On probabilistically defined margins in radiation therapy

Margins about a target volume subject to external beam radiation therapy are designed to assure that the target volume of tissue to be sterilized by treatment is adequately covered by a lethal dose. Thus, margins are meant to guarantee that all potential variation in tumour position relative to beams allows the tumour to stay within the margin. Variation in tumour position can be broken into two types of dislocations, reducible and irreducible. Reducible variations in tumour position are those that can be accommodated with the use of modern image-guided techniques that derive parameters for compensating motions of patient bodies and/or motions of beams relative to patient bodies. Irreducible variations in tumour position are those random dislocations of a target that are related to errors intrinsic in the design and performance limitations of the software and hardware, as well as limitations of human perception and decision making. Thus, margins in the era of image-guided treatments will need to accommodate only random errors residual in patient setup accuracy (after image-guided setup corrections) and in the accuracy of systems designed to track moving and deforming tissues of the targeted regions of the patient's body. Therefore, construction of these margins will have to be based on purely statistical data. The characteristics of these data have to be determined through the central limit theorem and Gaussian properties of limiting error distributions. In this paper, we show how statistically determined margins are to be designed in the general case of correlated distributions of position errors in three-dimensional space. In particular, we show how the minimal margins for a given level of statistical confidence are found. Then, how they are to be used to determine geometrically minimal PTV that provides coverage of GTV at the assumed level of statistical confidence. Our results generalize earlier recommendations for statistical, central limit theorem-based recommendations for margin construction that were derived for uncorrelated distributions of errors (van Herk, Remeijer, Rasch and Lebesque 2000 Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 47 1121-35; Stroom, De Boer, Huizenga and Visser 1999 Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 43 905-19).

[1]  P. Greer,et al.  Set-up variation of patients treated with radiotherapy to the prostate measured with an electronic portal imaging device. , 1998, Australasian radiology.

[2]  D. Gladstone,et al.  A numerical simulation of organ motion and daily setup uncertainties: implications for radiation therapy. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  A. Brahme,et al.  Optimal radiation beam profiles considering uncertainties in beam patient alignment. , 1993, Acta oncologica.

[4]  M van Herk,et al.  Computerized design of target margins for treatment uncertainties in conformal radiotherapy. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  M van Herk,et al.  A verification procedure to improve patient set-up accuracy using portal images. , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  M Goitein,et al.  Immobilization error: some theoretical considerations. , 1975, Radiology.

[7]  P Aaltonen,et al.  Specification of dose delivery in radiation therapy. Recommendation by the Nordic Association of Clinical Physics (NACP). , 1997, Acta oncologica.

[8]  B Pickett,et al.  Indications for and the significance of seminal vesicle irradiation during 3D conformal radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  M Coghe,et al.  Routine clinical on-line portal imaging followed by immediate field adjustment using a tele-controlled patient couch. , 1992, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[10]  M van Herk,et al.  Quantification of organ motion during conformal radiotherapy of the prostate by three dimensional image registration. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  M Goitein,et al.  Strategies for treating possible tumor extension: some theoretical considerations. , 1985, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  A Bel,et al.  High-precision prostate cancer irradiation by clinical application of an offline patient setup verification procedure, using portal imaging. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  C. Pelizzari,et al.  Evaluation of changes in the size and location of the prostate, seminal vesicles, bladder, and rectum during a course of external beam radiation therapy. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  A Bel,et al.  Time trend of patient setup deviations during pelvic irradiation using electronic portal imaging. , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[15]  R E Vijlbrief,et al.  Setup deviations in wedged pair irradiation of parotid gland and tonsillar tumors, measured with an electronic portal imaging device. , 1995, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[16]  L. Verhey,et al.  Defining treatment margins for six field conformal irradiation of localized prostate cancer. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  J. Leong,et al.  Implementation of random positioning error in computerised radiation treatment planning systems as a result of fractionation. , 1987, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  M Goitein,et al.  Calculation of the uncertainty in the dose delivered during radiation therapy. , 1985, Medical physics.

[19]  A. Brahme,et al.  An adaptive control algorithm for optimization of intensity modulated radiotherapy considering uncertainties in beam profiles, patient set-up and internal organ motion. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  T. Landberg,et al.  What margins should be added to the clinical target volume in radiotherapy treatment planning for lung cancer? , 1998, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[21]  D. Yan,et al.  Adaptive radiation therapy , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  D Yan,et al.  An off-line strategy for constructing a patient-specific planning target volume in adaptive treatment process for prostate cancer. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  M van Herk,et al.  Definition of the prostate in CT and MRI: a multi-observer study. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  G J Kutcher,et al.  Measurement of patient positioning errors in three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy of the prostate. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  G J Kutcher,et al.  The effect of setup uncertainties on the treatment of nasopharynx cancer. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  Icru Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon beam therapy , 1993 .

[27]  A G Visser,et al.  A quality control study of the accuracy of patient positioning in irradiation of pelvic fields. , 1996, International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics.

[28]  B Mijnheer,et al.  Current clinical practice versus new developments in target volume and dose specification procedures: a contradiction? , 1997, Acta oncologica.

[29]  W. Stanford,et al.  Analysis of movement of intrathoracic neoplasms using ultrafast computerized tomography. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[30]  J C Stroom,et al.  Inclusion of geometrical uncertainties in radiotherapy treatment planning by means of coverage probability. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[31]  M Wannenmacher,et al.  Combined error of patient positioning variability and prostate motion uncertainty in 3D conformal radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[32]  M van Herk,et al.  A general methodology for three-dimensional analysis of variation in target volume delineation. , 1999, Medical physics.

[33]  R. A. Silverman,et al.  Vector and Tensor Analysis with Applications , 1969 .

[34]  J C Stroom,et al.  Automatic calculation of three-dimensional margins around treatment volumes in radiotherapy planning. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[35]  M Wannenmacher,et al.  Influence of the positioning error on 3D conformal dose distributions during fractionated radiotherapy. , 1994, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[36]  J C Rosenwald,et al.  Automatic three-dimensional expansion of structures applied to determination of the clinical target volume in conformal radiotherapy. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[37]  A. A. Borovkov,et al.  On the Multi-Dimensional Central Limit Theorem , 1965 .

[38]  R Mohan,et al.  A method of incorporating organ motion uncertainties into three-dimensional conformal treatment plans. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[39]  K Lam,et al.  Measurement of prostate movement over the course of routine radiotherapy using implanted markers. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[40]  B. Heijmen,et al.  Multiple two-dimensional versus three-dimensional PTV definition in treatment planning for conformal radiotherapy. , 1998, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[41]  A G Visser,et al.  Quality assurance using portal imaging: the accuracy of patient positioning in irradiation of breast cancer. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[42]  J. Crook,et al.  Prostate motion during standard radiotherapy as assessed by fiducial markers. , 1995, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[43]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  The probability of correct target dosage: dose-population histograms for deriving treatment margins in radiotherapy. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[44]  M. Roach,et al.  The impact of isocenter placement errors associated with dose distributions used in irradiating prostate cancer. , 1996, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[45]  M van Herk,et al.  Target margins for random geometrical treatment uncertainties in conformal radiotherapy. , 1996, Medical physics.

[46]  I. Kalet,et al.  Three dimensional planning target volumes: a model and a software tool. , 1995, International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics.

[47]  D. Jones,et al.  An estimate of the margin required when defining blocks around the prostate. , 1995, The British journal of radiology.

[48]  H. Withers,et al.  Alpha/beta value and the importance of size of dose per fraction for late complications in the supraglottic larynx. , 1986, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.