Exact decoupling of the Dirac Hamiltonian. I. General theory.

Exact decoupling of positive- and negative-energy states in relativistic quantum chemistry is discussed in the framework of unitary transformation techniques. The obscure situation that each scheme of decoupling transformations relies on different, but very special parametrizations of the employed unitary matrices is critically analyzed. By applying the most general power series ansatz for the parametrization of the unitary matrices it is shown that all transformation protocols for decoupling the Dirac Hamiltonian have necessarily to start with an initial free-particle Foldy-Wouthuysen step. The purely numerical iteration scheme applying X-operator techniques to the Barysz-Sadlej-Snijders (BSS) Hamiltonian is compared to the analytical schemes of the Foldy-Wouthuysen (FW) and Douglas-Kroll-Hess (DKH) approaches. Relying on an illegal 1/c expansion of the Dirac Hamiltonian around the nonrelativistic limit, any higher-order FW transformation is in principle ill defined and doomed to fail, irrespective of the specific features of the external potential. It is shown that the DKH method is the only valid analytic unitary transformation scheme for the Dirac Hamiltonian. Its exact infinite-order version can be realized purely numerically by the BSS scheme, which is only able to yield matrix representations of the decoupled Hamiltonian but no analytic expressions for this operator. It is explained why a straightforward numerical iterative extension of the DKH procedure to arbitrary order employing matrix representations is not feasible within standard one-component electronic structure programs. A more sophisticated ansatz based on a symbolical evaluation of the DKH operators via a suitable parser routine is needed instead and introduced in Part II of this work.

[1]  Hess,et al.  Applicability of the no-pair equation with free-particle projection operators to atomic and molecular structure calculations. , 1985, Physical review. A, General physics.

[2]  Kimihiko Hirao,et al.  The higher-order Douglas–Kroll transformation , 2000 .

[3]  Marvin Douglas,et al.  Quantum electrodynamical corrections to the fine structure of helium , 1971 .

[4]  Sidney D. Drell,et al.  Relativistic Quantum Mechanics , 1965 .

[5]  A. Nikitin.  On exact Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation , 1998 .

[6]  Effective hamiltonians with relativistic corrections: The Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation versus the direct Pauli reduction , 1993, nucl-th/9302014.

[7]  M. Reiher,et al.  Correlated ab initio calculations of spectroscopic parameters of SnO within the framework of the higher-order generalized Douglas-Kroll transformation. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[8]  Hess,et al.  Relativistic electronic-structure calculations employing a two-component no-pair formalism with external-field projection operators. , 1986, Physical review. A, General physics.

[9]  M. Barysz.  Systematic treatment of relativistic effects accurate through arbitrarily high order in α2 , 2001 .

[10]  H. Bethe,et al.  Quantum Mechanics of One- and Two-Electron Atoms , 1957 .

[11]  Ingvar Lindgren,et al.  Diagonalisation of the Dirac Hamiltonian as a basis for a relativistic many-body procedure , 1986 .

[12]  Bernd A. Hess,et al.  Revision of the Douglas-Kroll transformation. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[13]  E. Merzbacher.  Quantum mechanics , 1961 .

[14]  Johannes Grotendorst,et al.  Modern methods and algorithms of quantum chemistry , 2000 .

[15]  K. Hirao,et al.  Recent Advances in Relativistic Molecular Theory , 2004 .

[16]  W. Kutzelnigg.  Perturbation theory of relativistic corrections , 1990 .

[17]  J. Costella,et al.  The Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation , 1995, hep-ph/9503416.

[18]  L. Ryder,et al.  Quantum Field Theory , 2001, Foundations of Modern Physics.

[19]  J. Grotendorst,et al.  Modern methods and algorithms of quantum chemistry : winterschool 21. - 25. February 2000 Forschungszentrum Jülich : proceedings / org. by John von Neumann Institute for Computing , 2000 .

[20]  Foldy–Wouthuysen transformation for relativistic particles in external fields , 2003, math-ph/0404067.

[21]  C. Wüllen.  Relation between different variants of the generalized Douglas-Kroll transformation through sixth order , 2004 .

[22]  Markus Reiher,et al.  The generalized Douglas–Kroll transformation , 2002 .

[23]  佐藤 光,et al.  C. Itzykson and J. Zuber: Quantum Field Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980, 705ぺージ, 24×17cm, 18,870円. , 1981 .

[24]  Kuo-Ho. Yang.  Gauge transformations, Foldy-Wouthuysen transformations and conservation of energy , 1982 .

[25]  Ingvar Lindgren,et al.  Atomic Many-Body Theory , 1982 .

[26]  B. Hess,et al.  Relativistic effects in heavy-element chemistry and physics , 2003 .

[27]  L. Foldy,et al.  On the Dirac Theory of Spin 1/2 Particles and Its Non-Relativistic Limit , 1950 .

[28]  W. Kutzelnigg.  Perturbation theory of relativistic corrections , 1989 .

[29]  Werner Kutzelnigg,et al.  RELATIVISTIC ONE-ELECTRON HAMILTONIANS 'FOR ELECTRONS ONLY' AND THE VARIATIONAL TREATMENT OF THE DIRAC EQUATION , 1997 .

[30]  J. G. Snijders,et al.  NONSINGULAR TWO/ONE-COMPONENT RELATIVISTIC HAMILTONIANS ACCURATE THROUGH ARBITRARY HIGH ORDER IN ALPHA 2 , 1997 .

[31]  M. Barysz,et al.  Two-component methods of relativistic quantum chemistry: from the Douglas–Kroll approximation to the exact two-component formalism , 2001 .

[32]  M. Barysz,et al.  Infinite-order two-component theory for relativistic quantum chemistry , 2002 .

[33]  B. A. Hess,et al.  Relativistic effects in heavy-element chemistry , 1997 .

[34]  B. A. Hess,et al.  The two-electron terms of the no-pair Hamiltonian , 1992 .

[35]  W. Kutzelnigg.  The relativistic many body problem in molecular theory , 1987 .

[36]  P. Dirac.  The quantum theory of the electron , 1928 .

[37]  P. Durand,et al.  Direct determination of effective Hamiltonians by wave-operator methods. I. General formalism , 1983 .