To Wait or Not to Wait—Separate Mechanisms in the Oculomotor Circuit of Basal Ganglia

We reach a goal immediately after detecting the target, or later by withholding the immediate action. Each time, we choose one of these actions by suppressing the other. How does the brain control these antagonistic actions? We hypothesized that the output of basal ganglia (BG), substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr), suppresses antagonistic oculomotor signals by sending strong inhibitory output to superior colliculus (SC). To test this hypothesis, we trained monkeys to perform two kinds of saccade task: Immediate (visually guided) and delayed (visually-withheld but memory-guided) saccade tasks. In both tasks, we applied one-direction-reward (1DR) procedure to modify the level of goal-reaching motivation. We identified SNr neurons that projected to SC by their antidromic activation from SC. We stimulated SC on both sides because SNr neurons projecting to the ipsilateral SC (ipsiSC) and those projecting to the contralateral SC (contraSC) might have antagonistic functions. First, we found that ipsiSC-projecting neurons were about 10 times more than contraSC-projecting neurons. More importantly, ipsiSC-projecting SNr neurons were roughly divided into two groups which would control immediate and delayed saccades separately. The immediate-type SNr neurons were clearly inhibited by a visual target on the contralateral side in both visual- and memory-1DR tasks. The inhibition would disinhibit SC neurons and facilitate a saccade to the contralateral target. This is goal-directed in visual-1DR task, but is erroneous in memory-1DR task. In contrast, the delayed-type SNr neurons tended to be excited by a visual target (especially on the contralateral side), which would suppress the immediate saccade to the target. Instead, they were inhibited before a delayed (memory-guided) saccade directed to the contralateral side, which would facilitate the saccade. ContraSC-projecting SNr neurons were more variable with no grouped features, although some of them may contribute to the saccade to the ipsilateral target. Finally, we found that some ipsiSC-projecting SNr neurons were inhibited more strongly when reward was expected, which was associated with shortened saccade reaction times. However, many SNr neurons showed no reward-expectation effect. These results suggest that two separate oculomotor circuits exist in BG, both of which contribute to goal-directed behavior, but in different temporal contexts.

[1]  B. Stein,et al.  Opposing basal ganglia processes shape midbrain visuomotor activity bilaterally , 2003, Nature.

[2]  D. Robinson.  Eye movements evoked by collicular stimulation in the alert monkey. , 1972, Vision research.

[3]  E. T. Rolls,et al.  Responses of striatal neurons in the behaving monkey. 3. Effects of iontophoretically applied dopamine on normal responsiveness , 1984, Neuroscience.

[4]  J. Mink.  THE BASAL GANGLIA: FOCUSED SELECTION AND INHIBITION OF COMPETING MOTOR PROGRAMS , 1996, Progress in Neurobiology.

[5]  P. Glimcher,et al.  Action and Outcome Encoding in the Primate Caudate Nucleus , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  S. Thorpe,et al.  Responses of striatal neurons in the behaving monkey. 1. Head of the caudate nucleus , 1983, Behavioural Brain Research.

[7]  Okihide Hikosaka,et al.  Role of Primate Substantia Nigra Pars Reticulata in Reward-Oriented Saccadic Eye Movement , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  A. Toga,et al.  The Rhesus Monkey Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates , 1999 .

[9]  Y. Smith,et al.  Convergence of synaptic inputs from the striatum and the globus pallidus onto identified nigrocollicular cells in the rat: A double anterograde labelling study , 1991, Neuroscience.

[10]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  Functional properties of monkey caudate neurons. I. Activities related to saccadic eye movements. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  Role of the basal ganglia in the control of purposive saccadic eye movements. , 2000, Physiological reviews.

[12]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Visual and oculomotor functions of monkey substantia nigra pars reticulata. IV. Relation of substantia nigra to superior colliculus. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  Expectation of reward modulates cognitive signals in the basal ganglia , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  C. Gerfen,et al.  Crossed connections of the substantia nigra in the rat , 1982, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[15]  S B Edwards,et al.  A comparison of the intranigral distribution of nigrotectal neurons labeled with horseradish peroxidase in the monkey, cat, and rat , 1981, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  Hyoung F. Kim,et al.  Basal ganglia circuits for reward value-guided behavior. , 2014, Annual review of neuroscience.

[17]  Y. Smith,et al.  The output neurones and the dopaminergic neurones of the substantia nigra receive a GABA‐Containing input from the globus pallidus in the rat , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[18]  P. May.  The mammalian superior colliculus: laminar structure and connections. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[19]  W. Precht,et al.  Blockage of caudate-evoked inhibition of neurons in the substantia nigra by picrotoxin. , 1971, Brain research.

[20]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Activity of superior colliculus in behaving monkey. 3. Cells discharging before eye movements. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  N. Logothetis,et al.  A combined MRI and histology atlas of the rhesus monkey brain in stereotaxic coordinates , 2007 .

[22]  M. Hayhoe,et al.  In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities? , 2001, Vision Research.

[23]  R. Rhoades,et al.  Indirect visual cortical input to the deep layers of the hamster's superior colliculus via the basal ganglia , 1982, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[24]  André Parent,et al.  The pallidointralaminar and pallidonigral projections in primate as studied by retrograde double-labeling method , 1983, Brain Research.

[25]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  A neural correlate of response bias in monkey caudate nucleus , 2002, Nature.

[26]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Visual and oculomotor functions of monkey substantia nigra pars reticulata. III. Memory-contingent visual and saccade responses. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Okihide Hikosaka,et al.  A neural correlate of motivational conflict in the superior colliculus of the macaque. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  A. Graybiel.  Neurotransmitters and neuromodulators in the basal ganglia , 1990, Trends in Neurosciences.

[29]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  Functional territories in primate substantia nigra pars reticulata separately signaling stable and flexible values. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  O Hikosaka,et al.  Functional properties of monkey caudate neurons. II. Visual and auditory responses. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  J. K. Harting,et al.  Nigrotectal projections in the primate Galago crassicaudatus , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  Peter Redgrave,et al.  Basal Ganglia , 2020, Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders.

[33]  F. A. Steiner.  Neurotransmitters and Neuromodulators , 1974 .

[34]  M. Carpenter,et al.  Nigrotectal projections in the monkey: An autoradiographic study , 1977, Brain Research.

[35]  H. Kita.  Globus pallidus external segment. , 2007, Progress in brain research.

[36]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  Robust Representation of Stable Object Values in the Oculomotor Basal Ganglia , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  Hyoung F. Kim,et al.  Distinct Basal Ganglia Circuits Controlling Behaviors Guided by Flexible and Stable Values , 2013, Neuron.

[38]  Kevin W. Bowyer,et al.  The Functional Properties , 1996 .