Quality of life after contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in newly diagnosed high-risk breast cancer patients who underwent BRCA1/2 gene testing.

PURPOSE Recent studies indicate that high-risk breast cancer patients (ie, women who carry mutations in BRCA1/2 genes) who opt for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) have a substantially reduced risk of developing contralateral breast cancer. However, the immediate and long-term impact of this decision on women's quality of life and psychosocial functioning is largely unknown. In this study, we compared the impact of BRCA1/2 genetic test result and CPM on these outcomes among newly diagnosed breast cancer patients who opted for CPM at the time of their definitive surgical treatment versus patients who did not. PATIENTS AND METHODS Participants were 149 high-risk women who underwent genetic counseling and testing for alterations in the BRCA1/2 genes. We measured self-reported quality of life, cancer-specific distress, and genetic testing-specific distress using standardized instruments before receipt of genetic test results and again 1 and 12 months later. RESULTS Compared with patients who chose breast conservation or unilateral mastectomy, those who chose mastectomy of the affected breast and CPM of the unaffected breast did not report diminished quality of life or elevated distress. CONCLUSION With respect to quality of life and distress, patients who choose CPM fare as well as those who do not in the first year after surgery.

[1]  S. Gruber,et al.  Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast and ovarian. , 2010, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[2]  Sarah M. Greene,et al.  Contentment with quality of life among breast cancer survivors with and without contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  A. Stolier,et al.  Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patients Choose Bilateral Mastectomy over Breast-Conserving Surgery When Testing Positive for a BRCA1/2 Mutation , 2005, The American surgeon.

[4]  A. Howell,et al.  Surgical decisions made by 158 women with hereditary breast cancer aged <50 years. , 2005, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[5]  M. Schwartz Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: efficacy, satisfaction, and regret. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  Sarah M. Greene,et al.  Women's decision-making roles regarding contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[7]  T. Sellers,et al.  Satisfaction after contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: the significance of mastectomy type, reconstructive complications, and body appearance. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  C. Isaacs,et al.  Evaluation and management of women with BRCA1/2 mutations. , 2005, Oncology.

[9]  L. V. van't Veer,et al.  Risk reduction of contralateral breast cancer and survival after contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers , 2005, British Journal of Cancer.

[10]  R. Eeles,et al.  Too much, too soon? Patients and health professionals' views concerning the impact of genetic testing at the time of breast cancer diagnosis in women under the age of 40. , 2005, European journal of cancer care.

[11]  J. Elmore,et al.  Efficacy of prophylactic mastectomy in women with unilateral breast cancer: a cancer research network project. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  K. Helzlsouer Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: quantifying benefits and weighing the harms. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  B. Paz,et al.  Genetic cancer risk assessment in the newly diagnosed breast cancer patient is useful and possible in practice. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  C. Isaacs,et al.  Utilization of BRCA1/BRCA2 Mutation Testing in Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patients , 2005, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[15]  A. Stolier,et al.  Initial Experience with Surgical Treatment Planning in the Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patient at High Risk for BRCA‐1 or BRCA‐2 Mutation , 2004, The breast journal.

[16]  Ellen Warner,et al.  Contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  C. Magnant,et al.  Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 counseling and testing on newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  M. Daly Tailoring breast cancer treatment to genetic status: the challenges ahead. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  J. Weitzel,et al.  Effect of genetic cancer risk assessment on surgical decisions at breast cancer diagnosis. , 2003, Archives of surgery.

[20]  C. Isaacs,et al.  Bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy and ovarian cancer screening following BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  Adopted on March American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  J. Coyne,et al.  What do ratings of cancer‐specific distress mean among women at high risk of breast and ovarian cancer? , 2003, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[23]  D. Cella,et al.  A brief assessment of concerns associated with genetic testing for cancer: the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) questionnaire. , 2002, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[24]  C. Isaacs,et al.  Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing on psychologic distress in a clinic-based sample. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  T. Sellers,et al.  Efficacy of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a personal and family history of breast cancer. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  T. Sellers,et al.  Long-term satisfaction and psychological and social function following bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. , 2000, JAMA.

[27]  C. Isaacs,et al.  Spiritual faith and genetic testing decisions among high-risk breast cancer probands. , 2000, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[28]  P. Ganz,et al.  Quality of life in the first year after breast cancer surgery: rehabilitation needs and patterns of recovery , 1999, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[29]  S. Cummings,et al.  Sequence analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2: correlation of mutations with family history and ovarian cancer risk. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[30]  F. Couch,et al.  BRCA1 mutations in women attending clinics that evaluate the risk of breast cancer. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  D S Tulsky,et al.  Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality-of-life instrument. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  M. Seller,et al.  Unusual case of Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome "type II". , 1995, American journal of medical genetics.

[33]  D. Tulsky,et al.  The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[34]  M. Horowitz,et al.  Impact of Event Scale: A Measure of Subjective Stress , 1979, Psychosomatic medicine.

[35]  L. Norton,et al.  Appropriateness of breast‐conserving treatment of breast carcinoma in women with germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 , 2005, Cancer.

[36]  H. Olsson Cancer risks in BRCA2 mutation carriers. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[37]  D. Berry,et al.  Determining carrier probabilities for breast cancer-susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[38]  P. Ganz,et al.  Impact of different adjuvant therapy strategies on quality of life in breast cancer survivors. , 1998, Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer.

[39]  L. Norton,et al.  Prevalence of recurring BRCA mutations among Ashkenazi Jewish women with breast cancer. , 1997, Genetic testing.

[40]  D. Easton,et al.  Breast and ovarian cancer incidence in BRCA1-mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. , 1995, American journal of human genetics.