Epidemiology and Co-Reactivity of Novel Surfactant Allergens: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Study

BackgroundSurfactants are cleansing agents used in products such as shampoos and soaps. ObjectivesThe aims of this study were to identify positivity rates to 3 novel amide-containing surfactants (sodium lauroyl sarcosinate, isostearamidopropyl morpholine lactate, and disodium lauroamphodiacetate) and evaluate co-reactivity with other surfactants in patients with known surfactant sensitivity. MethodsPreviously patch-tested, surfactant-positive patients were identified via chart review and invited to participate. Participants were patch tested to screening surfactants (cocamidopropyl betaine, amidoamine, dimethylaminopropylamine, cocamide diethanolamine [DEA], oleamidopropyl dimethylamine, and decyl glucoside), as well as 3 novel surfactants: sodium lauroyl sarcosinate 0.5% and 1.0% aq, isostearamidopropyl morpholine lactate 0.5% and 1.0% aq, disodium lauroamphodiacetate 1.0 and 2.0% aq, and a hypoallergenic liquid cleanser (tested semiopen). Participants and clinicians were blinded. The order of tested allergens was randomized. ResultsForty-seven participants completed the study. Excluding doubtful reactions, positive reactions were most common to oleamidopropyl dimethylamine (34%) and dimethylaminopropylamine (34%), followed by isostearamidopropyl morpholine lactate (23%). Reactivity was not associated with history of childhood eczema. Co-reactivity was high among oleamidopropyl dimethylamine, dimethylaminopropylamine, cocamidopropyl betaine, amidoamine, and isostearamidopropyl morpholine lactate. None of the participants who reacted to cocamide DEA reacted to an additional surfactant. ConclusionsIsostearamidopropyl morpholine lactate may be an important emerging allergen with sensitivity rates comparable with those of oleamidopropyl dimethylamine and dimethylaminopropylamine. Co-reactivity among surfactants was frequent except for cocamide DEA.

[1]  E. Warshaw,et al.  Contact Allergy to Surfactants in a Hypoallergenic Liquid Cleanser , 2015, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[2]  E. Warshaw,et al.  Cutaneous Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity to Surfactants , 2015, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[3]  E. Warshaw,et al.  North American Contact Dermatitis Group Patch Test Results: 2011–2012 , 2015, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[4]  D. Belsito,et al.  Cutaneous delayed-type hypersensitivity in patients with atopic dermatitis: reactivity to surfactants. , 2014, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[5]  A. Goossens,et al.  Allergic contact dermatitis caused by alkyl glucosides , 2014, Contact dermatitis.

[6]  D. Belsito,et al.  Cutaneous delayed-type hypersensitivity in patients with atopic dermatitis: reactivity to topical preservatives. , 2014, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[7]  D. Belsito,et al.  Cutaneous delayed-type hypersensitivity in patients with atopic dermatitis. , 2013, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[8]  R. Nixon Patch Testing: Test Concentration and Vehicles for 4350 Chemicals , 2010 .

[9]  D. Sasseville,et al.  Emergent and Unusual Allergens in Cosmetics , 2010, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[10]  E. Warshaw,et al.  Allergenicity and Cross‐Reactivity of Coconut Oil Derivatives: A Double‐Blind Randomized Controlled Pilot Study , 2006, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[11]  A. Goossens,et al.  Decyl glucoside contact allergy from a sunscreen product , 2006, Contact dermatitis.

[12]  J. Fowler,et al.  Relevance of positive patch-test reactions to cocamidopropyl betaine and amidoamine. , 2004, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[13]  D. Moore,et al.  Cleansing without compromise: the impact of cleansers on the skin barrier and the technology of mild cleansing , 2004, Dermatologic therapy.

[14]  A. Blondeel,et al.  Contact allergy to the mild surfactant decylglucoside , 2003, Contact dermatitis.

[15]  C. Le Coz,et al.  Contact allergy to decyl glucoside in antiseptic after body piercing , 2003, Contact dermatitis.

[16]  G. Angelini,et al.  The role of 3‐dimethylaminopropylamine and amidoamine in contact allergy to cocamidopropylbetaine , 2003, Contact dermatitis.

[17]  A. Goossens,et al.  Glucosides as unexpected allergens in cosmetics , 2003, Contact dermatitis.

[18]  R. González-Amaro,et al.  Correlation between pH and irritant effect of cleansers marketed for dry skin , 2002, International journal of dermatology.

[19]  D. Basketter,et al.  Clinical allergy to cocamidopropyl betaine: reactivity to cocamidopropylamine and lack of reactivity to 3‐dimethylaminopropylamine , 2001, Contact dermatitis.

[20]  F. A. Andersen Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Isostearamidopropyl Morpholine Lactate , 1999 .

[21]  Hunter Je,et al.  Allergy to cocamidopropyl betaine may be due to amidoamine : a patch test and product use test study , 1997 .

[22]  J. Fowler,et al.  Allergy to cocamidopropyl betaine may be due to amidoamine: a patch test and product use test study , 1997, Contact dermatitis.