Attitudes, Ideologies and Self-Organization: Information Load Minimization in Multi-Agent Decision Making

Sophisticated models of human social behavior are fast becoming highly desirable in an increasingly complex and interrelated world. Here, we propose that rather than taking established theories from the physical sciences and naively mapping them into the social world, the advanced concepts and theories of social psychology should be taken as a starting point, and used to develop a new modeling methodology. In order to illustrate how such an approach might be carried out, we attempt to model the low elaboration attitude changes of a society of agents in an evolving social context. We propose a geometric model of an agent in context, where individual agent attitudes are seen to self-organize to form ideologies, which then serve to guide further agent-based attitude changes. A computational implementation of the model is shown to exhibit a number of interesting phenomena, including a tendency for a measure of the entropy in the system to decrease, and a potential for externally guiding a population of agents toward a new desired ideology.

[1]  R. Dacey Theory absorption and the testability of economic theory , 1976 .

[2]  B. Gray Strong opposition: frame‐based resistance to collaboration , 2004 .

[3]  Keith Beven,et al.  A manifesto for the equifinality thesis , 2006 .

[4]  I. Ajzen Attitudes, Personality and Behavior , 1988 .

[5]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Toward a Relational Concept of Uncertainty: about Knowing Too Little, Knowing Too Differently, and Accepting Not to Know , 2008 .

[6]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Decision theory with prospect interference and entanglement , 2011, ArXiv.

[7]  P. Costa,et al.  Normal Personality Assessment in Clinical Practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. , 1992 .

[8]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[9]  J. Crutchfield The calculi of emergence: computation, dynamics and induction , 1994 .

[10]  S. Asch Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. , 1956 .

[11]  A. Tversky,et al.  Thinking through uncertainty: Nonconsequential reasoning and choice , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  Varol Akman,et al.  Steps Toward Formalizing Context , 1996, AI Mag..

[13]  Thomas Martens,et al.  Designing environmental campaigns by using agent-based simulations: strategies for changing environmental attitudes. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[14]  Aaron Wildavsky,et al.  Choosing Preferences by Constructing Institutions: A Cultural Theory of Preference Formation , 1987, American Political Science Review.

[15]  I. Walker,et al.  Social Cognition: An Integrated Introduction , 1996 .

[16]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. , 1998 .

[17]  R. Bond,et al.  Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch's (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. , 1996 .

[18]  Polly Bart,et al.  Heuristic Methods for Estimating the Generalized Vertex Median of a Weighted Graph , 1968, Oper. Res..

[19]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[20]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Ubiquitous Quantum Structure , 2010 .

[21]  Ronald D. Brunner Predictions and policy decisions , 1999 .

[22]  Fabio Boschetti,et al.  A Turing Test for Emergence , 2008, Advances in Applied Self-organizing Systems.

[23]  William Ascher The ambiguous nature of forecasts in project evaluation: Diagnosing the over-optimism of rate-of-return analysis , 1993 .

[24]  K. Beven Towards a coherent philosophy for modelling the environment , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[25]  Christian List,et al.  The theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review , 2012, Synthese.

[26]  Jennifer S Trueblood,et al.  A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors. , 2011, Psychological review.

[27]  Christopher Isham,et al.  Lectures On Quantum Theory: Mathematical And Structural Foundations , 1995 .

[28]  Sasa Buvac,et al.  Introduction: Toward a Unified Theory of Context? , 1998, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[29]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Memory for Fact, Fiction, and Misinformation , 2005, Psychological science.

[30]  Jennifer Price,et al.  Fourth annual survey of Australian attitudes to climate change: interim report , 2014 .

[31]  Z. Leviston,et al.  Beliefs and Denials About Climate Change: An Australian Perspective , 2012 .

[32]  Fabio Boschetti,et al.  The Effects of Personality in a Social Context , 2013, CogSci.

[33]  R. Gifford,et al.  Free-Market Ideology and Environmental Degradation , 2006 .

[34]  Corinna Elsenbroich,et al.  Explanation in Agent-Based Modelling: Functions, Causality or Mechanisms? , 2012, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[35]  Graeme Hirst,et al.  Context as a Spurious Concept , 1997, ArXiv.

[36]  BrézillonPatrick Context in problem solving: a survey , 1999 .

[37]  Hans-Joachim Mosler,et al.  Computer Simulation as a Method of Further Developing a Theory: Simulating the Elaboration Likelihood Model , 2001 .

[38]  S. Chaiken The heuristic model of persuasion. , 1987 .

[39]  M. Douglas Risk Acceptability According to the Social Sciences , 1986 .

[40]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[41]  R. Sorrentino,et al.  The Uncertain Mind: Individual Differences in Facing the Unknown , 2002 .

[42]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Causal inferences about communicators and their effect on opinion change , 1978 .

[43]  Patrick Brézillon,et al.  Context in problem solving: a survey , 1999, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[44]  C. Frith Social cognition , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[45]  Mikhail Prokopenko,et al.  An information-theoretic primer on complexity, self-organization, and emergence , 2009, Complex..

[46]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Formalizing Context (Expanded Notes) , 1994 .

[47]  Joel Cooper,et al.  Cognitive Dissonance: Fifty Years of a Classic Theory , 2007 .

[48]  Fabio Boschetti,et al.  Modelling = conditional prediction , 2011 .

[49]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Statistical physics of social dynamics , 2007, 0710.3256.

[50]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Social cognition, 2nd ed. , 1991 .

[51]  F. Boschetti,et al.  Assessing attitudes and cognitive styles of stakeholders in environmental projects involving computer modelling , 2012 .

[52]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The Second National Risk and Culture Study: Making Sense of - and Making Progress In - The American Culture War of Fact , 2007 .

[53]  J. Busemeyer,et al.  A quantum probability explanation for violations of ‘rational’ decision theory , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[54]  M. Banaji,et al.  Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. , 1995, Psychological review.

[55]  L. Steg,et al.  Cultural Theory and Individual Perceptions of Environmental Risks , 2000 .

[56]  Fabio Boschetti,et al.  How Computational Models Predict the Behavior of Complex Systems , 2012, Foundations of Science.

[57]  John S. Seiter,et al.  Persuasion: Social Inflence and Compliance Gaining , 2015 .

[58]  Jill S. Schneiderman The Earth Around Us: Maintaining A Livable Planet , 2000 .

[59]  E. J. O'Brien,et al.  The person-situation debate in historical and current perspective. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[60]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision , 2012 .

[61]  James P. Crutchfield,et al.  Computational Mechanics: Pattern and Prediction, Structure and Simplicity , 1999, ArXiv.

[62]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Ubiquitous Quantum Structure: From Psychology to Finance , 2010 .

[63]  Keith Beven,et al.  Towards a coherent philosophy for environmental modelling. , 2002 .

[64]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.