Risk Factors for Pancreatic Fistula after Stapled Gland Transection

The objective of this study was to identify risk factors for pancreatic fistula (PF) after stapled transection in distal pancreatectomy (DP). Patients undergoing DP using a stapler for transection between 2005 and 2009 were identified from a pancreatic resection database. Variables examined included patient and tumor characteristics, staple size, and the use of mesh reinforcement. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for postoperative PF. One hundred forty-nine had stapled transection, and of these, 25 (17%) had mesh reinforcement. The overall morbidity and mortality rates were 28 per cent and less than 1 per cent; 34 (23%) were diabetic. The rate of clinically significant PF was 14 per cent. On univariate analysis, diabetes (P = 0.04), a firm pancreas (P = 0.03), use of mesh staple line reinforcement (P = 0.02), use of a 4.1-mm staple cartridge (P = 0.01), and blood loss greater than 100 mL (P = 0.01) were associated with higher pancreatic fistula rates. On multivariate analysis, only the presence of diabetes (OR, 4.17; 95% CI, 1.1-15.3; P = 0.03) and the use of a 4.1-mm cartridge (OR, 8.57; 95% CI, 1.2-60.2; P = 0.03) were independently associated with pancreatic fistula formation. Stapled pancreatic transection provides an acceptable PF rate after DP. Diabetes and staple size influence PF rates. In our experience, use of mesh staple line reinforcement did not reduce the incidence of PF after stapled transection.

[1]  G. Umpierrez,et al.  Impact of diabetes mellitus on perioperative outcomes after resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[2]  N. Nguyen,et al.  Use of Seamguard to prevent pancreatic leak following distal pancreatectomy. , 2009, Archives of surgery.

[3]  B. Paz,et al.  Increased Incidence of Pancreatic Fistulas after the Introduction of a Bioabsorbable Staple Line Reinforcement in Distal Pancreatic Resections , 2009, The American surgeon.

[4]  K. Trinkaus,et al.  The effect of mesh reinforcement of a stapled transection line on the rate of pancreatic occlusion failure after distal pancreatectomy: review of a single institution's experience. , 2009, HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association.

[5]  K. Soo,et al.  Critical appraisal of 232 consecutive distal pancreatectomies with emphasis on risk factors, outcome, and management of the postoperative pancreatic fistula: a 21-year experience at a single institution. , 2008, Archives of surgery.

[6]  A. Parikh,et al.  Left-sided Pancreatectomy: A Multicenter Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Approaches , 2008, Annals of surgery.

[7]  D. Rattner,et al.  Pancreatic Fistula Rates After 462 Distal Pancreatectomies: Staplers Do Not Decrease Fistula Rates , 2008, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[8]  S. Maithel,et al.  Clinical and Economic Validation of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) Classification Scheme , 2007, Annals of surgery.

[9]  B. Matthews,et al.  Absorbable Mesh Reinforcement of a Stapled Pancreatic Transection Line Reduces the Leak Rate with Distal Pancreatectomy , 2007, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[10]  M. Büchler,et al.  Systematic review and meta‐analysis of technique for closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy , 2005, The British journal of surgery.

[11]  N. Demartines,et al.  Classification of Surgical Complications: A New Proposal With Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a Survey , 2004, Annals of Surgery.

[12]  K. Lillemoe,et al.  Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients. , 1999, Annals of surgery.

[13]  C. Mackenzie,et al.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.