Heart valve isogeometric sequentially-coupled FSI analysis with the space–time topology change method

Heart valve fluid–structure interaction (FSI) analysis is one of the computationally challenging cases in cardiovascular fluid mechanics. The challenges include unsteady flow through a complex geometry, solid surfaces with large motion, and contact between the valve leaflets. We introduce here an isogeometric sequentially-coupled FSI (SCFSI) method that can address the challenges with an outcome of high-fidelity flow solutions. The SCFSI analysis enables dealing with the fluid and structure parts individually at different steps of the solutions sequence, and also enables using different methods or different mesh resolution levels at different steps. In the isogeometric SCFSI analysis here, the first step is a previously computed (fully) coupled Immersogeometric Analysis FSI of the heart valve with a reasonable flow solution. With the valve leaflet and arterial surface motion coming from that, we perform a new, higher-fidelity fluid mechanics computation with the space–time topology change method and isogeometric discretization. Both the immersogeometric and space–time methods are variational multiscale methods. The computation presented for a bioprosthetic heart valve demonstrates the power of the method introduced.

[1]  Alessandro Corsini,et al.  Computational analysis of wind-turbine blade rain erosion , 2016 .

[2]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  CHALLENGES AND DIRECTIONS IN COMPUTATIONAL FLUID–STRUCTURE INTERACTION , 2013 .

[3]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  NURBS-based isogeometric analysis for the computation of flows about rotating components , 2008 .

[4]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Space–time finite element computation of complex fluid–structure interactions , 2010 .

[5]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Element length calculation in B-spline meshes for complex geometries , 2020, Computational Mechanics.

[6]  Xiaowei Deng,et al.  Fluid–Structure Interaction Modeling of Vertical-Axis Wind Turbines , 2014 .

[7]  I. Akkerman,et al.  Large eddy simulation of turbulent Taylor-Couette flow using isogeometric analysis and the residual-based variational multiscale method , 2010, J. Comput. Phys..

[8]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  New Directions in Space–Time Computational Methods , 2016 .

[9]  Xiao Yun Xu,et al.  Coronary arterial dynamics computation with medical-image-based time-dependent anatomical models and element-based zero-stress state estimates , 2014 .

[10]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Space–time VMS flow analysis of a turbocharger turbine with isogeometric discretization: computations with time-dependent and steady-inflow representations of the intake/exhaust cycle , 2019, Computational Mechanics.

[11]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Space–Time method for flow computations with slip interfaces and topology changes (ST-SI-TC) , 2016 .

[12]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  High-performance computing of wind turbine aerodynamics using isogeometric analysis , 2011 .

[13]  T. Hughes,et al.  Isogeometric fluid-structure interaction: theory, algorithms, and computations , 2008 .

[14]  A. Korobenko,et al.  Recent Advances in ALE-VMS and ST-VMS Computational Aerodynamic and FSI Analysis of Wind Turbines , 2018 .

[15]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  New directions and challenging computations in fluid dynamics modeling with stabilized and multiscale methods , 2015 .

[16]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  Fluid–structure interaction simulation of pulsatile ventricular assist devices , 2013, Computational Mechanics.

[17]  Xiaowei Deng,et al.  Free-surface flow modeling and simulation of horizontal-axis tidal-stream turbines , 2017 .

[18]  Alessandro Corsini,et al.  A DRD finite element formulation for computing turbulent reacting flows in gas turbine combustors , 2010 .

[19]  T. Tezduyar,et al.  Space–time computation techniques with continuous representation in time (ST-C) , 2014 .

[20]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  Toward free-surface modeling of planing vessels: simulation of the Fridsma hull using ALE-VMS , 2012 .

[21]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Fluid–structure interaction analysis of bioprosthetic heart valves: significance of arterial wall deformation , 2014, Computational Mechanics.

[22]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  Finite element simulation of wind turbine aerodynamics: validation study using NREL Phase VI experiment , 2014 .

[23]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  Using ALE-VMS to compute aerodynamic derivatives of bridge sections , 2019, Computers & Fluids.

[24]  Marek Behr,et al.  Parallel finite-element computation of 3D flows , 1993, Computer.

[25]  Yuki Ueda,et al.  A node-numbering-invariant directional length scale for simplex elements , 2019, Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences.

[26]  T. Hughes,et al.  Error estimates for projection-based dynamic augmented Lagrangian boundary condition enforcement, with application to fluid–structure interaction , 2018, Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences.

[27]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  An immersogeometric variational framework for fluid-structure interaction: application to bioprosthetic heart valves. , 2015, Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering.

[28]  T. Hughes,et al.  Streamline upwind/Petrov-Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations , 1990 .

[29]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Computational Methods for Parachute Fluid–Structure Interactions , 2012 .

[30]  Ming-Chen Hsu,et al.  Computational vascular fluid–structure interaction: methodology and application to cerebral aneurysms , 2010, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[31]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Heart Valve Flow Computation with the Space–Time Slip Interface Topology Change (ST-SI-TC) Method and Isogeometric Analysis (IGA) , 2018 .

[32]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Anatomically realistic lumen motion representation in patient-specific space–time isogeometric flow analysis of coronary arteries with time-dependent medical-image data , 2020, Computational Mechanics.

[33]  A. L. Marsden,et al.  Computation of residence time in the simulation of pulsatile ventricular assist devices , 2014 .

[34]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Mesh refinement influence and cardiac-cycle flow periodicity in aorta flow analysis with isogeometric discretization , 2019, Computers & Fluids.

[35]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Space–time fluid mechanics computation of heart valve models , 2014 .

[36]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  Modeling of a hydraulic arresting gear using fluid-structure interaction and isogeometric analysis , 2017 .

[37]  T. Tezduyar,et al.  Particle tracking and particle–shock interaction in compressible-flow computations with the V-SGS stabilization and $$YZ\beta $$YZβ shock-capturing , 2015 .

[38]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Turbocharger turbine and exhaust manifold flow computation with the Space–Time Variational Multiscale Method and Isogeometric Analysis , 2019, Computers & Fluids.

[39]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  Computational and experimental investigation of free vibration and flutter of bridge decks , 2018, Computational Mechanics.

[40]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Heart valve flow computation with the integrated Space–Time VMS, Slip Interface, Topology Change and Isogeometric Discretization methods , 2017 .

[41]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  Shape optimization of pulsatile ventricular assist devices using FSI to minimize thrombotic risk , 2014 .

[42]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  Space–Time and ALE-VMS Techniques for Patient-Specific Cardiovascular Fluid–Structure Interaction Modeling , 2012 .

[43]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Space–time computations in practical engineering applications: a summary of the 25-year history , 2018, Computational Mechanics.

[44]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  Isogeometric divergence-conforming variational multiscale formulation of incompressible turbulent flows , 2017 .

[45]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Compressible-flow geometric-porosity modeling and spacecraft parachute computation with isogeometric discretization , 2018, Computational Mechanics.

[46]  Alessandro Corsini,et al.  A variational multiscale method for particle-cloud tracking in turbomachinery flows , 2014 .

[47]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  Computational fluid–structure interaction: methods and application to a total cavopulmonary connection , 2009 .

[48]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Medical-image-based aorta modeling with zero-stress-state estimation , 2019, Computational Mechanics.

[49]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Space–time computational analysis of tire aerodynamics with actual geometry, road contact, tire deformation, road roughness and fluid film , 2019, Computational Mechanics.

[50]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  SPACE–TIME VMS METHODS FOR MODELING OF INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOWS AT HIGH REYNOLDS NUMBERS , 2013 .

[51]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  Aerodynamic and FSI Analysis of Wind Turbines with the ALE-VMS and ST-VMS Methods , 2014 .

[52]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  FSI modeling of the reefed stages and disreefing of the Orion spacecraft parachutes , 2014 .

[53]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  3D simulation of wind turbine rotors at full scale. Part I: Geometry modeling and aerodynamics , 2011 .

[54]  Kenji Takizawa,et al.  FSI analysis of the blood flow and geometrical characteristics in the thoracic aorta , 2014 .

[55]  Anindya Ghoshal,et al.  Compressible flows on moving domains: Stabilized methods, weakly enforced essential boundary conditions, sliding interfaces, and application to gas-turbine modeling , 2017 .

[56]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  A fully-coupled fluid-structure interaction simulation of cerebral aneurysms , 2010 .

[57]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  METHODS FOR FSI MODELING OF SPACECRAFT PARACHUTE DYNAMICS AND COVER SEPARATION , 2013 .

[58]  Hitoshi Hattori,et al.  Space–time VMS method for flow computations with slip interfaces (ST-SI) , 2015 .

[59]  Kenji Takizawa,et al.  Computational engineering analysis with the new-generation space–time methods , 2014 .

[60]  A. Korobenko,et al.  FSI Simulation of two back-to-back wind turbines in atmospheric boundary layer flow , 2017 .

[61]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  ALE-VMS AND ST-VMS METHODS FOR COMPUTER MODELING OF WIND-TURBINE ROTOR AERODYNAMICS AND FLUID–STRUCTURE INTERACTION , 2012 .

[62]  Hitoshi Hattori,et al.  Computational analysis of flow-driven string dynamics in turbomachinery , 2017 .

[63]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  Fluid–structure interaction modeling of wind turbines: simulating the full machine , 2012, Computational Mechanics.

[64]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  SPACE–TIME FLUID–STRUCTURE INTERACTION METHODS , 2012 .

[65]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Multiscale space-time methods for thermo-fluid analysis of a ground vehicle and its tires , 2015 .

[66]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  3D simulation of wind turbine rotors at full scale. Part II: Fluid–structure interaction modeling with composite blades , 2011 .

[67]  T. Hughes,et al.  Isogeometric analysis : CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement , 2005 .

[68]  T. Hughes,et al.  Isogeometric Fluid–structure Interaction Analysis with Applications to Arterial Blood Flow , 2006 .

[69]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  Dynamic and fluid–structure interaction simulations of bioprosthetic heart valves using parametric design with T-splines and Fung-type material models , 2015, Computational mechanics.

[70]  Alessandro Corsini,et al.  Computer Modeling of Wave-Energy Air Turbines With the SUPG/PSPG Formulation and Discontinuity-Capturing Technique , 2012 .

[71]  T. Tezduyar,et al.  Mesh Moving Techniques for Fluid-Structure Interactions With Large Displacements , 2003 .

[72]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Special methods for aerodynamic-moment calculations from parachute FSI modeling , 2015 .

[73]  Alessandro Corsini,et al.  Computational analysis of noise reduction devices in axial fans with stabilized finite element formulations , 2012 .

[74]  Victor M. Calo,et al.  Improving stability of stabilized and multiscale formulations in flow simulations at small time steps , 2010 .

[75]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Aorta flow analysis and heart valve flow and structure analysis , 2018 .

[76]  T. Tezduyar,et al.  A parallel 3D computational method for fluid-structure interactions in parachute systems , 2000 .

[77]  T. Tezduyar,et al.  Flow analysis of a wave-energy air turbine with the SUPG/PSPG stabilization and Discontinuity-Capturing Directional Dissipation , 2016 .

[78]  A. Korobenko,et al.  FSI modeling of a propulsion system based on compliant hydrofoils in a tandem configuration , 2016 .

[79]  Marco S. Pigazzini,et al.  Optimizing fluid–structure interaction systems with immersogeometric analysis and surrogate modeling: Application to a hydraulic arresting gear , 2017 .

[80]  A. Korobenko,et al.  ALE–VMS formulation for stratified turbulent incompressible flows with applications , 2015 .

[81]  Alessandro Corsini,et al.  Stabilized finite element computation of NOx emission in aero‐engine combustors , 2011 .

[82]  Hitoshi Hattori,et al.  Turbocharger flow computations with the Space-Time Isogeometric Analysis (ST-IGA) , 2017 .

[83]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  Isogeometric fluid–structure interaction analysis with emphasis on non-matching discretizations, and with application to wind turbines , 2012 .

[84]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Finite element methods for flow problems with moving boundaries and interfaces , 2001 .

[85]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  FSI modeling of the Orion spacecraft drogue parachutes , 2015 .

[86]  A. Korobenko,et al.  Aerodynamic Simulation of Vertical-Axis Wind Turbines , 2014 .

[87]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Space-Time Computational Techniques for the Aerodynamics of Flapping Wings , 2012 .

[88]  Kenji Takizawa,et al.  Space–time interface-tracking with topology change (ST-TC) , 2014 .

[89]  A. Korobenko,et al.  Computational free-surface fluid–structure interaction with application to floating offshore wind turbines , 2016 .

[90]  Tayfan E. Tezduyar,et al.  Stabilized Finite Element Formulations for Incompressible Flow Computations , 1991 .

[91]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  Isogeometric Modeling and Experimental Investigation of Moving-Domain Bridge Aerodynamics , 2019, Journal of Engineering Mechanics.

[92]  Kenji Takizawa,et al.  ST and ALE-VMS methods for patient-specific cardiovascular fluid mechanics modeling , 2014 .

[93]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Patient-specific isogeometric fluid–structure interaction analysis of thoracic aortic blood flow due to implantation of the Jarvik 2000 left ventricular assist device , 2009 .

[94]  Kenji Takizawa,et al.  Patient-specific computer modeling of blood flow in cerebral arteries with aneurysm and stent , 2012, Computational Mechanics.

[95]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  Free-Surface Flow and Fluid-Object Interaction Modeling With Emphasis on Ship Hydrodynamics , 2012 .

[96]  S. Mittal,et al.  Computation of unsteady incompressible flows with the stabilized finite element methods: Space-time formulations, iterative strategies and massively parallel implementations , 1992 .

[97]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Ram-air parachute structural and fluid mechanics computations with the Space-Time Isogeometric Analysis (ST-IGA) , 2016 .

[98]  Alessandro Corsini,et al.  A Multiscale Finite Element Formulation With Discontinuity Capturing for Turbulence Models With Dominant Reactionlike Terms , 2009 .

[99]  Kenji Takizawa,et al.  Computational thermo-fluid analysis of a disk brake , 2016 .

[100]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Massively parallel finite element simulation Of compressible and incompressible flows , 1994 .

[101]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  Computational Fluid-Structure Interaction: Methods and Applications , 2013 .

[102]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Estimation of element-based zero-stress state for arterial FSI computations , 2014 .

[103]  Kenji Takizawa,et al.  Space–time computational analysis of MAV flapping-wing aerodynamics with wing clapping , 2015 .

[104]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Multiscale sequentially-coupled arterial FSI technique , 2010 .

[105]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Patient-specific computational analysis of the influence of a stent on the unsteady flow in cerebral aneurysms , 2013 .

[106]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Aorta zero-stress state modeling with T-spline discretization , 2018, Computational Mechanics.

[107]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  Blood vessel tissue prestress modeling for vascular fluid-structure interaction simulation , 2011 .

[108]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Space–time techniques for computational aerodynamics modeling of flapping wings of an actual locust , 2012 .

[109]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  A Geometrical-Characteristics Study in Patient-Specific FSI Analysis of Blood Flow in the Thoracic Aorta , 2016 .

[110]  A. Korobenko,et al.  STRUCTURAL MECHANICS MODELING AND FSI SIMULATION OF WIND TURBINES , 2013 .

[111]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  Experimental and numerical FSI study of compliant hydrofoils , 2015 .

[112]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Computational analysis of flow-driven string dynamics in a pump and residence time calculation , 2019 .

[113]  T. Hughes.  Multiscale phenomena: Green's functions, the Dirichlet-to-Neumann formulation, subgrid scale models, bubbles and the origins of stabilized methods , 1995 .

[114]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Space–time VMS computational flow analysis with isogeometric discretization and a general-purpose NURBS mesh generation method , 2017 .

[115]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  Computational Cardiovascular Flow Analysis with the Variational Multiscale Methods , 2019, J. Adv. Eng. Comput..

[116]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  A General-Purpose NURBS Mesh Generation Method for Complex Geometries , 2018 .

[117]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  Computational analysis methods for complex unsteady flow problems , 2019, Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences.

[118]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Space–Time Computational Analysis of Tire Aerodynamics with Actual Geometry, Road Contact, and Tire Deformation , 2018 .

[119]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  Projection-based stabilization of interface Lagrange multipliers in immersogeometric fluid-thin structure interaction analysis, with application to heart valve modeling , 2017, Comput. Math. Appl..

[120]  T. Tezduyar,et al.  Arterial fluid mechanics modeling with the stabilized space–time fluid–structure interaction technique , 2008 .

[121]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  Engineering Analysis and Design with ALE-VMS and Space–Time Methods , 2014 .

[122]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Multiscale methods for gore curvature calculations from FSI modeling of spacecraft parachutes , 2014 .

[123]  A. Korobenko,et al.  A new variational multiscale formulation for stratified incompressible turbulent flows , 2017 .

[124]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Tire aerodynamics with actual tire geometry, road contact and tire deformation , 2018, Computational Mechanics.

[125]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  Wind turbine aerodynamics using ALE–VMS: validation and the role of weakly enforced boundary conditions , 2012 .

[126]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Aorta modeling with the element-based zero-stress state and isogeometric discretization , 2017 .

[127]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  Lagrangian-Eulerian finite element formulation for incompressible viscous flows☆ , 1981 .

[128]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Space–time computational analysis of bio-inspired flapping-wing aerodynamics of a micro aerial vehicle , 2012 .

[129]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Computation of Inviscid Supersonic Flows Around Cylinders and Spheres With the V-SGS Stabilization and YZβ Shock-Capturing , 2009 .

[130]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Interface projection techniques for fluid–structure interaction modeling with moving-mesh methods , 2008 .

[131]  Pablo A. Kler,et al.  SUPG and discontinuity-capturing methods for coupled fluid mechanics and electrochemical transport problems , 2013 .

[132]  T. Tezduyar,et al.  Stabilized space–time computation of wind-turbine rotor aerodynamics , 2011 .

[133]  T. Tezduyar.  Computation of moving boundaries and interfaces and stabilization parameters , 2003 .

[134]  A. Korobenko,et al.  Computer Modeling of Wind Turbines: 1. ALE-VMS and ST-VMS Aerodynamic and FSI Analysis , 2018, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering.

[135]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Fluid–structure interaction modeling of ringsail parachutes with disreefing and modified geometric porosity , 2012 .

[136]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Mesh update strategies in parallel finite element computations of flow problems with moving boundaries and interfaces , 1994 .

[137]  Kenji Takizawa,et al.  Computer modeling techniques for flapping-wing aerodynamics of a locust , 2013 .

[138]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Estimation of Element-Based Zero-Stress State in Arterial FSI Computations with Isogeometric Wall Discretization , 2018 .

[139]  T. Tezduyar,et al.  Computational analysis of performance deterioration of a wind turbine blade strip subjected to environmental erosion , 2019, Computational Mechanics.

[140]  A. Korobenko,et al.  Novel structural modeling and mesh moving techniques for advanced fluid–structure interaction simulation of wind turbines , 2015 .

[141]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Porosity models and computational methods for compressible-flow aerodynamics of parachutes with geometric porosity , 2017 .

[142]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Modelling of fluid–structure interactions with the space–time finite elements: Solution techniques , 2007 .

[143]  T. Hughes,et al.  Variational multiscale residual-based turbulence modeling for large eddy simulation of incompressible flows , 2007 .

[144]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Multiscale space–time fluid–structure interaction techniques , 2011 .

[145]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  A stabilized ALE method for computational fluid-structure interaction analysis of passive morphing in turbomachinery , 2019 .

[146]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Sequentially-coupled space–time FSI analysis of bio-inspired flapping-wing aerodynamics of an MAV , 2014 .

[147]  Marek Behr,et al.  Enhanced-Discretization Interface-Capturing Technique (EDICT) for computation of unsteady flows with interfaces , 1998 .

[148]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  Numerical-performance studies for the stabilized space–time computation of wind-turbine rotor aerodynamics , 2011 .

[149]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Space–time VMS computation of wind-turbine rotor and tower aerodynamics , 2014 .

[150]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Stabilization and discontinuity-capturing parameters for space–time flow computations with finite element and isogeometric discretizations , 2018 .

[151]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Sequentially-Coupled Arterial Fluid-Structure Interaction (SCAFSI) technique , 2009 .

[152]  T. Hughes,et al.  Isogeometric variational multiscale modeling of wall-bounded turbulent flows with weakly enforced boundary conditions on unstretched meshes , 2010 .

[153]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Isogeometric hyperelastic shell analysis with out-of-plane deformation mapping , 2018, Computational Mechanics.

[154]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Methods for computation of flow-driven string dynamics in a pump and residence time , 2019, Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences.

[155]  A. Korobenko,et al.  Fluid–Structure Interaction Modeling for Fatigue-Damage Prediction in Full-Scale Wind-Turbine Blades , 2016 .

[156]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Large eddy simulation of turbulent channel flows by the variational multiscale method , 2001 .

[157]  Kenji Takizawa,et al.  Fluid–structure interaction modeling of clusters of spacecraft parachutes with modified geometric porosity , 2013 .

[158]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Space–time Isogeometric flow analysis with built-in Reynolds-equation limit , 2019, Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences.

[159]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Weak imposition of Dirichlet boundary conditions in fluid mechanics , 2007 .