Detection uncertainty and the facilitation of chromatic detection by luminance contours.

A suprathreshold luminance flash (1 degree, 200 msec) on a large uniform yellow field facilitates detection of a coincident (1 degree, 200 msec) red or green equiluminant flash and approximately linearizes the psychometric function for detecting the chromatic flash. The facilitation is produced by the suprathreshold contour created by the luminance flash. We tested whether the contour facilitates detection by reducing spatiotemporal uncertainty in detecting the chromatic flash. Uncertainty increase false alarms, and this effect can be factored out by correcting yes-no psychometric functions for guessing. Uncertainty also alters the shape of the receiver operating characteristic. Measurements of yes-no psychometric functions and receiver operating characteristics do not support the uncertainty reduction hypothesis.

[1]  R. Eskew.  The gap effect revisited: Slow changes in chromatic sensitivity as affected by luminance and chromatic borders , 1989, Vision Research.

[2]  Mary Hayhoe,et al.  The gap effect: Chromatic and achromatic visual discrimination as affected by field separation , 1977 .

[3]  C. Stromeyer,et al.  Visual interactions with luminance and chromatic stimuli. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[4]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  On the relation between summation and facilitation , 1987, Vision Research.

[5]  J. Pokorny,et al.  Spectral sensitivity of the foveal cone photopigments between 400 and 500 nm , 1975, Vision Research.

[6]  C. Stromeyer,et al.  Chromatic suppression of cone inputs to the luminance flicker mechanism , 1987, Vision Research.

[7]  David Jaarsma,et al.  More on the Detection of One of M Orthogonal Signals , 1967 .

[8]  S. Schein,et al.  Mapping of retinal and geniculate neurons onto striate cortex of macaque , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  D. W. Heeley,et al.  Cardinal directions of color space , 1982, Vision Research.

[10]  W. P. Tanner.  PHYSIOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS OF PSYCHOPHYSICAL DATA * , 1961, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[11]  N Graham,et al.  Simultaneous measurement of spatial-frequency summation and uncertainty effects. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[12]  J Nachmias,et al.  Letter: Grating contrast: discrimination may be better than detection. , 1974, Vision research.

[13]  Jacob Nachmias,et al.  Signal Detection Theory and its Application to Problems in Vision , 1972 .

[14]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of form perception: boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color spreading. , 1985, Psychological review.

[15]  C. F. Stromeyer,et al.  Second-site adaptation in the red-green chromatic pathways , 1985, Vision Research.

[16]  S. Klein,et al.  Spatial frequency channels in human vision as asymmetric (edge) mechanisms. , 1974, Vision research.

[17]  A Bradley,et al.  Contrast dependence and mechanisms of masking interactions among chromatic and luminance gratings. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[18]  J. Nachmias,et al.  Visual detection and discrimination of luminance increments. , 1970, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[19]  S. Klein,et al.  Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification , 1985, Vision Research.

[20]  D G Pelli,et al.  Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[21]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Contrast detection and near-threshold discrimination in human vision , 1981, Vision Research.