What you see is what you get? - A comparison of theoretical lenses to study technology in organizations

This paper investigates how the application of different theoretical lenses impacts theo-rizing on technology in organizations. Based on a case study of a corporate Wiki intro-duction, three theoretical lenses are applied as sensitizing devices: a process theoretical analysis based on the Enterprise Systems Experience Cycle (Markus and Tanis 2000), a structurational analysis based on technologies-in-practice (Orlikowski 2000), and a so-ciomaterial analysis based on the mangle of practice (Pickering 1995). The authors reflect upon their own experiences in applying these and present a comparison of their ob-servations. In doing so, the paper identifies and analyzes five emergent issues in theo-rizing across the three lenses: the role and nature of technology, technological change, changing practice, organizational change, and understanding stability. Similarities and differences among these three lenses are discussed and conclusions are drawn with re-spect to how what we as researchers see through our theoretical lenses determines what we will get in terms of theories. The paper thus presents other researchers with an op-portunity to reflect upon the authors’ experiences and supports the choice of an appro-priate theoretical lens for studying technology in organizations.

[1]  Janet Fulk,et al.  The Theory Imperative , 1990 .

[2]  Ron Weber,et al.  Editor's comment: theoretically speaking , 2003 .

[3]  W. Orlikowski.  The sociomateriality of organisational life: considering technology in management research , 2010 .

[4]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000, Theory in CSCW.

[5]  G. Ritzer.  Explorations in Social Theory: From Metatheorizing to Rationalization , 2001 .

[6]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  A Meta-Theory for Understanding Information Systems Within Sociotechnical Systems , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Kurt Lewin,et al.  The Research Center for Group Dynamics at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. , 1945 .

[8]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Paradigms Lost: Incommensurability vs Structurationist Inquiry , 1994 .

[9]  Philip Räth,et al.  Technology in Work and Non-work Life: Two Sides of a Coin? , 2012 .

[10]  K. Weick.  The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[11]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  When Flexible Routines Meet Flexible Technologies: Affordance, Constraint, and the Imbrication of Human and Material Agencies , 2011, MIS Q..

[12]  S. Barley.  Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[13]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Explaining Development and Change in Organizations , 1995 .

[14]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[15]  Simon K. Milton,et al.  Ontology as Meta-Theory: A Perspective , 2006, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[16]  P. H. Furfey.  The scope and method of sociology : a metasociological treatise, with a new introduction on the last dozen years , 2011 .

[17]  L. Willcocks,et al.  Social theory and philosophy for information systems , 2004 .

[18]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[19]  John Mingers,et al.  Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Suggestions for studying strategy process: A research note , 1992 .

[21]  Matthew R. Jones,et al.  Giddens's Structuration Theory and Information Systems Research , 2008, MIS Q..

[22]  John Law,et al.  Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity , 1992 .

[23]  Lawrence B. Mohr,et al.  Explaining Organizational Behavior: The Limits and Possibilities of Theory and Research. , 1983 .

[24]  Karlheinz Kautz,et al.  Sociomateriality - More than Jargon monoxide? Questions from the Jester to the Sovereigns , 2012, ECIS.

[25]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions , 2006 .

[26]  Tony Charman,et al.  What you see is what you get: contextual modulation of face scanning in typical and atypical development , 2013, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[27]  Neil C. Ramiller,et al.  "Airline Magazine Syndrome": Reading a myth of mismanagement , 2001, Inf. Technol. People.

[28]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[29]  J. Colquitt,et al.  TRENDS IN THEORY BUILDING AND THEORY TESTING: A FIVE-DECADE STUDY OF THE ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL , 2007 .

[30]  Andrew Abbott,et al.  A Primer on Sequence Methods , 1990 .

[31]  Philip Raeth,et al.  The Interaction of Organizational Structures and Technologies-in-Practice: a Structuralist Analysis , 2011, ICIS.

[32]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[33]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  ORGANIZATIONS: A MULTILEVEL PERSPECTIVE , 2007 .

[34]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[35]  Anna Croon,et al.  Reframing the Notion of Context in Information Systems Research , 1998 .

[36]  Allen S. Lee.  Editor's comments: MIS quarterly's editorial policies and practices , 2001 .

[37]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change ed. by Wiebe E. Bijker, John Law (review) , 1994, Technology and Culture.

[38]  W. Orlikowski.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000 .

[39]  A. Langley.  Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[40]  Anna Sidorova,et al.  Uncovering the Intellectual Core of the Information Systems Discipline , 2008, MIS Q..

[41]  A. V. D. Ven.  SUGGESTIONS FOR STUDYING STRATEGY PROCESS: A RESEARCH NOTE , 1992 .

[42]  A. Pickering.  The Mangle of Practice: Agency and Emergence in the Sociology of Science , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[43]  M. Markus,et al.  The Enterprise System Experience— From Adoption to Success , 2000 .

[44]  A. Pinsonneault,et al.  Challenges in Conducting Empirical Work Using Structuration Theory: Learning from IT Research , 2005 .

[45]  George Ritzer,et al.  Metatheorizing in Sociology. , 1992 .

[46]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  The Adoption of Web 2.0 in Corporations: A Process Perspective , 2010, AMCIS.

[47]  Samuel B. Bacharach,et al.  Organizational Theories: Some Criteria for Evaluation , 1989 .

[48]  Ron Weber,et al.  Editor's comment: still desperately seeking the IT artifact , 2003 .

[49]  K. Popper,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1960 .

[50]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[51]  E. Shils.  The Constitution Of Society , 1982 .

[52]  Susan V. Scott,et al.  10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization , 2008 .

[53]  Sue Newell,et al.  Understanding Project Survival in an ES Environment: A Sociomaterial Practice Perspective , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[54]  Ron Weber,et al.  Evaluating and Developing Theories in the Information Systems Discipline , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[55]  Karen Barad.  Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter , 2003, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[56]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, , . , 2011 .

[57]  A. Giddens.  The Constitution of Society , 1985 .

[58]  Philip Raeth,et al.  Technology and the Separation of Work and Non-Work Life: Two Sides of a Coin? , 2011 .

[59]  Andrew Pickering,et al.  The mangle of practice : time, agency, and science , 1997 .

[60]  Neil C. Ramiller,et al.  Management Implications in Information Systems Research: The Untold Story , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[61]  Burton-JonesAndrew,et al.  Toward a deeper understanding of system usage in organizations , 2007 .

[62]  W. Orlikowski.  The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations , 2014 .

[63]  J. Summers,et al.  “What you see is what you get” , 2005 .