Mental maps compared to actual spatial behavior using GPS data: A new method for investigating segregation in cities

Abstract This article examines the relationship between perceived territorial boundaries and actual spatial activity. The methodology used includes a combination of mental maps and interviews for examining perceptions of territorial boundaries, with tracking technology (GPS) and activity diaries to track the actual use of space. This methodology was implemented in a pilot study with a sample of 18 women living in Jerusalem, including secular Jews, ultra-orthodox Jews, and Palestinian Muslims. The study found a very strong relationship between perceived personal territory and actual spatial activity. However, while the secular Jewish women appeared to be completely segregated within their territory, the ultra-orthodox Jewish women and the Palestinian Muslim women were both very active within the secular Jewish territory, but avoided each other’s territories. The analysis of mental maps and actual spatial patterns of residential daily activities challenges prevailing notions about the spatial structure of Jerusalem and the internal power relations between the populations that inhabit it. More generally, it provides a new methodological approach for investigating segregation in cities.

[1]  Scott A. Bollens,et al.  Urban Policy in Ethnically Polarized Societies , 1998 .

[2]  C. Estlund,et al.  Working Together: How Workplace Bonds Strengthen a Diverse Democracy , 2004 .

[3]  Martin Dijst,et al.  Two-earner families and their action spaces: A case study of two dutch communities , 1999 .

[4]  Robert Lloyd,et al.  A Cognitive Model for Recreational Spatial Behavior in an Urban Area , 2013 .

[5]  Tovi Fenster.  Space for Gender: Cultural Roles of the Forbidden and the Permitted , 1999 .

[6]  Tovi Fenster.  Ethnicity, Citizenship, Planning and Gender: The case of Ethiopian immigrant women in Israel , 1998 .

[7]  A. Giddens.  Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age , 1992, The New Social Theory Reader.

[8]  M. Dijst,et al.  Short-term Dynamics in the Use of Places: A Space-Time Typology of Visitor Populations in the Netherlands , 2006 .

[9]  Scott A. Bollens,et al.  Urban Planning amidst Ethnic Conflict: Jerusalem and Johannesburg , 1998 .

[10]  M. Kwan.  Mobile Communications, Social Networks, and Urban Travel: Hypertext as a New Metaphor for Conceptualizing Spatial Interaction , 2007 .

[11]  D. Harvey,et al.  The Urban Experience , 2020, Bastard Feudalism, English Society and the Law.

[12]  R. Pain,et al.  Space, sexual violence and social control: integrating geographical and feminist analyses of women's fear of crime , 1991 .

[13]  Avishai Melamed,et al.  Separate and Unequal: The Inside Story of Israeli Rule in East Jerusalem , 1999 .

[14]  C. Peach,et al.  Urban social segregation , 1975 .

[15]  A. Amin.  Ethnicity and the Multicultural City: Living with Diversity , 2002 .

[16]  Frederic Bartumeus,et al.  New Approaches to Human Mobility: Using Mobile Phones for Demographic Research , 2013, Demography.

[17]  Mei-Po Kwan,et al.  VISUALISATION OF SOCIO‐SPATIAL ISOLATION BASED ON HUMAN ACTIVITY PATTERNS AND SOCIAL NETWORKS IN SPACE‐TIME , 2011 .

[18]  Shlomo Hasson.  Territories and identities in Jerusalem , 2001 .

[19]  Damaris Rose.  On Feminism, Method And Methods In Human Geography: An Idiosyncratic Overview , 1993 .

[20]  Ali Madanipour,et al.  Design of Urban Space: An Inquiry into a Socio-Spatial Process , 1996 .

[21]  L. McDowell,et al.  Towards an Understanding of the Gender Division of Urban Space , 1983 .

[22]  Robert E. Park,et al.  The Urban Community as a Spatial Pattern and a Moral Order , 2006 .

[23]  Tovi Fenster,et al.  A tale of two cities: Jerusalem and Tel Aviv in an age of globalization , 2005 .

[24]  M. Nava.  Domestic Cosmopolitanism and Structures of Feeling: the Specificity of London , 2006 .

[25]  Harry Timmermans,et al.  Applications of behavioural research on spatial problems I: cognition , 1990 .

[26]  G. Valentine,et al.  Negotiating Difference through Everyday Encounters: The Case of Sexual Orientation and Religion and Belief , 2012 .

[27]  N. Gale,et al.  Exploring the anchor-point hypothesis of spatial cognition , 1987 .

[28]  Hille Koskela,et al.  'Bold Walk and Breakings': Women's spatial confidence versus fear of violence , 1997 .

[29]  David W. S. Wong,et al.  Measuring segregation: an activity space approach , 2011, J. Geogr. Syst..

[30]  Caroline Holland,et al.  Social interactions in urban public places , 2007 .

[31]  L. Bondi,et al.  Constructing gender, constructing the urban: A review of Anglo-American feminist urban geography , 2003 .

[32]  Anne B. Shlay,et al.  Making Place: The Shifting Green Line and the Development of “Greater” Metropolitan Jerusalem , 2010 .

[33]  Anne R. Pebley,et al.  Redefining Neighborhoods Using Common Destinations: Social Characteristics of Activity Spaces and Home Census Tracts Compared , 2014, Demography.

[34]  Francesco Chiodelli,et al.  Re-shaping Jerusalem: The transformation of Jerusalem’s metropolitan area by the Israeli barrier , 2013 .

[35]  Michael Pacione,et al.  Information and Morphology in Cognitive Maps , 1978 .

[36]  P. Thornton,et al.  Revisiting Time—Space Diaries: An Exploratory Case Study of Tourist Behaviour in Cornwall, England , 1997 .

[37]  G. Valentine.  Theorizing and Researching Intersectionality: A Challenge for Feminist Geography* , 2007 .

[38]  Catherine Morency,et al.  Activity Spaces and the Measurement of Clustering and Exposure: A Case Study of Linguistic Groups in Montreal , 2012 .

[39]  Arza Churchman.  Women and the environment , 1994 .

[40]  N. Shoval,et al.  Application of Tracking Technologies to the Study of Pedestrian Spatial Behavior* , 2006 .

[41]  Orna Blumen,et al.  Two Social Environments in a Working Day: Occupation and Spatial Segregation in Metropolitan Tel Aviv , 2001 .

[42]  Noam Shoval,et al.  Tracking technologies and urban analysis , 2008 .

[43]  Gill Valentine,et al.  Living with difference: reflections on geographies of encounter , 2008 .

[44]  Peter Orleans.  Differential Cognition of Urban Residents: Effects of Social Scale on Mapping. , 1973 .

[45]  B. Langer,et al.  The Practice of Everyday Life , 2019, Forms of Thinking in Leopardi’s Zibaldone.

[46]  Harold Carter,et al.  The study of urban geography , 1972 .

[47]  R. Lloyd,et al.  THE IDENTIFICATION OF REGIONAL BOUNDARIES ON COGNITIVE MAPS , 1986 .

[48]  I. Schnell,et al.  The Sociospatial Isolation of Agents in Everyday Life Spaces as an Aspect of Segregation , 2001 .

[49]  I. Benenson,et al.  Between the Individual and the Community: Residential Patterns of the Haredi Population in Jerusalem , 2013 .

[50]  Wendell Bell,et al.  Social Area Analysis. , 1956 .

[51]  J. Ruiz-Tagle.  A Theory of Socio-spatial Integration: Problems, Policies and Concepts from a US Perspective , 2013 .

[52]  In Place and At Home in the City: Connecting privilege, safety and belonging for women in Toronto , 2005 .

[53]  M. Blades,et al.  The Cognition of Geographic Space , 2002 .

[54]  Mark Ellis,et al.  Work Together, Live Apart? Geographies of Racial and Ethnic Segregation at Home and at Work , 2004 .

[55]  Hille Koskela,et al.  Revisiting fear and place: women's fear of attack and the built environment , 2000 .

[56]  Aída Hurtado.  The Color of Privilege: Three Blasphemies on Race and Feminism , 1996 .

[57]  R. Golledge,et al.  Spatial Behavior: A Geographic Perspective , 1996 .