff Gipson,et al.  Cycles , 1992, The Americas.

[8]  Ehud Hrushovski,et al.  Model theory of difference fields , 1999 .

[9]  Lou van den Dries,et al.  Dimension of Definable Sets, Algebraic Boundedness and Henselian Fields , 1989, Ann. Pure Appl. Log..

[10]  Pantelis E. Eleftheriou,et al.  Groups definable in ordered vector spaces over ordered division rings , 2007, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[11]  F. Loeser,et al.  Smooth p-adic analytic spaces are locally contractible. II , 2004 .

[12]  V. Berkovich Smooth p-adic analytic spaces are locally contractible , 1999 .

[13]  Ehud Hrushovski,et al.  Computing the Galois group of a linear differential equation , 2002 .

[14]  Ramification of local fields with imperfect residue fields , 2000, math/0010103.

[15]  V. Berkovich Spectral Theory and Analytic Geometry over Non-Archimedean Fields , 1990 .

[16]  M. Ziegler,et al.  A language for topological structures which satisfies a Lindström-theorem , 1976 .

[17]  Pantelis E. Eleftheriou A semi-linear group which is not affine , 2008, Ann. Pure Appl. Log..

[18]  Alexander Grothendieck,et al.  Éléments de géométrie algébrique : II. Étude globale élémentaire de quelques classes de morphismes , 1961 .

[19]  Jean-Pierre Serre,et al.  Lectures On The Mordell-Weil Theorem , 1989 .

[20]  Deirdre Haskell,et al.  Definable sets in algebraically closed valued fields: elimination of imaginaries , 2006 .

[21]  Deirdre Haskell,et al.  Stable Domination and Independence in Algebraically Closed Valued Fields , 2005, math/0511310.

[22]  E. Hrushovski,et al.  Valued fields, metastable groups , 2017, Selecta Mathematica.

[23]  J'erome Poineau Un résultat de connexité pour les variétés analytiques p-adiques: privilège et noethérianité , 2006, Compositio Mathematica.

[24]  Peter Winkler,et al.  Model-completeness and skolem expansions , 1975 .

[25]  Amaury Thuillier Géométrie toroïdale et géométrie analytique non archimédienne. Application au type d’homotopie de certains schémas formels , 2007 .

[26]  Anand Pillay,et al.  Introduction to stability theory , 1983, Oxford logic guides.

[27]  Manfred Knebusch On valuation spectra , 1998 .

[28]  Ehud Hrushovski,et al.  Integration in valued fields , 2006 .

[29]  Charles Steinhorn,et al.  Tame Topology and O-Minimal Structures , 2008 .

[30]  Chen C. Chang,et al.  Model Theory: Third Edition (Dover Books On Mathematics) By C.C. Chang;H. Jerome Keisler;Mathematics , 1966 .

[31]  Vladimir Voevodsky,et al.  Cycles, Transfers And Motivic Homology Theories , 2000 .

[32]  Boris Zilber,et al.  Stable domination and independence in algebraically closed valued fields (Lecture Notes in Logic 30) , 2010 .

[33]  A. Grothendieck,et al.  Éléments de géométrie algébrique , 1960 .

[34]  R. W. K. Odoni FIELD ARITHMETIC (Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete (3) 11) , 1988 .

[35]  Ehud Hrushovski Imaginaries and definable types in algebraically closed valued fields , 2014 .

[36]  H. Hahn,et al.  Über die nichtarchimedischen Größensysteme , 1995 .

[37]  H. Jerome Keisler,et al.  Model theory, Third Edition , 1992, Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics.

[38]  V. Berkovich Étale cohomology for non-Archimedean analytic spaces , 1993 .

[39]  Ehud Hrushovski,et al.  On NIP and invariant measures , 2007, 0710.2330.

[40]  H. Bateman Book Review: Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete , 1933 .

[41]  D. Mumford Abelian Varieties Tata Institute of Fundamental Research , 1970 .

[42]  C. Steinhorn,et al.  Definable Compactness and Definable Subgroups of o‐Minimal Groups , 1999 .

[43]  A. Ducros Parties semi-algébriques d'une variété algébrique p-adique , 2003 .