Do Pedagogical Agents Enhance Software Training?
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. Moreno,et al. Students' choice of animated pedagogical agents in science learning: A test of the similarity-attraction hypothesis on gender and ethnicity , 2006 .
[2] P. Pintrich,et al. Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications , 1995 .
[3] Hans van der Meij,et al. What Makes Up A Procedure , 2002 .
[4] Kasia Muldner,et al. The Impact of Animated Pedagogical Agents on Girls' and Boys' Emotions, Attitudes, Behaviors and Learning , 2011, 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.
[5] Alexander Renkl,et al. Interactive Example-Based Learning Environments: Using Interactive Elements to Encourage Effective Processing of Worked Examples , 2007 .
[6] Scotty D. Craig,et al. The Deep-Level-Reasoning-Question Effect: The Role of Dialogue and Deep-Level-Reasoning Questions During Vicarious Learning , 2006 .
[7] Yanghee Kim,et al. Pedagogical Agents as Learning Companions: The Role of Agent Competency and Type of Interaction , 2006 .
[8] Bonnie E. John,et al. The Strategic Use of Complex Computer Systems , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..
[9] Joyce Karreman,et al. Adding Motivational Elements to an Instruction Manual for Seniors: Effects on Usability and Motivation , 2007 .
[10] P. Lachenbruch. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .
[11] J. Keller. Motivational Design for Learning and Performance: The ARCS Model Approach , 2009 .
[12] Wilmot Li,et al. Design principles for visual communication , 2011, Commun. ACM.
[13] J. Keller. Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design , 1987 .
[14] H. Tager-Flusberg. Brief report: Current theory and research on language and communication in autism , 1996, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.
[15] R. Mayer,et al. Engaging students in active learning: The case for personalized multimedia messages. , 2000 .
[16] J. Keller. Using the ARCS Motivational Process in Computer-Based Instruction and Distance Education , 1999 .
[17] Heather H. Mitchell,et al. AutoTutor: A tutor with dialogue in natural language , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[18] J. Sweller,et al. Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions , 2005 .
[19] John Keller,et al. Learner motivation and E-learning design: A multinationally validated process , 2004 .
[20] Jeffrey Holmes,et al. Designing agents to support learning by explaining , 2007, Comput. Educ..
[21] Susan Wiedenbeck,et al. End-user training: an empirical study comparing on-line practice methods , 1995, CHI '95.
[22] Hsiao-Lin Tuan,et al. Using ARCS Model to Promote 11th Graders' Motivation and Achievement in Learning about Acids and Bases , 2005 .
[23] Matthew W. Lewis,et al. Self-Explonations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems , 1989, Cogn. Sci..
[24] Alexander Renkl,et al. Learning from Worked-Out-Examples: A Study on Individual Differences , 1997, Cogn. Sci..
[25] J. Eccles,et al. Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.
[26] Amy B. Adcock,et al. Animated Agents Teaching Helping Skills in an Online Environment: A Pilot Study , 2007 .
[27] H. VAN DER MEIJ,et al. The four components of a procedure , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.
[28] Yanghee Kim,et al. Pedagogical Agent Design: The Impact of Agent Realism, Gender, Ethnicity, and Instructional Role , 2004, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.
[29] Richard E. Mayer,et al. A Personalization Effect in Multimedia Learning: Students Learn Better When Words Are in Conversational Style Rather Than Formal Style. , 2004 .
[30] James C. Lester,et al. The Case for Social Agency in Computer-Based Teaching: Do Students Learn More Deeply When They Interact With Animated Pedagogical Agents? , 2001 .
[31] S. Derry,et al. Learning from Examples: Instructional Principles from the Worked Examples Research , 2000 .
[32] Janet C. Read,et al. Validating the Fun Toolkit: an instrument for measuring children’s opinions of technology , 2008, Cognition, Technology & Work.
[33] R. Atkinson,et al. Transitioning From Studying Examples to Solving Problems: Effects of Self-Explanation Prompts and Fading Worked-Out Steps. , 2003 .
[34] Jason Huett,et al. Improving the Motivation and Retention of Online Students Through the Use of ARCS-Based E-Mails , 2008 .
[35] Susan Wiedenbeck,et al. An activity-based analysis of hands-on practice methods , 2008, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..
[36] Justine Cassell,et al. Virtual peers as partners in storytelling and literacy learning , 2003, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..
[37] Ning Wang,et al. Experimental evaluation of polite interaction tactics for pedagogical agents , 2005, IUI.
[38] Janet Palmer,et al. Affective guidance of intelligent agents: How emotion controls cognition , 2009, Cognitive Systems Research.
[39] Robert K. Atkinson,et al. Fostering multimedia learning of science: Exploring the role of an animated agent's image , 2007, Comput. Educ..
[40] Rinat B. Rosenberg-Kima,et al. Interface agents as social models for female students: The effects of agent visual presence and appearance on female students' attitudes and beliefs , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[41] Regina Vollmeyer,et al. Motivation and metacognition when learning a complex system , 1999 .
[42] Kate S. Hone,et al. Empathic agents to reduce user frustration: The effects of varying agent characteristics , 2006, Interact. Comput..
[43] Peter M. Hastings,et al. Research Methods Tutor: Evaluation of a dialogue-based tutoring system in the classroom , 2008, Behavior research methods.
[44] Wai-Tat Fu,et al. Resolving the paradox of the active user: stable suboptimal performance in interactive tasks , 2004, Cogn. Sci..
[45] A. Bandura. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.
[46] Ard W. Lazonder,et al. Error-information in tutorial documentation: Supporting users' errors to facilitate initial skill learning , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..
[47] G. Clarebout,et al. Do pedagogical agents make a difference to student motivation and learning , 2011 .
[48] Nicole Loorbach,et al. The Effects of Motivational Elements in User Instructions , 2006 .
[49] Stacy Marsella,et al. Interactive pedagogical drama , 2000, AGENTS '00.
[50] Regina Vollmeyer,et al. Motivational Effects on Self-Regulated Learning with Different Tasks , 2006 .
[51] Kasia Muldner,et al. The Effect of Motivational Learning Companions on Low Achieving Students and Students with Disabilities , 2010, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.
[52] J. Keller. Motivational Design for Learning and Performance , 2010 .
[53] Roxana Moreno,et al. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: Multimedia Learning with Animated Pedagogical Agents , 2005 .
[54] James C. Lester,et al. Modeling and evaluating empathy in embodied companion agents , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..
[55] Magnus Haake,et al. Design of animated pedagogical agents - A look at their look , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..
[56] F. Paas,et al. Measurement of Cognitive Load in Instructional Research , 1994, Perceptual and motor skills.
[57] Yanghee Kim,et al. Pedagogical agents as learning companions: the impact of agent emotion and gender , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..
[58] Peter Reimann,et al. The role of self-explanation in learning to use a spreadsheet through examples , 2000, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..
[59] Richard E. Mayer,et al. Multimedia learning in an interactive self-explaining environment: What works in the design of agent , 2003 .
[60] Robert K. Atkinson,et al. Animated pedagogical agents: does their degree of embodiment impact learning from static or animated worked examples? , 2007 .
[61] Detlev Leutner. Double-fading support - a training approach to complex software systems , 2000, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..
[62] John M. Carroll. Minimalism beyond the Nurnberg funnel , 1998 .
[63] Richard E. Mayer,et al. Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.
[64] Andrew Ortony,et al. The Referential Structure of the Affective Lexicon , 1987, Cogn. Sci..
[65] S. Schworm,et al. Learning argumentation skills through the use of prompts for self-explaining examples. , 2007 .
[66] R. Mayer,et al. Fostering social agency in multimedia learning: Examining the impact of an animated agent’s voice ☆ , 2005 .
[67] H. GLASBEEK,et al. Solving problems on your own: how do exercises in tutorials interact with software learners' level of goal-orientedness? , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.
[68] John Millar Carroll. The Nurnberg Funnel: Designing Minimalist Instruction for Practical Computer Skill , 1990 .
[69] Jonathan Klein,et al. This computer responds to user frustration: Theory, design, and results , 2002, Interact. Comput..
[70] John M. Carroll,et al. Principles and Heuristics for Designing Minimalist Instruction , 1998 .
[71] Erin Shaw,et al. Animated Pedagogical Agents: An Opportunity to be Grasped? , 2002 .
[72] Maria Bannert,et al. The effects of training wheels and self-learning materials in software training , 2008, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..
[73] R. Mayer,et al. Multimedia Learning: The Promise of Multimedia Learning , 2001 .
[74] Byron Reeves,et al. The effects of animated characters on anxiety, task performance, and evaluations of user interfaces , 2000, CHI.
[75] Susanne van Mulken,et al. The impact of animated interface agents: a review of empirical research , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..
[76] Ning Wang,et al. The politeness effect: Pedagogical agents and learning outcomes , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..
[77] Elisabeth André,et al. The Persona Effect: How Substantial Is It? , 1998, BCS HCI.
[78] Steffi Domagk,et al. Do Pedagogical Agents Facilitate Learner Motivation and Learning Outcomes? , 2010, J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl..
[79] Donald A. Norman,et al. How might people interact with agents , 1994, CACM.
[80] R. Mayer,et al. Personalized messages that promote science learning in virtual environments , 2004 .
[81] Isabel Machado,et al. Lifelong training with Vincent, a web-based pedagogical agent , 2002 .
[82] Mary Hegarty,et al. When static media promote active learning: annotated illustrations versus narrated animations in multimedia instruction. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.
[83] Hans van der Meij,et al. Designing for user cognition and affect in software instructions , 2008 .
[84] John M. Keller,et al. Effectiveness of motivationally adaptive computer-assisted instruction on the dynamic aspects of motivation , 2001 .
[85] Maria Virvou,et al. Evaluating the persona effect of an interface agent in a tutoring system , 2002, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..