Blurring the boundaries between frame-based and frameless stereotaxy: feasibility study for brain biopsies performed with the use of a head-mounted robot.

OBJECT Frame-based stereotactic interventions are considered the gold standard for brain biopsies, but they have limitations with regard to flexibility and patient comfort because of the bulky head ring attached to the patient. Frameless image guidance systems that use scalp fiducial markers offer more flexibility and patient comfort but provide less stability and accuracy during drilling and biopsy needle positioning. Head-mounted robot-guided biopsies could provide the advantages of these 2 techniques without the downsides. The goal of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a robotic guidance device, affixed to the patient's skull through a small mounting platform, for use in brain biopsy procedures. METHODS This was a retrospective study of 37 consecutive patients who presented with supratentorial lesions and underwent brain biopsy procedures in which a surgical guidance robot was used to determine clinical outcomes and technical procedural operability. RESULTS The portable head-mounted device was well tolerated by the patients and enabled stable drilling and needle positioning during surgery. Flexible adjustments of predefined paths and selection of new trajectories were successfully performed intraoperatively without the need for manual settings and fixations. The patients experienced no permanent deficits or infections after surgery. CONCLUSIONS The head-mounted robot-guided approach presented here combines the stability of a bone-mounted set-up with the flexibility and tolerability of frameless systems. By reducing human interference (i.e., manual parameter settings, calibrations, and adjustments), this technology might be particularly useful in neurosurgical interventions that necessitate multiple trajectories.

[1]  E. Air,et al.  Comparing the risks of frameless stereotactic biopsy in eloquent and noneloquent regions of the brain: a retrospective review of 284 cases. , 2009, Journal of neurosurgery.

[2]  Gerlig Widmann,et al.  Frameless stereotactic targeting devices: technical features, targeting errors and clinical results , 2012, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[3]  D. Roberts,et al.  Frameless robotically targeted stereotactic brain biopsy: feasibility, diagnostic yield, and safety. , 2012, Journal of neurosurgery.

[4]  Leo Joskowicz,et al.  Bone-mounted miniature robot for surgical procedures: Concept and clinical applications , 2003, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[5]  J. Engh,et al.  Image-guided frameless stereotactic needle biopsy in awake patients without the use of rigid head fixation. , 2011, Journal of neurosurgery.

[6]  L. Lemieux,et al.  Accuracy in frame-based and frameless stereotaxy. , 1993, Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery.

[7]  S. Hayati,et al.  A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  I. Germano,et al.  Clinical evaluation of multimodality registration in frameless stereotaxy. , 1999, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[9]  D. Thomas,et al.  The advantages of frameless stereotactic biopsy over frame-based biopsy , 2002, British journal of neurosurgery.

[10]  Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa,et al.  Frame-based stereotactic biopsy remains an important diagnostic tool with distinct advantages over frameless stereotactic biopsy , 2005, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[11]  Mark E. Linskey,et al.  Frame-based stereotaxy in a frameless era: current capabilities, relative role, and the positive- and negative predictive values of blood through the needle , 2009, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[12]  Devices for targeting the needle. , 2009, Neurosurgery clinics of North America.

[13]  M. Viergever,et al.  Neuronavigation and surgery of intracerebral tumours , 2006, Journal of Neurology.

[14]  D Glauser,et al.  Neurosurgical robot Minerva: first results and current developments. , 1995, Journal of image guided surgery.

[15]  R. Maciunas,et al.  The application accuracy of stereotactic frames. , 1994, Neurosurgery.

[16]  Abhilash Pandya,et al.  The application accuracy of the NeuroMate robot--A quantitative comparison with frameless and frame-based surgical localization systems. , 2002, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[17]  J. Michael Fitzpatrick,et al.  Robotically-adjustable microstereotactic frames for image-guided neurosurgery , 2013, Medical Imaging.

[18]  D. Thomas,et al.  Accuracy of true frameless stereotaxy: in vivo measurement and laboratory phantom studies. Technical note. , 1999, Journal of neurosurgery.

[19]  Alessandro Olivi,et al.  Accuracy of frameless and frame-based image-guided stereotactic brain biopsy in the diagnosis of glioma: comparison of biopsy and open resection specimen , 2005, Neurological research.