Phase II Window Study of Olaparib Alone or with Cisplatin or Durvalumab in Operable Head and Neck Cancer

Purpose: We conducted a phase II randomized noncomparative window of opportunity (WOO) trial to evaluate the inhibition of cellular proliferation and the modulation of immune microenvironment after treatment with olaparib alone or in combination with cisplatin or durvalumab in patients with operable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Experimental Design: Forty-one patients with HNSCC were randomized to cisplatin plus olaparib (arm A), olaparib alone (arm B), no treatment (arm C) or durvalumab plus olaparib (arm D). The primary endpoint was to evaluate the percentage of patients in each arm that achieved a reduction of at least 25% in Ki67. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), safety, and pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Paired baseline and resection tumor biopsies and blood samples were evaluated for prespecified biomarkers. Results: A decrease in Ki67 of at least 25% was observed in 44.8% of treated patients, as measured by quantitative immunofluorescence. The ORR among treated patients was 12.1%. pCR was observed in 2 patients. Two serious adverse events occurred in 2 patients. Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) levels [combined positive score (CPS)] were significantly higher after treatment in arms A and D. Expression of CD163 and colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) genes, markers of M2 macrophages, increased significantly posttreatment whereas the expression of CD80, a marker of M1 macrophages, decreased. Conclusion: Preoperative olaparib with cisplatin or alone or with durvalumab was safe in the preoperative setting and led to decrease in Ki67 of at least 25% in 44.8% of treated patients. Olaparib-based treatment modulates the tumor microenvironment leading to upregulation of PD-L1 and induction of protumor features of macrophages. Significance: HNSCC is characterized by defective DNA repair pathways and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. PARP inhibitors, which promote DNA damage and “reset” the inflammatory tumor microenvironment, can establish an effective antitumor response. This phase II WOO trial in HNSCC demonstrated the immunomodulatory effects of PARP inhibitor–induced DNA damage. In this chemo-naïve population, PARP inhibitor–based treatment, reduced tumor cell proliferation and modulated tumor microenvironment. After olaparib upregulation of PD-L1 and macrophages, suggests that combinatorial treatment might be beneficial. Synopsis: Our WOO study demonstrates that preoperative olaparib results in a reduction in Ki67, upregulation of PD-L1 CPS, and induction of protumor features of macrophages in HNSCC.

[1]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Recruitment of KMT2C/MLL3 to DNA Damage Sites Mediates DNA Damage Responses and Regulates PARP Inhibitor Sensitivity in Cancer , 2021, Cancer Research.

[2]  D. Rimm,et al.  PARP inhibitors in head and neck cancer: Molecular mechanisms, preclinical and clinical data. , 2021, Oral oncology.

[3]  M. Gerstein,et al.  A new tool for technical standardization of the Ki67 immunohistochemical assay , 2021, Modern Pathology.

[4]  Zachary L. Skidmore,et al.  Correction: Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Pembrolizumab in Resectable Locally Advanced, Human Papillomavirus–unrelated Head and Neck Cancer: A Multicenter, Phase II Trial , 2021, Clinical Cancer Research.

[5]  Sarah A. Boswell,et al.  Targeting immunosuppressive macrophages overcomes PARP inhibitor resistance in BRCA1-associated triple-negative breast cancer , 2020, Nature Cancer.

[6]  K. O'Byrne,et al.  PARP Inhibitors: Clinical Relevance, Mechanisms of Action and Tumor Resistance , 2020, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology.

[7]  R. Tishler,et al.  Neoadjuvant Nivolumab or Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Untreated Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Phase 2 Open-Label Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2020, JAMA oncology.

[8]  Shiaw-Yih Lin,et al.  Role of DNA repair defects in predicting immunotherapy response , 2020, Biomarker Research.

[9]  G. Koutsodontis,et al.  Direct comparison of size-dependent versus EpCAM-dependent CTC enrichment at the gene expression and DNA methylation level in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[10]  R. Fisher,et al.  Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma , 2020, Definitions.

[11]  E. Salido,et al.  ARID2 deficiency promotes tumor progression and is associated with higher sensitivity to PARP inhibition in lung cancer , 2020, bioRxiv.

[12]  Hung-Ming Wang,et al.  Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study , 2019, The Lancet.

[13]  L. Rozek,et al.  Prognostic Value of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. , 2019, JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery.

[14]  Shiang-Fu Huang,et al.  Polymorphisms of Mismatch Repair Pathway Genes Predict Clinical Outcomes in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Receiving Adjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy , 2019, Cancers.

[15]  E. Swisher,et al.  TOPACIO/Keynote-162 (NCT02657889): A phase 1/2 study of niraparib + pembrolizumab in patients (pts) with advanced triple-negative breast cancer or recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC)—Results from ROC cohort. , 2018 .

[16]  G. Coukos,et al.  T cell–induced CSF1 promotes melanoma resistance to PD1 blockade , 2018, Science Translational Medicine.

[17]  Ying Chen,et al.  The promising PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer therapy: From Olaparib to others. , 2018, Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie.

[18]  Samuel F. Bakhoum,et al.  Chromosomal instability drives metastasis through a cytosolic DNA response , 2017, Nature.

[19]  W. Golusiński,et al.  Association of DNA repair genes polymorphisms and mutations with increased risk of head and neck cancer: a review , 2017, Medical Oncology.

[20]  G. Koutsodontis,et al.  Prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression on circulating tumor cells in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma , 2017, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[21]  Robert Damoiseaux,et al.  Interferon Receptor Signaling Pathways Regulating PD-L1 and PD-L2 Expression , 2017, Cell reports.

[22]  T. Thompson,et al.  Combination Platinum-based and DNA Damage Response-targeting Cancer Therapy: Evolution and Future Directions. , 2017, Current medicinal chemistry.

[23]  Simion I. Chiosea,et al.  Randomized, placebo-controlled window trial of EGFR, Src, or combined blockade in head and neck cancer. , 2017, JCI insight.

[24]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  PARP Inhibitor Upregulates PD-L1 Expression and Enhances Cancer-Associated Immunosuppression , 2017, Clinical Cancer Research.

[25]  Peter Bankhead,et al.  QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[26]  Ignace Vergote,et al.  Niraparib Maintenance Therapy in Platinum-Sensitive, Recurrent Ovarian Cancer. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  F. Klauschen,et al.  Methylation of RAD51B, XRCC3 and other homologous recombination genes is associated with expression of immune checkpoints and an inflammatory signature in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, lung and cervix , 2016, Oncotarget.

[28]  Lauren L. Ritterhouse,et al.  Association and prognostic significance of BRCA1/2-mutation status with neoantigen load, number of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and expression of PD-1/PD-L1 in high grade serous ovarian cancer , 2016, Oncotarget.

[29]  G. Barber STING: infection, inflammation and cancer , 2015, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[30]  R. Ferris,et al.  Cetuximab ameliorates suppressive phenotypes of myeloid antigen presenting cells in head and neck cancer patients , 2015, Journal of Immunotherapy for Cancer.

[31]  Wei Yuan,et al.  DNA-Repair Defects and Olaparib in Metastatic Prostate Cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  P. Gimotty,et al.  CTLA-4 Blockade Synergizes Therapeutically with PARP Inhibition in BRCA1-Deficient Ovarian Cancer , 2015, Cancer Immunology Research.

[33]  E. Winer,et al.  Phase I trial of olaparib in combination with cisplatin for the treatment of patients with advanced breast, ovarian and other solid tumors. , 2014, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[34]  Simion I. Chiosea,et al.  Erlotinib, Erlotinib–Sulindac versus Placebo: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Window Trial in Operable Head and Neck Cancer , 2014, Clinical Cancer Research.

[35]  J. Błaszczyk,et al.  Impaired nucleotide excision repair pathway as a possible factor in pathogenesis of head and neck cancer. , 2011, Mutation research.

[36]  Karin Jirström,et al.  Leukocyte complexity predicts breast cancer survival and functionally regulates response to chemotherapy. , 2011, Cancer discovery.

[37]  Claus Scheidereit,et al.  A nuclear poly(ADP-ribose)-dependent signalosome confers DNA damage-induced IkappaB kinase activation. , 2009, Molecular cell.

[38]  J. Pignon,et al.  Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): an update on 93 randomised trials and 17,346 patients. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[39]  R. Tibbetts,et al.  Molecular Linkage Between the Kinase ATM and NF-κB Signaling in Response to Genotoxic Stimuli , 2006, Science.

[40]  Eric J. Brown,et al.  The DNA damage pathway regulates innate immune system ligands of the NKG2D receptor , 2005, Nature.

[41]  D. Rimm,et al.  Automated subcellular localization and quantification of protein expression in tissue microarrays , 2002, Nature Medicine.

[42]  Anne Floquet,et al.  Rucaparib in relapsed, platinum-sensitive high-grade ovarian carcinoma (ARIEL2 Part 1): an international, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[43]  G. Freeman,et al.  The microsatellite instable subset of colorectal cancer is a particularly good candidate for checkpoint blockade immunotherapy. , 2015, Cancer discovery.