Us without them: evidence for an intragroup origin of positive in-group regard.

Four experiments examined whether group formation and positive in-group regard require interaggregate comparison as the in-group-requires-an-out-group assumption of the metacontrast principle implies. The authors fostered novel social aggregates with or without a contrasting aggregate with which members could compare and varied intra-aggregate factors (interaction or interdependence). Regardless of whether interaggregate comparison was feasible, the intra-aggregate factors increased the perceived entitativity of the aggregate and positive regard toward the aggregate (i.e., social attraction and cooperation among members). Mediation analyses were consistent with the possibility that the intra-aggregate factors promoted entitativity, which in turn promoted in-group regard. These data suggest that group formation and in-group regard have intragroup origins and do not require comparison with a contrasting social aggregate.

[1]  Rick H. Hoyle,et al.  Individual-Group Discontinuity as a Function of Fear and Greed , 1990 .

[2]  C. Insko,et al.  Intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm: categorization, reciprocation, or fear? , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  Antony Stephen Reid Manstead,et al.  Integrating Identity and Instrumental Approaches to Intergroup Differentiation: Different Contexts, Different Motives , 2002 .

[4]  A. Lott,et al.  Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: a review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  C. Sedikides,et al.  Memory for in-group and out-group information in a minimal group context: the self as an informational base. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  H. Kelley,et al.  SIGNIFICANT FACTORS IN OVEREVALUATION OF OWN-GROUP'S PRODUCT. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[7]  C. McGarty,et al.  Determinants of perceived consistency: the relationship between group entitativity and the meaningfulness of categories. , 1995, The British journal of social psychology.

[8]  A. Aron,et al.  Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness , 1992 .

[9]  Richard L. Moreland,et al.  Back to the Future: Social Psychological Research on Groups , 1994 .

[10]  Morton Deutsch,et al.  The effects of cooperation and competition upon group process , 1948 .

[11]  M. Brewer,et al.  Scientific Inquiry and the Social Sciences: A Volume in Honor of Donald T. Campbell. , 1983 .

[12]  Lowell Gaertner,et al.  Perceived ingroup entitativity and intergroup bias: an interconnection of self and others , 1998 .

[13]  A. Zander,et al.  Group dynamics, research and theory , 1955 .

[14]  John M. Levine,et al.  Conflict in groups. , 1996 .

[15]  K. Lewin,et al.  Resolving social conflicts and field theory in social science. , 1997 .

[16]  Steven J. Sherman,et al.  Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. , 2000 .

[17]  John Orbell,et al.  Not me or thee but we: the importance of group identity in eliciting cooperation in dilemma situatio , 1988 .

[18]  M. Hogg,et al.  Social Attraction, Personal Attraction, and Self-Categorization-, A Field Study , 1991 .

[19]  D. Campbell Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities , 2007 .

[20]  A. Manstead,et al.  Bulletin Personality and Social Psychology Group Identification and Threat Two Functions of Verbal Intergroup Discrimination: Identity and Instrumental Motives as a Result of Two Functions of Verbal Intergroup Discrimination: Identity and Instrumental Motives as a Result of Group Identification and , 2022 .

[21]  Xiao-Li Meng,et al.  Comparing correlated correlation coefficients , 1992 .

[22]  Joseph P. Forgas,et al.  The Social Outcast : Ostracism, Social Exclusion, Rejection, and Bullying , 2005 .

[23]  Jacob M. Rabbie,et al.  Categories versus groups as explanatory concepts in intergroup relations , 1988 .

[24]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[25]  J. McGrath Groups: Interaction and Performance , 1984 .

[26]  H. Kelley,et al.  The social psychology of groups , 1960 .

[27]  D. Cremer,et al.  Social identification effects in social dilemmas : a transformation of motives , 1999 .

[28]  R. Gramzow,et al.  Self-esteem and favoritism toward novel in-groups: the self as an evaluative base. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. , 1986 .

[30]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[31]  Marilynn B. Brewer,et al.  Assimilation and differentiation needs as motivational determinants of perceived in-group and out-group homogeneity , 2001 .

[32]  G. Āllport The Nature of Prejudice , 1954 .

[33]  S. West,et al.  A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[34]  K. Lewin,et al.  Resolving Social Conflicts , 1948 .

[35]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Why do people rely on others? Social identity and social aspects of trust. , 2001 .

[36]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[37]  K. Cook Trust in Society , 2001 .

[38]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  Group Prototypically and Depersonalized Attraction in Small Interactive Groups , 1993 .

[39]  Linnda R. Caporael,et al.  Reviving Evolutionary Psychology: Biology Meets Society , 1991 .

[40]  M. Schaller,et al.  Prehistoric dangers and contemporary prejudices , 2003 .

[41]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  Motivation and Cognition in Social Life: A Social Survival Perspective , 1995 .

[42]  Dirk Wentura,et al.  Self-Anchoring and In-Group Favoritism: An Individual Profiles Analysis , 2001 .

[43]  Mahzarin R. Banaji,et al.  Group entitativity and group perception: associations between physical features and psychological judgment. , 1999 .

[44]  John C. Turner,et al.  Self and Collective: Cognition and Social Context , 1994 .

[45]  J. Krueger,et al.  Social categorization moderates social projection. , 2002 .

[46]  B. Lickel,et al.  Elements of a Lay Theory of Groups: Types of Groups, Relational Styles, and the Perception of Group Entitativity , 2001 .

[47]  M. Brewer In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. , 1979 .

[48]  R. Sorrentino,et al.  Uncertainty orientation and the social mind: Individual differences in the interpersonal context. , 2001 .

[49]  Joseph P. Forgas,et al.  The Social Mind: Cognitive and Motivational Aspects of Interpersonal Behavior , 2003 .

[50]  Marilynn B. Brewer,et al.  Seeing groups as entities: The role of perceiver motivation. , 1996 .

[51]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Social categorization and intergroup behaviour , 1971 .

[52]  Simona Sacchi,et al.  Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Castano Et Al. / Mortality Salience and Ingroup Entitativity I Belong Therefore I Exist: Ingroup Identification, Ingroup Entitativity, and Ingroup Bias , 2022 .

[53]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  Social identity and the sovereignty of the group: A psychology of belonging , 2000 .

[54]  E. S. Knowles,et al.  Groups and crowds as social entities: Effects of activity, size, and member similarity on nonmembers. , 1976 .

[55]  S. Worchel,et al.  The Social psychology of intergroup relations , 1979 .

[56]  M. Cadinu,et al.  Self-anchoring and differentiation processes in the minimal group setting. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[57]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviour , 1973 .

[58]  L. Gaertner,et al.  Rejection and Entitativity: A Synergistic Model of Mass Violence. , 2005 .

[59]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  Intergroup relations and group solidarity : Effects of group identification and social beliefs on depersonalized attraction , 1996 .

[60]  E. Higgins,et al.  Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. , 1996 .

[61]  M. Brewer,et al.  Ingroup bias as a function of task characteristics , 1978 .

[62]  Lowell Gaertner,et al.  On the measurement of social orientations in the minimal group paradigm: norms as moderators of the expression of intergroup bias , 2001 .

[63]  Elizabeth F Loftus,et al.  Leading questions and the eyewitness report , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[64]  E. Higgins,et al.  The interpersonal context , 1996 .