Five-month-old infants discrimination of unfamiliar languages does not accord with "rhythm class"

Young infants are sensitive to prosody, which they use to distinguish between speakers and between languages. Indeed, patterns of language discrimination have been interpreted as supporting a “rhythm class” typology, where the rhythmic nature of earliest language exposure determines the primary perceptual units of speech segmentation. In previous studies, five-month-old infants discriminated languages from different putative rhythm classes, but only within a class where one or both languages are familiar. Thus, English infants did not distinguish “syllable-timed” Italian and Spanish, nor “stresstimed” Dutch and German, but Spanish infants distinguished “syllable-timed” Catalan and Spanish. In three head-turn preference experiments, we tested whether English fivemonth-olds could discriminate – pairwise – between French, Spanish and Finnish. Although all have been categorized as “syllable-timed”, they differ in their realization and distribution of strong syllables. In each experiment, we familiarized infants to one of two languages and then exposed them to new speakers from the same or the other language. With French and Spanish, infants looked longer to the new language than the familiar one, indicating discrimination. They failed, however, to discriminate French/Finnish or Spanish/Finnish. These results strongly suggest that – rather than sensitivity to discrete classes – discrimination reflects exploitation of gradient prosodic differences.

[1]  Antoni Bertrán Prosodic Typology: on the Dychotomy between Stress. Timed and Syllable-Timed Languages , 1999 .

[2]  Sun-Ah Jun A phonetic study of stress in Korean , 1995 .

[3]  Elizabeth K. Johnson,et al.  Language Discrimination by English-Learning 5-Month-Olds: Effects of Rhythm and Familiarity , 2000 .

[4]  J. Mehler,et al.  Language discrimination by newborns: toward an understanding of the role of rhythm. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  R. M. Dauer Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalyzed. , 1983 .

[6]  Marina Nespor,et al.  48 Stress-timed vs . Syllable-timed Languages , 2010 .

[7]  N. Sebastián-Gallés,et al.  Native-language recognition abilities in 4-month-old infants from monolingual and bilingual environments , 1997, Cognition.

[8]  C. Fougeron,et al.  Realizations of accentual phrase in French intonation , 2002 .

[9]  Kari Suomi,et al.  Durational elasticity for accentual purposes in Northern Finnish , 2009, J. Phonetics.

[10]  Marina Nespor,et al.  On the rhythm parameter in phonology , 1990 .

[11]  Adena Schachner,et al.  Infant-directed speech drives social preferences in 5-month-old infants. , 2011, Developmental psychology.

[12]  F. Ramus,et al.  The psychological reality of rhythm classes: Perceptual studies , 2003 .

[13]  Sónia Frota,et al.  On the correlates of rhythmic distinctions: The European/Brazilian Portuguese case , 2001 .

[14]  D. Abercrombie,et al.  Elements of General Phonetics , 1967 .

[15]  Laurence White,et al.  Utterance-Final Lengthening Is Predictive of Infants' Discrimination of English Accents. , 2014 .

[16]  A. Cutler Segmentation problems, rhythmic solutions * , 1994 .

[17]  J. Mehler,et al.  Mora or syllable? Speech segmentation in Japanese , 1993 .

[18]  Elizabeth K. Johnson,et al.  Word Segmentation by 8-Month-Olds: When Speech Cues Count More Than Statistics , 2001 .

[19]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The syllable's differing role in the segmentation of French and English. , 1986 .

[20]  P. Ladefoged A course in phonetics , 1975 .

[21]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Neural Oscillations Carry Speech Rhythm through to Comprehension , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[22]  A. Arvaniti,et al.  The role of rhythm class, speaking rate and F0 in language discrimination , 2013 .

[23]  Laurence White,et al.  Language categorization by adults is based on sensitivity to durational cues, not rhythm class , 2012 .