A Developmental Model of Syntax Acquisition in the Construction Grammar Framework with Cross-Linguistic Validation in English and Japanese

The current research demonstrates a system inspired by cognitive neuroscience and developmental psychology that learns to construct mappings between the grammatical structure of sentences and the structure of their meaning representations. Sentence to meaning mappings are learned and stored as grammatical constructions. These are stored and retrieved from a construction inventory based on the constellation of closed class items uniquely identifying each construction. These learned mappings allow the system to processes natural language sentences in order to reconstruct complex internal representations of the meanings these sentences describe. The system demonstrates error free performance and systematic generalization for a rich subset of English constructions that includes complex hierarchical grammatical structure, and generalizes systematically to new sentences of the learned construction categories. Further testing demonstrates (1) the capability to accommodate a significantly extended set of constructions, and (2) extension to Japanese, a free word order language that is structurally quite different from English, thus demonstrating the extensibility of the structure mapping model.

[1]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Electrophysiological Signatures of Visual Lexical Processing: Open-and Closed-Class Words , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  M. Tomasello The item-based nature of children’s early syntactic development , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  Brian MacWhinney,et al.  Functional constraints on sentence processing: A cross-linguistic study , 1982, Cognition.

[4]  Peter Ford Dominey,et al.  Neural network processing of natural language: I. Sensitivity to serial, temporal and abstract structure of language in the infant , 2000 .

[5]  Jordan B. Pollack,et al.  Recursive Distributed Representations , 1990, Artif. Intell..

[6]  J. Zwart The Minimalist Program , 1998, Journal of Linguistics.

[7]  Jeffrey Mark Siskind,et al.  Grounding the Lexical Semantics of Verbs in Visual Perception using Force Dynamics and Event Logic , 1999, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[8]  T. Maia,et al.  Grounded Learning of Grammatical Constructions , 2001 .

[9]  Julian M. Pine,et al.  Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. , 2004 .

[10]  J. Werker,et al.  Newborn infants’ sensitivity to perceptual cues to lexical and grammatical words , 1999, Cognition.

[11]  Kathy Hirsh-Pasek,et al.  The Origins of Grammar: Evidence from Early Language Comprehension , 1999 .

[12]  Renée Baillargeon,et al.  The development of calibration-based reasoning about collision events in young infants , 1998, Cognition.

[13]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Learning words from sights and sounds: a computational model , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[14]  R. Langacker Foundations of cognitive grammar , 1983 .

[15]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[16]  Luc Steels,et al.  Language games for autonomous robots , 2001 .

[17]  Peter Ford Dominey,et al.  Neurological basis of language and sequential cognition: Evidence from simulation, aphasia, and ERP studies , 2003, Brain and Language.

[18]  Andreas Stolcke,et al.  Miniature Language Acquisition: A Touchstone for Cognitive Science , 2002 .

[19]  Risto Miikkulainen,et al.  Subsymbolic Case-Role Analysis of Sentences With Embedded Clauses , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[20]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Finding Structure in Time , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[21]  Andreas Stolcke,et al.  Inducing Probabilistic Grammars by Bayesian Model Merging , 1994, ICGI.

[22]  Peter Ford Dominey Conceptual grounding in simulation studies of language acquisition , 2000 .