Connecting plug-in vehicles with green electricity through consumer demand

The environmental benefits of plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs) increase if the vehicles are powered by electricity from ‘green’ sources such as solar, wind or small-scale hydroelectricity. Here, we explore the potential to build a market that pairs consumer purchases of PEVs with purchases of green electricity. We implement a web-based survey with three US samples defined by vehicle purchases: conventional new vehicle buyers (n = 1064), hybrid vehicle buyers (n = 364) and PEV buyers (n = 74). Respondents state their interest in a PEV as their next vehicle, in purchasing green electricity in one of three ways, i.e., monthly subscription, two-year lease or solar panel purchase, and in combining the two products. Although we find that a link between PEVs and green electricity is not presently strong in the consciousness of most consumers, the combination is attractive to some consumers when presented. Across all three respondent segments, pairing a PEV with a green electricity program increased interest in PEVs—with a 23% demand increase among buyers of conventional vehicles. Overall, about one-third of respondents presently value the combination of a PEV with green electricity; the proportion is much higher among previous HEV and PEV buyers. Respondents’ reported motives for interest in both products and their combination include financial savings (particularly among conventional buyers), concerns about air pollution and the environment, and interest in new technology (particularly among PEV buyers). The results provide guidance regarding policy and marketing strategies to advance PEVs and green electricity demand.

[1]  Jonn Axsen,et al.  Can Markets for Electric Vehicles and Green Electricity Accelerate Each Other? Initial Conversations with Consumers , 2012 .

[2]  Jonn Axsen,et al.  Early U.S. Market for Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2009 .

[3]  Kyle W Meisterling,et al.  Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from plug-in hybrid vehicles: implications for policy. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  Mark A. Delucchi,et al.  Chapter Two – Lifetime Cost of Battery, Fuel-Cell, and Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2010 .

[5]  Matthew J. Kotchen,et al.  Private Provision of Environmental Public Goods: Household Participation in Green-Electricity Programs , 2007 .

[6]  Matthew J. Kotchen,et al.  Internal and external influences on pro-environmental behavior: Participation in a green electricity program , 2003 .

[7]  Ryuichi Kitamura,et al.  Demand for clean-fuel vehicles in California: A discrete-choice stated preference pilot project , 1993 .

[8]  G. Ewing,et al.  Assessing Consumer Preferences for Clean-Fuel Vehicles: A Discrete Choice Experiment , 2000 .

[9]  Jonn Axsen,et al.  Combining stated and revealed choice research to simulate the neighbor effect: The case of hybrid-electric vehicles , 2009 .

[10]  M. Pierre,et al.  Driving an electric vehicle. A sociological analysis on pioneer users , 2011 .

[11]  Constantine Samaras,et al.  Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from plug-in hybrid vehicles: implications for policy. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  Reid R. Heffner,et al.  Symbolism in California’s Early Market for Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2007 .

[13]  Galen Barbose,et al.  Tracking the Sun VII: An Historical Summary of the Installed Price of Photovoltaics in the United States from 1998 to 2013 , 2012 .

[14]  Christopher Yang,et al.  Plug-in Hybrid Vehicle GHG Impacts in California: Integrating Consumer-Informed Recharge Profiles with an Electricity-Dispatch Model , 2011 .

[15]  Adam Faiers,et al.  Consumer attitudes towards domestic solar power systems , 2006 .

[16]  Daniel Sperling,et al.  Testing Electric Vehicle Demand in `Hybrid Households' Using a Reflexive Survey , 1996 .

[17]  Environmental Assessment of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles Volume 1 : Nationwide Greenhouse Gas Emissions , 2007 .

[18]  Kenneth S Kurani,et al.  Households’ Stories of Their Encounters With a Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle , 2012 .

[19]  L. Bird,et al.  Green Power Marketing in the United States: A Status Report (2008 Data) , 2009 .

[20]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Constructive Consumer Choice Processes , 1998 .

[21]  Ivan Diaz-Rainey,et al.  Profiling potential green electricity tariff adopters: green consumerism as an environmental policy tool? , 2011 .

[22]  Jonn Axsen,et al.  Batteries for PHEVs , 2010 .

[23]  Ryan Wiser,et al.  Using contingent valuation to explore willingness to pay for renewable energy: A comparison of collective and voluntary payment vehicles , 2002 .

[24]  Meryl P. Gardner,et al.  Willingness to pay for electric vehicles and their attributes , 2011 .

[25]  A. Ditta How helpful is nanotechnology in agriculture? , 2012 .

[26]  Jonn Axsen,et al.  Interpersonal Influence within Car Buyers' Social Networks: Applying Five Perspectives to Plug-in Hybrid Vehicle Drivers , 2012 .

[27]  Matthew A Kromer,et al.  Electric powertrains : opportunities and challenges in the US light-duty vehicle fleet , 2007 .

[28]  R. Costanza,et al.  The evolution of preferences Why 'sovereign' preferences may not lead to sustainable policies and what to do about it , 1998 .

[29]  Paul Parker,et al.  CONSUMERS AND GREEN ELECTRICITY: PROFILING POTENTIAL PURCHASERS , 2003 .

[30]  B. Roe,et al.  US consumers' willingness to pay for green electricity , 2001 .

[31]  Kenneth Train,et al.  The potential market for non-gasoline-powered automobiles , 1980 .

[32]  T. Gärling,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL DETERMINANTS OF ATTITUDE TOWARDS AND WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR GREEN ELECTRICITY , 2008 .

[33]  Vilja Varho,et al.  Consumers in the green electricity market in Finland , 2006 .

[34]  R. Ozaki Adopting sustainable innovation: what makes consumers sign up to green electricity? , 2011 .

[35]  Thomas S Turrentine,et al.  The UC Davis MINI E Consumer Study , 2011 .

[36]  Allison M. Borchers,et al.  Does willingness to pay for green energy differ by source? A contingent choice experiment , 2007 .