Conceptual Modelling in Error Analysis in Computer-Assisted Language Learning Systems

Many computer-assisted language learning systems specifically designed to be used in the curriculum and which exploit AI techniques have neither a learner model nor consequently any deep error analysis. Evidence from applied linguistics shows that learners have their own system of rules for the production of a foreign language. We believe the central issue is to determine the appropriate level of description of these rules and uncover the strategies used by the learners in particular situations. This information represents the major part of the learner model. We review error analysis in second language learning and tutoring systems related to this perspective. We introduce a new structure, called an “applicable rule”, that can be used to help diagnose and to represent a learner’s performance. We propose a design for the architecture of a system for computer diagnoses of learners’ grammatical performances in a communicative environment. Examples of diagnosis using applicable rules illustrate the functioning of this architecture.

[1]  George W. Mulford.  Semantic processing for communicative exercises in foreign-language learning , 1989 .

[2]  Anne Abeillé,et al.  A Lexicalized Tree Adjoining Grammar for French and its Relevance to Language Teaching , 1992 .

[3]  Christophe Fouqueré.  Systèmes d'analyse tolérante du langage naturel , 1988 .

[4]  Mikhail V. Matz.  A process model for high school algebra errors , 1982 .

[5]  Merryanna L. Swartz,et al.  Issues for Tutoring Knowledge in Foreign Language Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 1992 .

[6]  Theo van Els,et al.  Applied linguistics and the learning and teaching of foreign languages , 1985 .

[7]  Carlo Tasso,et al.  Naive vs. Formal Grammars: A Case for Integration in the Design of a Foreign Language Tutor , 1992 .

[8]  Jadwiga Nawrocka-Fisiak,et al.  Foreign and second language learning: Littlewood, William, Language Acquisition Research and its implications for the classroom. Cambridge University Press, 1984, 111 pp., £3.95 , 1985 .

[9]  Kurt VanLehn,et al.  Repair Theory: A Generative Theory of Bugs in Procedural Skills , 1980, Cogn. Sci..

[10]  Douglas G. Creighton.  Le Nouveau Bescherelle. 3. La grammaire pour tous. Paris: Hatier, 1984Le Nouveau Bescherelle. 3. La grammaire pour tous. Paris: Hatier, 1984. Pp. 318. , 1985 .

[11]  Yorick Wilks,et al.  Building an Intelligent Second Language Tutoring System from Whatever Bits you Happen to Have Lying Around , 1992 .

[12]  J. Kruse.  Book review: User Models in Dialog Systems Edited by A. Kobsa and W. Wahlster (Springer-Verlag, 1989) , 1991, SGAR.

[13]  Wolfgang Menzel.  Error diagnosing and selection in a training system: for second language learning , 1988, COLING 1988.

[14]  Wm. Flint Smith.  Modern Technology in Foreign Language Education: Applications and Projects. The ACTFL Foreign Language Education Series. , 1989 .

[15]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Diagnostic Models for Procedural Bugs in Basic Mathematical Skills , 1978, Cogn. Sci..

[16]  Thierry Chanier,et al.  Knowledge Acquisition for Learner Modelling in Second Language Learning , 1992 .

[17]  Michael Zock.  SWIM or Sink: The Problem of Communicating Thought , 1992 .

[18]  Paul Meara,et al.  Applied Linguistics and the Learning and Teaching of Foreign Languages , 1986 .

[19]  Ethel Schuster.  The role of native grammars in correcting errors in second language learning , 1986, Comput. Intell..

[20]  Jack C. Richards,et al.  A non-contrastive approach to error analysis , 1970 .

[21]  Thierry Chanier,et al.  Compréhension de Textes dans un domaine technique :le système ACTES.Application des Grammaires d'Unification et de la Théorie du Discours , 1989 .

[22]  Ted Briscoe,et al.  Software Support for Practical Grammar Development , 1988, COLING.

[23]  Gerard Kempen,et al.  Intelligent modules for Dutch grammar instruction , 1990 .

[24]  Daniel M. Russell,et al.  FL-IDE: hypertext for structuring a conceptual design for computer-assisted language learning , 1989 .

[25]  Stuart M. Shieber,et al.  An Introduction to Unification-Based Approaches to Grammar , 1986, CSLI Lecture Notes.

[26]  Françoise Demaiziere,et al.  Learners’ Intuitions, Misconceptions and Errors , 1992 .

[27]  Alfred Kobsa,et al.  User Models in Dialog Systems , 1989, Symbolic Computation.

[28]  Henry Hamburger,et al.  Foreign Language Tutoring and Learning Environment , 1992 .

[29]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  The pedagogical limitations of generative student models , 1988 .

[30]  William Littlewood,et al.  Foreign and Second Language Learning Language Acquisition research and its applications for the classroom , 1984 .

[31]  Michael B. Twidale,et al.  Knowledge Acquisition for Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 1992 .

[32]  Mike Rosner,et al.  A rich environment for experimentation with unification grammars , 1989, EACL.

[33]  Stefano A. Cerri.  ALICE: Acquisition of linguistic items in the context of examples , 1989 .

[34]  Philip Howard Swann.  Theory and practice of computer-assisted language learning , 1992 .

[35]  Paul Brna,et al.  Confronting misconceptions in the domain of simple electrical circuits , 1988 .

[36]  Carlo Tasso,et al.  The Use of Explanation-Based Learning for Modelling Student Behavior in Foreign Language Tutoring , 1992 .

[37]  Andreas Digeser,et al.  Understanding second language acquisition , 1988, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[38]  Camilla Schwind,et al.  An Intelligent Language Tutoring System , 1990, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[39]  Angus McIntyre,et al.  Nobile: Object-Based User Model Acquisition for Second Language Learning , 1992 .