Towards Accurate Quantum Chemical Calculations on Noisy Quantum Computers

Variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) is a hybrid quantum-classical algorithm designed for noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) computers. It is promising for quantum chemical calculations (QCC) because it can calculate the ground-state energy of a target molecule. Although VQE has a potential to achieve a higher accuracy than classical approximation methods in QCC, it is challenging to achieve it on current NISQ computers due to the significant impact of noises. Density matrix embedding theory (DMET) is a well-known technique to divide a molecule into multiple fragments, which is available to mitigate the noise impact on VQE. However, our preliminary evaluation shows that the naive combination of DMET and VQE does not outperform a gold standard classical method. In this work, we present three approaches to mitigate the noise impact for the DMET+VQE combination. (1) The size of quantum circuits used by VQE is decreased by reducing the number of bath orbitals which represent interactions between multiple fragments in DMET. (2) Reduced density matrices (RDMs), which are used to calculate a molecular energy in DMET, are calculated accurately based on expectation values obtained by executing quantum circuits using a noise-less quantum computer simulator. (3) The parameters of a quantum circuit optimized by VQE are refined with mathematical post-processing. The evaluation using a noisy quantum computer simulator shows that our approaches significantly improve the accuracy of the DMET+VQE combination. Moreover, we demonstrate that on a real NISQ device, the DMET+VQE combination applying our three approaches achieves a higher accuracy than the gold standard classical method.

[1]  Jie Liu,et al.  Large-Scale Simulation of Quantum Computational Chemistry on a New Sunway Supercomputer , 2022, SC22: International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis.

[2]  Marc P. Coons,et al.  Tangelo: An Open-source Python Package for End-to-end Chemistry Workflows on Quantum Computers , 2022, 2206.12424.

[3]  W. Lavrijsen,et al.  Accelerating Noisy VQE Optimization with Gaussian Processes , 2022, 2022 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE).

[4]  K. Jansen,et al.  Noisy Bayesian optimization for variational quantum eigensolvers , 2021, Proceedings of The 38th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory — PoS(LATTICE2021).

[5]  George H. Booth,et al.  The Variational Quantum Eigensolver: A review of methods and best practices , 2021, Physics Reports.

[6]  Marc P. Coons,et al.  Optimizing electronic structure simulations on a trapped-ion quantum computer using problem decomposition , 2021, Communications Physics.

[7]  M. Cerezo,et al.  Variational quantum algorithms , 2020, Nature Reviews Physics.

[8]  Jérôme F Gonthier,et al.  Measurements as a roadblock to near-term practical quantum advantage in chemistry: Resource analysis , 2020, Physical Review Research.

[9]  Keisuke Fujii,et al.  Sequential minimal optimization for quantum-classical hybrid algorithms , 2019, Physical Review Research.

[10]  P. Deglmann,et al.  Accuracy and Resource Estimations for Quantum Chemistry on a Near-term Quantum Computer. , 2018, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[11]  Joelle Pineau,et al.  Streaming kernel regression with provably adaptive mean, variance, and regularization , 2017, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[12]  Aditya Gopalan,et al.  On Kernelized Multi-armed Bandits , 2017, ICML.

[13]  Sandeep Sharma,et al.  PySCF: the Python‐based simulations of chemistry framework , 2017, 1701.08223.

[14]  J. Gambetta,et al.  Tapering off qubits to simulate fermionic Hamiltonians , 2017, 1701.08213.

[15]  Bernard Haasdonk,et al.  Convergence rate of the data-independent P-greedy algorithm in kernel-based approximation , 2016, 1612.02672.

[16]  Sébastien Bubeck Convex Optimization: Algorithms and Complexity , 2014, Found. Trends Mach. Learn..

[17]  Jing Zhang,et al.  Jaguar: A high-performance quantum chemistry software program with strengths in life and materials sciences , 2013 .

[18]  Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al.  A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor , 2013, Nature Communications.

[19]  Garnet Kin-Lic Chan,et al.  Density matrix embedding: a simple alternative to dynamical mean-field theory. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[20]  Harry van Zanten,et al.  Information Rates of Nonparametric Gaussian Process Methods , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[21]  O. Dekel,et al.  Optimal Algorithms for Online Convex Optimization with Multi-Point Bandit Feedback. , 2010, COLT 2010.

[22]  R. B. Blakestad,et al.  Randomized Benchmarking of Quantum Gates , 2007, 0707.0963.

[23]  Karol Kowalski,et al.  Renormalized CCSD(T) and CCSD(TQ) approaches: Dissociation of the N2 triple bond , 2000 .

[24]  E. Fradkin,et al.  Jordan-Wigner transformation for quantum-spin systems in two dimensions and fractional statistics. , 1989, Physical review letters.

[25]  Andreas Krause,et al.  Efficient High Dimensional Bayesian Optimization with Additivity and Quadrature Fourier Features , 2018, NeurIPS.

[26]  M. Urner Scattered Data Approximation , 2016 .

[27]  Pluton Pullumbi,et al.  COSMO-RS, From Quantum Chemistry to Fluid Phase Thermodynamics and Drug Design , 2006 .