A comparison of univariate methods for forecasting container throughput volumes

In this paper, six univariate forecasting models for the container throughput volumes in Taiwan's three major ports are presented. The six univariate models include the classical decomposition model, the trigonometric regression model, the regression model with seasonal dummy variables, the grey model, the hybrid grey model, and the SARIMA model. The purpose of this paper is to search for a model that can provide the most accurate prediction of container throughput. By applying monthly data to these models and comparing the prediction results based on mean absolute error, mean absolute percent error and root mean squared error, we find that in general the classical decomposition model appears to be the best model for forecasting container throughput with seasonal variations. The result of this study may be helpful for predicting the short-term variation in demand for the container throughput of other international ports.

[1]  J. Deng,et al.  Introduction to Grey system theory , 1989 .

[2]  P. McSharry,et al.  A comparison of univariate methods for forecasting electricity demand up to a day ahead , 2006 .

[3]  Spyros Makridakis,et al.  The M3-Competition: results, conclusions and implications , 2000 .

[4]  Guoqiang Peter Zhang,et al.  Quarterly Time-Series Forecasting With Neural Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[5]  G. Zhang,et al.  A comparative study of linear and nonlinear models for aggregate retail sales forecasting , 2003 .

[6]  E. Ziegel.  Forecasting and Time Series: An Applied Approach , 2000 .

[7]  Gwilym M. Jenkins,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1971 .

[8]  Eddie C.M. Hui,et al.  Forecasting Cargo Throughput for the Port of Hong Kong: Error Correction Model Approach , 2004 .

[9]  Pablo Coto-Millán,et al.  Determinants of the demand for maritime imports and exports , 2005 .

[10]  William H. K. Lam,et al.  Forecasts and reliability analysis of port cargo throughput in Hong Kong , 2004 .

[11]  William H. K. Lam,et al.  Forecasting cargo growth and regional role of the port of Hong Kong , 2003 .

[12]  M. Fung,et al.  Forecasting Hong Kong's container throughput: an error-correction model , 2002 .

[13]  Robert L. Winkler,et al.  The accuracy of extrapolation (time series) methods: Results of a forecasting competition , 1982 .

[14]  George E. P. Box,et al.  Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control , 1977 .

[15]  R. Fildes,et al.  The Impact of Empirical Accuracy Studies On Time Series Analysis and Forecasting , 1995 .

[16]  Gwilym M. Jenkins,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1972 .

[17]  Xiuli Tang.  TIME SERIES FORECASTING OF QUARTERLY BARGE GRAIN TONNAGE ON THE MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM , 2000 .

[18]  Michael W. Babcock,et al.  Time series forecasting of quarterly railroad grain carloadings , 1999 .

[19]  Michael W. Babcock,et al.  Forecasting inland waterway grain traffic , 2002 .

[20]  Fang-Mei Tseng,et al.  Applied Hybrid Grey Model to Forecast Seasonal Time Series , 2001 .

[21]  Jan G. De Gooijer,et al.  Forecasting the Antwerp maritime steel traffic flow: A case study , 1989 .

[22]  Simme Veldman,et al.  A Model on Container Port Competition: An Application for the West European Container Hub-Ports , 2003 .

[23]  Philip Hans Franses,et al.  The forecasting performance of various models for seasonality and nonlinearity for quarterly industrial production , 2001 .

[24]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Beyond Accuracy: Comparison of Criteria Used to Select Forecasting Methods , 1995 .