Summary and Recommendations from a SETAC Pellston Workshop on In Situ Measures of Ecological Effects

Abstract The objective of a SETAC Pellston Workshop held in Portland, Oregon, USA, in November 2004 was to evaluate the use of field-based biological effects and exposure techniques in the hazard and risk assessment of aquatic ecosystems, thereby improving the accuracy and relevance of the decision-making process. This objective was addressed by keynote presentations outlining the state of the science and providing case studies, followed by work-group discussions focusing on 4 main areas: 1) Improving stressor–effect diagnostic capability in the assessment process; 2) maximizing efficiency, quality assurance and quality control, and broad-scale applicability of in situ field bioassays and experimental approaches; 3) determining the ecological relevance and consequences of individual and food chain–based effect measures; and 4) incorporating results from field-based effect methods into a weight-of-evidence decision-making process. Major outcomes from group discussions are highlighted, and future priorities for research in this area are recommended.

[1]  Marc S Greenberg,et al.  In situ exposures using caged organisms: a multi-compartment approach to detect aquatic toxicity and bioaccumulation. , 2005, Environmental pollution.

[2]  W. Clements,et al.  Assessing the influence of water and substratum quality on benthic macroinvertebrate communities in a metal-polluted stream: an experimental approach , 2002 .

[3]  Mark Crane,et al.  Review of Aquatic In Situ Approaches for Stressor and Effect Diagnosis , 2007, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[4]  A. Gerhardt,et al.  The multispecies freshwater biomonitor a potential new tool for sediment biotests and biomonitoring , 2002 .

[5]  Christer Hogstrand,et al.  Use of Sediment Quality Guidelines and Related Tools for the Assessment of Contaminated Sediments , 2005 .

[6]  Sebastiaan A.L.M. Kooijman,et al.  Dynamic Energy and Mass Budgets in Biological Systems , 2000 .

[7]  G. Burton,et al.  Optimizing interpretation of in situ effects of riverine pollutants: Impact of upwelling and downwelling , 2002, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[8]  Matthias Liess,et al.  In Situ–Based Effects Measures: Determining the Ecological Relevance of Measured Responses , 2007, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[9]  Andrew Green,et al.  In Situ–Based Effects Measures: Considerations for Improving Methods and Approaches , 2007, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[10]  William Adams,et al.  In Situ Methods of Measurement—An Important Line of Evidence in the Environmental Risk Framework , 2007, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[11]  Christer Hogstrand,et al.  Utilizing Sediment Assessment Tools and a Weight of Evidence Approach , 2005 .

[12]  Lorraine Maltby,et al.  Evaluation of the Gammarus pulex in situ feeding assay as a biomonitor of water quality: Robustness, responsiveness, and relevance , 2002, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[13]  R. Brua,et al.  Effects of pulp mill effluent on benthic assemblages in mesocosms along the Saint John River, Canada , 2003, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.