Random-walk models of cell dispersal included in mechanobiological simulations of tissue differentiation.

Computational models have shown that biophysical stimuli can be correlated with observed patterns of tissue differentiation, and simulations have been performed that predict the time course of tissue differentiation in, for example, long bone fracture healing. Some simulations have used a diffusion model to simulate the migration and proliferation of cells with the differentiating tissue. However, despite the convenience of the diffusion model, diffusion is not the mechanism of cell dispersal: cells disperse by crawling or proliferation, or are transported in a moving fluid. In this paper, a random-walk model (i.e., a stochastic model), with and without a preferred direction, is studied as an approach to simulate cell proliferation/migration in differentiating tissues and it is compared with the diffusion model. A simulation of tissue differentiation of gap tissue in a two-dimensional model of a bone/implant interface was performed to demonstrate the differences between diffusion vs. random walk with a preferred direction. Results of diffusion and random-walk models are similar with respect to the change in the stiffness of the gap tissue but rather different results are obtained regarding tissue patterning in the differentiating tissues; the diffusion approach predicted continuous patterns of tissue differentiation whereas the random-walk model showed a more discontinuous pattern-histological results are not available that can unequivocally establish which is most similar to experimental observation. Comparing isotropic to anisotropic random walk (preferred direction of proliferation and cell migration), a more rapid reduction of the relative displacement between implant and bone is predicted. In conclusion, we have shown how random-walk models of cell dispersal and proliferation can be implemented, and shown where differences between them exist. Further study of the random-walk model is warranted, given the importance of cell seeding and cell dispersal/proliferation in many mechanobiological problems.

[1]  P J Prendergast,et al.  Biophysical stimuli on cells during tissue differentiation at implant interfaces , 1997 .

[2]  J. Davies,et al.  Mechanisms of endosseous integration. , 1998, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[3]  Georg N Duda,et al.  On the influence of mechanical conditions in osteochondral defect healing. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  P J Prendergast,et al.  Mechano-regulation of stem cell differentiation and tissue regeneration in osteochondral defects. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  U. Holzwarth,et al.  Effect of surface finish on the osseointegration of laser-treated titanium alloy implants. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[6]  B D Boyan,et al.  Surface roughness modulates the local production of growth factors and cytokines by osteoblast-like MG-63 cells. , 1996, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[7]  P. Prendergast,et al.  A mechano-regulation model for tissue differentiation during fracture healing: analysis of gap size and loading. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  Rik Huiskes,et al.  Comparison of biophysical stimuli for mechano-regulation of tissue differentiation during fracture healing. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  M J Gómez-Benito,et al.  Influence of fracture gap size on the pattern of long bone healing: a computational study. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  J. M. Garcı́a,et al.  Modelling bone tissue fracture and healing: a review ☆ , 2004 .

[11]  J. Bechtold,et al.  A controlled experimental model of revision implants: Part I. Development , 2001, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[12]  G S Beaupré,et al.  Correlations between mechanical stress history and tissue differentiation in initial fracture healing , 1988, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[13]  Patrick J. Prendergast,et al.  Optimisation of scaffold porosity using a stochastic model for cell proliferation and migration in mechanobiological simulations , 2006 .

[14]  Marjolein C H van der Meulen,et al.  Beneficial effects of moderate, early loading and adverse effects of delayed or excessive loading on bone healing. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  I. Naylor,et al.  The origin and mode of fibroblast migration and proliferation in granulation tissue. , 1998, British journal of plastic surgery.

[16]  M H Gail,et al.  The locomotion of mouse fibroblasts in tissue culture. , 1970, Biophysical journal.

[17]  E. J. Ambrose The movements of fibrocytes. , 1961, Experimental cell research.

[18]  S. Carter,et al.  Principles of Cell Motility: The Direction of Cell Movement and Cancer Invasion , 1965, Nature.

[19]  P J Prendergast,et al.  Bone ingrowth simulation for a concept glenoid component design. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  R. Huiskes,et al.  A biomechanical regulatory model for periprosthetic fibrous-tissue differentiation , 1997, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[21]  F van Keulen,et al.  Numerical simulation of tissue differentiation around loaded titanium implants in a bone chamber. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  Patrick J Prendergast,et al.  Prediction of the optimal mechanical properties for a scaffold used in osteochondral defect repair. , 2006, Tissue engineering.

[23]  Robert Lanza,et al.  Essentials of stem cell biology , 2009 .

[24]  Rik Huiskes,et al.  Why mechanobiology? A survey article. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  L. Claes,et al.  Magnitudes of local stress and strain along bony surfaces predict the course and type of fracture healing. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  P. Maini,et al.  Role of fibroblast migration in collagen fiber formation during fetal and adult dermal wound healing. , 1997, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[27]  G S Beaupré,et al.  Role of mechanical loading in the progressive ossification of a fracture callus , 1989, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[28]  Michael T Longaker,et al.  Relationships between tissue dilatation and differentiation in distraction osteogenesis. , 2006, Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology.

[29]  G. Beaupré,et al.  Skeletal Function and Form: Mechanobiology of Skeletal Development, Aging, and Regeneration , 2003 .

[30]  R T Tranquillo,et al.  Continuum model of fibroblast-driven wound contraction: inflammation-mediation. , 1992, Journal of theoretical biology.

[31]  C. McCulloch,et al.  Analysis of intracellular osteopontin as a marker of osteoblastic cell differentiation and mesenchymal cell migration. , 1998, European journal of oral sciences.

[32]  J. Lewis,et al.  Mechanical properties of the fibrous tissue found at the bone-cement interface following total joint replacement. , 1982, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[33]  D. Lacroix,et al.  Biomechanical model to simulate tissue differentiation and bone regeneration: Application to fracture healing , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[34]  Manuel Doblaré,et al.  Computational Bioengineering - Current Trends and Applications , 2004 .

[35]  D Buser,et al.  Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. , 1991, Journal of biomedical materials research.