Data-driven generation of plausible tissue geometries for realistic photoacoustic image synthesis

Photoacoustic tomography (PAT) has the potential to recover morphological and functional tissue properties such as blood oxygenation with high spatial resolution and in an interventional setting. However, decades of research invested in solving the inverse problem of recovering clinically relevant tissue properties from spectral measurements have failed to produce solutions that can quantify tissue parameters robustly in a clinical setting. Previous attempts to address the limitations of model-based approaches with machine learning were hampered by the absence of labeled reference data needed for supervised algorithm training. While this bottleneck has been tackled by simulating training data, the domain gap between real and simulated images remains a huge unsolved challenge. As a first step to address this bottleneck, we propose a novel approach to PAT data simulation, which we refer to as "learning to simulate". Our approach involves subdividing the challenge of generating plausible simulations into two disjoint problems: (1) Probabilistic generation of realistic tissue morphology, represented by semantic segmentation maps and (2) pixel-wise assignment of corresponding optical and acoustic properties. In the present work, we focus on the first challenge. Specifically, we leverage the concept of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) trained on semantically annotated medical imaging data to generate plausible tissue geometries. According to an initial in silico feasibility study our approach is well-suited for contributing to realistic PAT image synthesis and could thus become a fundamental step for deep learning-based quantitative PAT.

[1]  L. Maier-Hein,et al.  Learned spectral decoloring enables photoacoustic oximetry , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[2]  Lena Maier-Hein,et al.  Semantic segmentation of multispectral photoacoustic images using deep learning , 2021, Photoacoustics.

[3]  Lena Maier-Hein,et al.  SIMPA: an open source toolkit for simulation and processing of photoacoustic images , 2021 .

[4]  Jaemoon Yang,et al.  Deep Generative Adversarial Networks: Applications in Musculoskeletal Imaging. , 2021, Radiology. Artificial intelligence.

[5]  F. Gao,et al.  Review of deep learning for photoacoustic imaging , 2020, Photoacoustics.

[6]  L. Maier-Hein,et al.  Deep learning for biomedical photoacoustic imaging: A review , 2020, Photoacoustics.

[7]  Andreas Hauptmann,et al.  Deep learning in photoacoustic tomography: current approaches and future directions , 2020, Journal of Biomedical Optics.

[8]  Vasilis Ntziachristos,et al.  Deep Learning-Based Spectral Unmixing for Optoacoustic Imaging of Tissue Oxygen Saturation , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Tong Lu,et al.  A deep learning method based on U-Net for quantitative photoacoustic imaging , 2020, BiOS.

[10]  Vasilis Ntziachristos,et al.  A review of clinical photoacoustic imaging: Current and future trends , 2019, Photoacoustics.

[11]  L. Maier-Hein,et al.  Methods and open-source toolkit for analyzing and visualizing challenge results , 2019, Scientific reports.

[12]  Lena Maier-Hein,et al.  Confidence Estimation for Machine Learning-Based Quantitative Photoacoustics , 2018, J. Imaging.

[13]  Jianwen Luo,et al.  End-to-end deep neural network for optical inversion in quantitative photoacoustic imaging. , 2018, Optics letters.

[14]  Jan Kautz,et al.  High-Resolution Image Synthesis and Semantic Manipulation with Conditional GANs , 2017, 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[15]  Lena Maier-Hein,et al.  Context encoding enables machine learning-based quantitative photoacoustics , 2017, Journal of biomedical optics.

[16]  Alexei A. Efros,et al.  Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networks , 2016, 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[17]  Soumith Chintala,et al.  Unsupervised Representation Learning with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networks , 2015, ICLR.

[18]  Lihong V Wang,et al.  Photoacoustic microscopy and computed tomography: from bench to bedside. , 2014, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[19]  P. Beard Biomedical photoacoustic imaging , 2011, Interface Focus.

[20]  David A Boas,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation of photon migration in 3D turbid media accelerated by graphics processing units. , 2009, Optics express.

[21]  Simon R Arridge,et al.  Two-dimensional quantitative photoacoustic image reconstruction of absorption distributions in scattering media by use of a simple iterative method. , 2006, Applied optics.

[22]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[23]  James Joseph,et al.  Towards Quantitative Evaluation of Tissue Absorption Coefficients Using Light Fluence Correction in Optoacoustic Tomography , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.