Biominiaturization of Bioreactors

Bioprocess development largely parallels the drug discovery process. Screening a large number of experimental conditions in the early stages, is required. As scales increase through the pilot to the manufacturing stage, process conditions get more stringent in terms of variation. Ideally, one would like the same quality of process information, independent of scale. Traditionally, early stage experiments to optimize growth media and cultivation parameters have been carried out in flasks and liter-scale bioreactors. This has often resulted in slow development timelines due to a lack of information in the former and the low-throughput nature of the latter. To circumvent these drawbacks in traditional technologies, much effort has been directed toward developing small-scale culturing platforms with monitoring and control capabilities that would mimic production conditions. Such systems would enable more experiments to be carried out simultaneously without compromising the quality of information obtained. In this review, traditional as well as novel systems with monitoring and control capabilities are discussed. We have focused on their application in culture and, in many cases, comparison to larger scale systems. Many small-scale systems have performances comparable to lab-scale bioreactors. These advances should allow for much more efficient process development as well as impact other areas such as bioprospecting, where hitherto “uncultivable” species may now be grown by screening samples for growth under matrices of conditions that were previously impractical. Another area of impact will be to allow industry to more readily incorporate process analytical technologies. Keywords: bioreactor; small scale; optical sensor; high throughput bioprocessing

[1]  D Weuster-Botz,et al.  Parallel substrate feeding and pH-control in shaking-flasks. , 2001, Biochemical engineering journal.

[2]  J Büchs,et al.  Introduction to advantages and problems of shaken cultures. , 2001, Biochemical engineering journal.

[3]  Florian M. Wurm,et al.  Small-scale bioreactor system for process development and optimization , 2001 .

[4]  Jonathan I. Betts,et al.  Characterization and Application of a Miniature 10 mL Stirred‐Tank Bioreactor, Showing Scale‐Down Equivalence with a Conventional 7 L Reactor , 2006, Biotechnology progress.

[5]  Leah Tolosa,et al.  Noninvasive measurement of dissolved oxygen in shake flasks. , 2002, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[6]  G. Rao,et al.  A study of oxygen transfer in shake flasks using a non‐invasive oxygen sensor , 2003, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[7]  J. Büchs,et al.  Effect of Oxygen Limitation and Medium Composition on Escherichia coli Fermentation in Shake‐Flask Cultures , 2004, Biotechnology progress.

[8]  F. Muzzio,et al.  Computational and experimental investigation of flow and particle settling in a roller bottle bioreactor. , 1999, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[9]  J. Schultz,et al.  COTTON CLOSURE AS AN AERATION BARRIER IN SHAKEN FLASK FERMENTATIONS. , 1964, Applied microbiology.

[10]  Mark R. Marten,et al.  Optical analysis of liquid mixing in a minibioreactor , 2006, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[11]  S. A. Miller,et al.  Performance of Agitated Gas-Liquid Contactors , 1944 .

[12]  Nicolas Szita,et al.  A well‐mixed, polymer‐based microbioreactor with integrated optical measurements , 2006, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[13]  Ingo Klimant,et al.  Integrated optical sensing of dissolved oxygen in microtiter plates: A novel tool for microbial cultivation , 2003, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[14]  Renate Kunert,et al.  Process parameter shifting: Part I. Effect of DOT, pH, and temperature on the performance of Epo‐Fc expressing CHO cells cultivated in controlled batch bioreactors , 2006, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[15]  Harry L. T. Lee,et al.  Microbioreactor arrays with integrated mixers and fluid injectors for high-throughput experimentation with pH and dissolved oxygen control. , 2006, Lab on a chip.

[16]  Yinjie J. Tang,et al.  Evaluation of the effects of various culture conditions on Cr(VI) reduction by Shewanella oneidensis MR‐1 in a novel high‐throughput mini‐bioreactor , 2006, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[17]  A. E. Humphrey,et al.  Estimation of Fermentation Biomass Concentration by Measuring Culture Fluorescence , 1978, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[18]  Yordan Kostov,et al.  Design and performance of a 24‐station high throughput microbioreactor , 2006, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[19]  Peter Neubauer,et al.  Microbial Cell Factories a New Wireless System for Decentralised Measurement of Physiological Parameters from Shake Flasks , 2006 .

[20]  Oxygen limitation is a pitfall during screening for industrial strains , 2006, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[21]  B O Palsson,et al.  Growth, Metabolic, and Antibody Production Kinetics of Hybridoma Cell Culture: 2. Effects of Serum Concentration, Dissolved Oxygen Concentration, and Medium pH in a Batch Reactor , 1991, Biotechnology progress.

[22]  Robert Hermann,et al.  Methods for Intense Aeration, Growth, Storage, and Replication of Bacterial Strains in Microtiter Plates , 2000, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[23]  C. Briens,et al.  Determination of the volumetric mass transfer coefficient (k(L)a) using the dynamic "gas out-gas in" method: Analysis of errors caused by dissolved oxygen probes. , 1995, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[24]  Govind Rao,et al.  Phase fluorometric sterilizable optical oxygen sensor , 1994, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[25]  B Allen,et al.  Design of a prototype miniature bioreactor for high throughput automated bioprocessing , 2003 .

[26]  Ashraf Amanullah,et al.  Twenty‐four‐well plate miniature bioreactor high‐throughput system: Assessment for microbial cultivations , 2007, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[27]  F. Muzzio,et al.  Computational and experimental investigation of flow and fluid mixing in the roller bottle bioreactor. , 2000, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[28]  Christoph Wittmann,et al.  Characterization and application of an optical sensor for quantification of dissolved O2 in shake-flasks , 2003, Biotechnology Letters.

[29]  J. Büchs,et al.  Device for sterile online measurement of the oxygen transfer rate in shaking flasks. , 2001, Biochemical engineering journal.

[30]  Frank Kensy,et al.  Oxygen transfer phenomena in 48-well microtiter plates: determination by optical monitoring of sulfite oxidation and verification by real-time measurement during microbial growth. , 2005, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[31]  Jochen Büchs,et al.  Hydromechanical stress in shake flasks: Correlation for the maximum local energy dissipation rate , 2006, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[32]  J Büchs,et al.  Power consumption in shaking flasks on rotary shaking machines: I. Power consumption measurement in unbaffled flasks at low liquid viscosity. , 2000, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[33]  Fahir Borak,et al.  Bubble column reactors , 2005 .

[34]  Nicolas Szita,et al.  Membrane‐aerated microbioreactor for high‐throughput bioprocessing , 2004, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[35]  J Büchs,et al.  Quasi-continuous combined scattered light and fluorescence measurements: a novel measurement technique for shaken microtiter plates. , 2005, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[36]  D. Weuster‐Botz,et al.  Process-engineering characterization of small-scale bubble columns for microbial process development , 2001 .

[37]  Xudong Ge,et al.  Validation of an optical sensor-based high-throughput bioreactor system for mammalian cell culture. , 2006, Journal of biotechnology.

[38]  J. Büchs,et al.  Characterization of gas-liquid mass transfer phenomena in microtiter plates. , 2003, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[39]  Nicolas Szita,et al.  Development of a multiplexed microbioreactor system for high-throughput bioprocessing. , 2005, Lab on a chip.

[40]  Frank Baganz,et al.  Characterization of Oxygen Transfer in Miniature and Lab‐Scale Bubble Column Bioreactors and Comparison of Microbial Growth Performance Based on Constant kLa , 2008, Biotechnology progress.

[41]  Klavs F. Jensen,et al.  Gene expression analysis of Escherichia coli grown in miniaturized bioreactor platforms for high-throughput analysis of growth and genomic data , 2005, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[42]  D Weuster-Botz,et al.  Development, parallelization, and automation of a gas-inducing milliliter-scale bioreactor for high-throughput bioprocess design (HTBD). , 2005, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[43]  Jochen Büchs,et al.  A Novel Parallel Shaken Bioreactor System for Continuous Operation , 2004, Biotechnology progress.

[44]  Yordan Kostov,et al.  Dual Excitation Ratiometric Fluorescent pH Sensor for Noninvasive Bioprocess Monitoring: Development and Application , 2002, Biotechnology progress.

[45]  H. Munier-Lehmann,et al.  Multiple Microfermentor Battery: a Versatile Tool for Use with Automated Parallel Cultures of Microorganisms Producing Recombinant Proteins and for Optimization of Cultivation Protocols , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[46]  J Büchs,et al.  Characterisation of operation conditions and online monitoring of physiological culture parameters in shaken 24-well microtiter plates , 2005, Bioprocess and biosystems engineering.

[47]  Arthur E. Humphrey,et al.  Shake Flask to Fermentor: What Have We Learned? , 1998 .

[48]  Ingo Klimant,et al.  Modeling of Mixing in 96‐Well Microplates Observed with Fluorescence Indicators , 2002, Biotechnology progress.

[49]  G. Rao,et al.  Low-cost microbioreactor for high-throughput bioprocessing. , 2001, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[50]  G. Rao,et al.  Noninvasive oxygen measurements and mass transfer considerations in tissue culture flasks , 2000, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[51]  Luke P. Lee,et al.  Nanoliter scale microbioreactor array for quantitative cell biology , 2006, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[52]  J Büchs,et al.  Optical method for the determination of the oxygen-transfer capacity of small bioreactors based on sulfite oxidation. , 2001, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[53]  J. Teixeira,et al.  Proof‐of‐concept of a novel micro‐bioreactor for fast development of industrial bioprocesses , 2006, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[54]  Stephan A. Freyer,et al.  Validating shaking flasks as representative screening systems , 2004 .

[55]  J. Büchs,et al.  Mass transfer resistance of sterile plugs in shaking bioreactors. , 2001, Biochemical engineering journal.

[56]  Philippe Girard,et al.  TubeSpin satellites: a fast track approach for process development with animal cells using shaking technology , 2004 .

[57]  G. Hill,et al.  Closure effects on oxygen transfer and aerobic growth in shake flasks , 2006, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[58]  E. Papoutsakis,et al.  Fluid‐mechanical forces in agitated bioreactors reduce the CD13 and CD33 surface protein content of HL60 cells , 1993, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[59]  W. Bentley,et al.  Green fluorescent protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: real-time studies of the GAL1 promoter. , 2000, Biotechnology and bioengineering.