Ungulate Reproductive Parameters Track Satellite Observations of Plant Phenology across Latitude and Climatological Regimes

The effect of climatically-driven plant phenology on mammalian reproduction is one key to predicting species-specific demographic responses to climate change. Large ungulates face their greatest energetic demands from the later stages of pregnancy through weaning, and so in seasonal environments parturition dates should match periods of high primary productivity. Interannual variation in weather influences the quality and timing of forage availability, which can influence neonatal survival. Here, we evaluated macro-scale patterns in reproductive performance of a widely distributed ungulate (mule deer, Odocoileus hemionus) across contrasting climatological regimes using satellite-derived indices of primary productivity and plant phenology over eight degrees of latitude (890 km) in the American Southwest. The dataset comprised > 180,000 animal observations taken from 54 populations over eight years (2004–2011). Regionally, both the start and peak of growing season (“Start” and “Peak”, respectively) are negatively and significantly correlated with latitude, an unusual pattern stemming from a change in the dominance of spring snowmelt in the north to the influence of the North American Monsoon in the south. Corresponding to the timing and variation in both the Start and Peak, mule deer reproduction was latest, lowest, and most variable at lower latitudes where plant phenology is timed to the onset of monsoonal moisture. Parturition dates closely tracked the growing season across space, lagging behind the Start and preceding the Peak by 27 and 23 days, respectively. Mean juvenile production increased, and variation decreased, with increasing latitude. Temporally, juvenile production was best predicted by primary productivity during summer, which encompassed late pregnancy, parturition, and early lactation. Our findings offer a parsimonious explanation of two key reproductive parameters in ungulate demography, timing of parturition and mean annual production, across latitude and changing climatological regimes. Practically, this demonstrates the potential for broad-scale modeling of couplings between climate, plant phenology, and animal populations using space-borne observations.

[1]  Hall Sawyer,et al.  Stopover ecology of a migratory ungulate. , 2011, The Journal of animal ecology.

[2]  Eric Vermote,et al.  Atmospheric correction for the monitoring of land surfaces , 2008 .

[3]  P. Lendrum,et al.  Migrating Mule Deer: Effects of Anthropogenically Altered Landscapes , 2013, PloS one.

[4]  Tavis D. Forrester,et al.  A review of the population dynamics of mule deer and black‐tailed deer Odocoileus hemionus in North America , 2013 .

[5]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Can we use the young : female ratio to infer ungulate population dynamics? An empirical test using red deer Cervus elaphus as a model , 2005 .

[6]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Population abundance and early spring conditions determine variation in body mass of juvenile chamois , 2011 .

[7]  Nyeema C. Harris,et al.  Inferences About Ungulate Population Dynamics Derived From Age Ratios , 2008 .

[8]  Nevelyn E. Headrick Mule Deer Conservation: Issues and Management Strategies , 2003 .

[9]  E. Milner‐Gulland,et al.  Tracking greenery across a latitudinal gradient in central Asia – the migration of the saiga antelope , 2010 .

[10]  Christine C. Hass Seasonality of births in bighorn sheep , 1997 .

[11]  Atle Mysterud,et al.  A Migratory Northern Ungulate in the Pursuit of Spring: Jumping or Surfing the Green Wave? , 2012, The American Naturalist.

[12]  Kjell Arild Høgda,et al.  Environmental phenology and geographical gradients in moose body mass , 2006, Oecologia.

[13]  R. Bowyer,et al.  Top-down versus bottom-up forcing: evidence from mountain lions and mule deer , 2012 .

[14]  Cory R. Davis,et al.  Exposure of U.S. National Parks to land use and climate change 1900-2100. , 2014, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[15]  S. Albon,et al.  Plant phenology and the benefits of migration in a temperate ungulate , 1992 .

[16]  Dennis D. Austin Mule Deer , 2013 .

[17]  J. Winnie,et al.  The utility of normalized difference vegetation index for predicting African buffalo forage quality , 2012 .

[18]  Daniel D. Olson,et al.  Timing and synchrony of births in bighorn sheep: implications for reintroduction and conservation , 2012, Wildlife Research.

[19]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Wild Mammals of North America. , 1983 .

[20]  R. B. Gill,et al.  Effect of Snow Depth on Mule Deer in Middle Park, Colorado , 1970 .

[21]  J. Hopcraft,et al.  Serengeti wildebeest migratory patterns modeled from rainfall and new vegetation growth. , 2006, Ecology.

[22]  Christopher Justice,et al.  Towards a Generalized Approach for Correction of the BRDF Effect in MODIS Directional Reflectances , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[23]  Naomi Naik,et al.  Projections of Declining Surface-Water Availability for the Southwestern United States , 2013 .

[24]  N. Hobbs Modification of Ecosystems by Ungulates , 1996 .

[25]  Nathalie Pettorelli,et al.  Early onset of vegetation growth vs. rapid green-up: impacts on juvenile mountain ungulates. , 2007, Ecology.

[26]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Population dynamics of large herbivores: variable recruitment with constant adult survival. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[27]  Lawrence J. Cook,et al.  Assessment of costs associated with deer–vehicle collisions: human death and injury, vehicle damage, and deer loss , 2008 .

[28]  G. MacDonald,et al.  Water, climate change, and sustainability in the southwest , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  A. Mysterud,et al.  Seasonality, weather and climate affect home range size in roe deer across a wide latitudinal gradient within Europe. , 2013, The Journal of animal ecology.

[30]  Alan A. Berryman,et al.  Limiting factors and population regulation , 2004 .

[31]  J. Linnell,et al.  Timing and synchrony of birth in a hider species, the roe deer Capreolus capreolus , 1998 .

[32]  Nathalie Pettorelli,et al.  Climate predictability and breeding phenology in red deer: timing and synchrony of rutting and calving in Norway and France , 2005 .

[33]  Mark Hebblewhite,et al.  Functional analysis of Normalized Difference Vegetation Index curves reveals overwinter mule deer survival is driven by both spring and autumn phenology , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  A. Comrie,et al.  The North American Monsoon , 1997 .

[35]  S. Rosenstock,et al.  Review of big-game survey methods used by wildlife agencies of the western United States , 2002 .

[36]  Ned Horning,et al.  Ten ways remote sensing can contribute to conservation , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[37]  John G. Kie,et al.  Life-History Characteristics of Mule Deer: Effects of Nutrition in a Variable Environment , 2014 .

[38]  E. Post,et al.  Climate change reduces reproductive success of an Arctic herbivore through trophic mismatch , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Early development and population dynamics in red deer. I: Density-dependent effects on juvenile survival , 1987 .

[40]  M. D. Schwartz Phenology: An Integrative Environmental Science , 2003, Tasks for Vegetation Science.

[41]  K. Parker,et al.  Nutrition integrates environmental responses of ungulates. , 2009 .

[42]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  Using a proxy of plant productivity (NDVI) to find key periods for animal performance: the case of roe deer , 2006 .

[43]  T. Stephenson,et al.  Timing of seasonal migration in mule deer: effects of climate, plant phenology, and life‐history characteristics , 2011 .

[44]  Heather H. Bernales,et al.  UTAH BIG GAME ANNUAL REPORT , 2012 .

[45]  Robert A. Garrott,et al.  Climate-induced variation in vital rates of an unharvested large-herbivore population , 2003 .

[46]  C. Tucker Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation , 1979 .

[47]  Mark A. Hurley,et al.  Demographic Response of Mule Deer to Experimental Reduction of Coyotes and Mountain Lions in Southeastern Idaho , 2011 .

[48]  David W. Pierce,et al.  Future dryness in the southwest US and the hydrology of the early 21st century drought , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  Nils Chr. Stenseth,et al.  CLIMATIC VARIABILITY, PLANT PHENOLOGY, AND NORTHERN UNGULATES , 1999 .

[50]  G. White,et al.  Effect of Enhanced Nutrition on Mule Deer Population Rate of Change , 2009 .

[51]  Gil Bohrer,et al.  In search of greener pastures: Using satellite images to predict the effects of environmental change on zebra migration , 2013 .

[52]  J. A. Schell,et al.  Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS , 1973 .

[53]  R. Bowyer Timing of Parturition and Lactation in Southern Mule Deer , 1991 .

[54]  T. Swetnam,et al.  Mesoscale Disturbance and Ecological Response to Decadal Climatic Variability in the American Southwest , 1998 .

[55]  Torkild Tveraa,et al.  Population Densities, Vegetation Green-Up, and Plant Productivity: Impacts on Reproductive Success and Juvenile Body Mass in Reindeer , 2013, PloS one.

[56]  Heather H. Bernales Development of an innovative statewide population monitoring program for mule deer , 2010 .

[57]  J. Kie,et al.  Timing and Synchrony of Parturition in Alaskan Moose: Long-Term Versus Proximal Effects of Climate , 1998 .

[58]  W. Turner Sensing biodiversity , 2014, Science.

[59]  K. I. Jönsson,et al.  Capital and income breeding as alternative tactics of resource use in reproduction , 1997 .

[60]  J. Ogutu,et al.  Responses of phenology, synchrony and fecundity of breeding by African ungulates to interannual variation in rainfall , 2014, Wildlife Research.

[61]  L. Bender Uses of Herd Composition and Age Ratios in Ungulate Management , 2006 .

[62]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  Satellite remote sensing for applied ecologists: opportunities and challenges , 2014 .

[63]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI): unforeseen successes in animal ecology , 2011 .

[64]  Eric Post,et al.  LARGE‐SCALE SPATIAL GRADIENTS IN HERBIVORE POPULATION DYNAMICS , 2005 .

[65]  O. C. Wallmo Mule and black-tailed deer of North America. , 1982 .

[66]  G. White,et al.  Mule deer survival in Colorado, Idaho, and Montana , 1999 .

[67]  M. Stoffel,et al.  Tree rings and natural hazards - A state-of-the-art , 2010 .

[68]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[69]  Steeve D. Côté,et al.  Spring Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) predicts annual variation in timing of peak faecal crude protein in mountain ungulates , 2009 .

[70]  A. J. Mark Hewison,et al.  Mismatch Between Birth Date and Vegetation Phenology Slows the Demography of Roe Deer , 2014, PLoS biology.

[71]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Roe Deer Population Growth and Lynx Predation along a Gradient of Environmental Productivity and Climate in Norway , 2010 .

[72]  E. Post,et al.  Reproductive Phenology of Large Mammals , 2013 .