Classification of Hyperspectral Data Over Urban Areas Using Directional Morphological Profiles and Semi-Supervised Feature Extraction

When using morphological features for the classification of high resolution hyperspectral images from urban areas, one should consider two important issues. The first one is that classical morphological openings and closings degrade the object boundaries and deform the object shapes. Morphological openings and closings by reconstruction can avoid this problem, but this process leads to some undesirable effects. Objects expected to disappear at a certain scale remain present when using morphological openings and closings by reconstruction. The second one is that the morphological profiles (MPs) with different structuring elements and a range of increasing sizes of morphological operators produce high-dimensional data. These high-dimensional data may contain redundant information and create a new challenge for conventional classification methods, especially for the classifiers which are not robust to the Hughes phenomenon. In this paper, we first investigate morphological profiles with partial reconstruction and directional MPs for the classification of high resolution hyperspectral images from urban areas. Secondly, we develop a semi-supervised feature extraction to reduce the dimensionality of the generated morphological profiles for the classification. Experimental results on real urban hyperspectral images demonstrate the efficiency of the considered techniques.

[1]  Li Ma,et al.  Local Manifold Learning-Based $k$ -Nearest-Neighbor for Hyperspectral Image Classification , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  Guangyi Chen,et al.  Dimensionality reduction of hyperspectral imagery using improved locally linear embedding , 2007 .

[3]  Lorenzo Bruzzone,et al.  Classification of Hyperspectral Images With Regularized Linear Discriminant Analysis , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  Jonathan Cheung-Wai Chan,et al.  Improved Classification of VHR Images of Urban Areas Using Directional Morphological Profiles , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  An experiment-based quantitative and comparative analysis of target detection and image classification algorithms for hyperspectral imagery , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[6]  Bor-Chen Kuo,et al.  Kernel Nonparametric Weighted Feature Extraction for Hyperspectral Image Classification , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[7]  Aleksandra Pizurica,et al.  Feature extraction for hyperspectral images based on semi-supervised local discriminant analysis , 2011, 2011 Joint Urban Remote Sensing Event.

[8]  Bor-Chen Kuo,et al.  A Modified Nonparametric Weight Feature Extraction Using Spatial and Spectral Information , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[9]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Morphological Attribute Profiles for the Analysis of Very High Resolution Images , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Classification and feature extraction for remote sensing images from urban areas based on morphological transformations , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[11]  H. Hotelling Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. , 1933 .

[12]  Shuicheng Yan,et al.  Neighborhood preserving embedding , 2005, Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'05) Volume 1.

[13]  P. Switzer,et al.  A transformation for ordering multispectral data in terms of image quality with implications for noise removal , 1988 .

[14]  G. F. Hughes,et al.  On the mean accuracy of statistical pattern recognizers , 1968, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[15]  J. Chanussot,et al.  On the influence of feature reduction for the classification of hyperspectral images based on the extended morphological profile , 2010 .

[16]  Lorenzo Bruzzone,et al.  Extended profiles with morphological attribute filters for the analysis of hyperspectral data , 2010 .

[17]  Pierre Soille,et al.  Advances in mathematical morphology applied to geoscience and remote sensing , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[18]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Classification of Hyperspectral Images by Using Extended Morphological Attribute Profiles and Independent Component Analysis , 2011, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[19]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  A new approach for the morphological segmentation of high-resolution satellite imagery , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[20]  Daoqiang Zhang,et al.  Semisupervised Dimensionality Reduction With Pairwise Constraints for Hyperspectral Image Classification , 2011, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[21]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  Dimensionality reduction and classification of hyperspectral image data using sequences of extended morphological transformations , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[22]  Johannes R. Sveinsson,et al.  Classification of hyperspectral data from urban areas based on extended morphological profiles , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[23]  Gustavo Camps-Valls,et al.  Semi-Supervised Graph-Based Hyperspectral Image Classification , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[24]  Johannes R. Sveinsson,et al.  Spectral and spatial classification of hyperspectral data using SVMs and morphological profiles , 2008, 2007 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[25]  Lorenzo Bruzzone,et al.  A Novel Approach to the Selection of Spatially Invariant Features for the Classification of Hyperspectral Images With Improved Generalization Capability , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[26]  G. Foody Thematic map comparison: Evaluating the statistical significance of differences in classification accuracy , 2004 .

[27]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Classification of hyperspectral images with Extended Attribute Profiles and feature extraction techniques , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[28]  Bor-Chen Kuo,et al.  Hyperspectral Image Classification Using Kernel-based Nonparametric Weighted Feature Extraction , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[29]  José Crespo,et al.  Theoretical aspects of morphological filters by reconstruction , 1995, Signal Process..

[30]  Xiaojin Zhu,et al.  --1 CONTENTS , 2006 .

[31]  Lorenzo Bruzzone,et al.  A Novel Transductive SVM for Semisupervised Classification of Remote-Sensing Images , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[32]  Avrim Blum,et al.  The Bottleneck , 2021, Monopsony Capitalism.

[33]  Bor-Chen Kuo,et al.  Nonparametric weighted feature extraction for classification , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[34]  Pierre Soille,et al.  Morphological Image Analysis: Principles and Applications , 2003 .

[35]  Bor-Chen Kuo,et al.  Double Nearest Proportion Feature Extraction for Hyperspectral-Image Classification , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[36]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Kernel Principal Component Analysis for the Classification of Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Data over Urban Areas , 2009, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[37]  Qian Du,et al.  Modified Fisher's Linear Discriminant Analysis for Hyperspectral Imagery , 2007, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.