Behavior of a Viscous LNAPL Under Variable Water Table Conditions

An intermediate-scale experiment in a 1.02-m-long, 0.75-m-high, and 0.05-m-wide flow cell was conducted to investigate the behavior of a viscous LNAPL under variable water table conditions. Two viscous LNAPL volumes (0.4 L) were released, one week apart, from a small source zone on top of the flow cell into a partly saturated, homogenously packed porous medium. Following a redistribution period of 30 days after the second release, the water table was increased 0.5 m in 50 minutes. After the water table rise, viscous LNAPL behavior was monitored for an additional 45 days. Fluid saturation scans were obtained periodically with a fully automated dual-energy gamma radiation system. Results show that both spills follow similar paths downwards. Within two hours after the first LNAPL arrival, the capillary fringe was reduced across the cell by approximately 0.04 m (22%). This reduction is directly related to the decrease in the air-water surface tension from 0.072 to 0.057 N/m. LNAPL drainage from the unsaturated zone was relatively slow and a considerable residual LNAPL saturation was observed after 30 days of drainage. Most of the mobile LNAPL moved into the capillary fringe during this period. After a rapid 0.5 m water table rise, the LNAPL moved up in a delayed fashion. The LNAPL used the same path upwards as it used coming down during the infiltration phase. After 45 days, the LNAPL had moved up only approximately 0.2 m. Since the LNAPL had only moved up a limited amount, nonwetting fluid entrapment was limited. The experiment was simulated using the STOMP multifluid flow simulator, which includes entrapped and residual LNAPL saturation formation. A comparison indicates that the simulator is able to predict the observed phenomena well, including residual saturation formation in the vadose zone, and limited upward LNAPL movement after the water table rise. The results of this experiment show that viscous mobile LNAPL, subject to variable water table conditions, does not necessarily float on the water table and may not appear in an observation well.

[1]  White,et al.  STOMP. Subsurface Transport Over Multiple Phases , 1997 .

[2]  C. Dirksen,et al.  Hydraulic Conductivity and Diffusivity: Laboratory Methods , 2018, SSSA Book Series.

[3]  Jack C. Parker,et al.  Experimental validation of the theory of extending two-phase saturation-pressure relations to three-fluid phase systems for monotonic drainage paths , 1988 .

[4]  R. H. Brooks,et al.  Hydraulic properties of porous media , 1963 .

[5]  Carbon Tetrachloride Flow Behavior in Unsaturated Hanford Caliche Material: An Investigation of Residual Nonaqueous Phase Liquids , 2003 .

[6]  Cass T. Miller,et al.  Remediation of DNAPL-Contaminated Subsurface Systems Using Density-Motivated Mobilization , 2000 .

[7]  M. Oostrom,et al.  Single-source gamma radiation procedures for improved calibration and measurements in porous media , 1998 .

[8]  Jack C. Parker,et al.  Multiphase flow with a simplified model for oil entrapment , 1992 .

[9]  Carlon S. Land,et al.  Calculation of Imbibition Relative Permeability for Two- and Three-Phase Flow From Rock Properties , 1968 .

[10]  Mark D. White,et al.  A Comparison of Models Describing Residual NAPL Formation in the Vadose Zone , 2005 .

[11]  G. Mattney Cole,et al.  Assessment and Remediation of Petroleum Contaminated Sites , 1994 .

[12]  Tammo S. Steenhuis,et al.  Measurement of fluid contents by light transmission in transient three‐phase oil‐water‐air systems in sand , 2001 .

[13]  J. McKenna,et al.  Time-lapse 3-D seismic imaging of shallow subsurface contaminant flow. , 2001, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[14]  David B. McWhorter,et al.  Volume Estimation of Light Nonaqueous Phase Liquids in Porous Media , 1990 .

[15]  J. H. Dane,et al.  Calibration and automation of a dual-energy gamma system for applications in soil science. , 1990 .

[16]  D. Durnford,et al.  LNAPL Thickness in Monitoring Wells Considering Hysteresis and Entrapment , 1996 .

[17]  C. S. Simmons,et al.  Investigation of density-dependent gas advection of trichloroethylene: experiment and a model validation exercise , 1995 .

[18]  M. White,et al.  A Practical Model for Mobile, Residual, and Entrapped NAPL in Water‐Wet Porous Media , 2004, Ground water.

[19]  J. C. Parker,et al.  Estimation of Free Hydrocarbon Volume from Fluid Levels in Monitoring Wells , 1990 .

[20]  Martinus Oostrom,et al.  STOMP Subsurface Transport Over Multiple Phases, Version 4.0, User’s Guide , 2006 .

[21]  Mark L. Brusseau,et al.  Rate‐limited mass transfer and transport of organic solutes in porous media that contain immobile immiscible organic liquid , 1992 .

[22]  Jonathan F. Sykes,et al.  Laboratory and model simulations of a LNAPL spill in a variably-saturated sand, 1. Laboratory experiment and image analysis techniques , 1994 .

[23]  J. H. Dane,et al.  Removal of Carbon Tetrachloride from a Layered Porous Medium by Means of Soil Vapor Extraction Enhanced by Desiccation and Water Table Reduction , 2005 .

[24]  M. Oostrom,et al.  Carbon Tetrachloride Flow Behavior in Unsaturated Hanford Caliche Material: An Investigation of Residual Nonaqueous Phase Liquids , 2003 .

[25]  J. H. Dane,et al.  A constitutive model for air-NAPL-water flow in the vadose zone accounting for immobile, non-occluded (residual) NAPL in strongly water-wet porous media. , 2004, Journal of contaminant hydrology.