Consumers' perceptions of functional foods: trust and food‐neophobia in a cross‐cultural context

Consumers' perceptions of functional foods are complicated by perceived risks and complexity that appear from growing and sometimes confusing information flow. Social trust can serve as a mean for the reduction of risk and complexity. It is thus vital to understand the sources of distrust and food-neophobia as well as coping mechanisms used by consumers to ensure food provision and safety. We discuss the results of a qualitative inquiry in the form of focus groups into consumers' perceptions of functional foods in Russia and Germany. Altogether eight focus group interviews were carried out in different parts of Russia and Germany in December–January 2012–2013. A total of 59 people participated in the discussions. Different perspectives provided by the discussions in the two countries indicate different levels of trust. Deeper culturally embedded and wider-spread distrust in formal institutions in Russia pushes consumers towards developing informal networks to ensure food provision and safety. It leads to high levels of food-neophobia as consumers perceive traditions as the most important guarantee for healthy food. On the other hand, German participants indicate a number of formal institutions that are trustworthy and through which information concerning novel and healthy attributes in foods can be communicated. We provide exploratory views on the importance of social trust in consumers' perceptions of functional foods and lay out mechanisms that consumers develop to deal with increasing risk and complexity in food choices.

[1]  Azzurra Annunziata,et al.  Consumer perception of functional foods: A conjoint analysis with probiotics☆ , 2013 .

[2]  P. Sjödén,et al.  Food and General Neophobia and their Relationship with Self-Reported Food Choice: Familial Resemblance in Swedish Families with Children of Ages 7–17 Years , 1997, Appetite.

[3]  Liisa Lähteenmäki,et al.  Food neophobia among the Finns and related responses to familiar and unfamiliar foods , 2001 .

[4]  S. Bhaskaran,et al.  Buyer beliefs, attitudes and behaviour: foods with therapeutic claims , 2002 .

[5]  E. Costell,et al.  CONSUMER ATTITUDES AND OPINIONS TOWARD FUNCTIONAL FOODS: A FOCUS GROUP STUDY , 2008 .

[6]  E. Zdravomyslova,et al.  Patients in Contemporary Russian Reproductive Health Care Institutions: Strategies of Establishing Trust , 2008 .

[7]  L. J. Frewer,et al.  Consumer acceptance of technology-based food innovations: Lessons for the future of nutrigenomics , 2007, Appetite.

[8]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Consumers’ willingness to buy functional foods. The influence of carrier, benefit and trust , 2008, Appetite.

[9]  L. Lähteenmäki,et al.  Attitudes behind consumers' willingness to use functional foods , 2004 .

[10]  Susan Miles,et al.  Investigating specific concerns about different food hazards , 2001 .

[11]  M. Pelchat,et al.  “Try it; it's good and it's good for you ”: Effects of Taste and Nutrition Information on Willingness to Try Novel Foods , 1997, Appetite.

[12]  Wim Verbeke,et al.  Innovation in traditional food products in Europe: Do sector innovation activities match consumers’ acceptance? , 2010 .

[13]  B. Halkier,et al.  Trust in food safety in Russia, Denmark and Norway , 2005 .

[14]  Gene Rowe,et al.  Perceptions of food risk management among key stakeholders: Results from a cross-European study , 2006, Appetite.

[15]  Wim Verbeke,et al.  Pathways to increase consumer trust in meat as a safe and wholesome food. , 2006, Meat science.

[16]  Marco Vassallo,et al.  Country-Wise Differences in Perception of Health-Related Messages in Cereal-Based Food Products , 2010 .

[17]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Influence of nutritional knowledge on perceived healthiness and willingness to try functional foods , 2008, Appetite.

[18]  Víctor Falguera,et al.  An integrated approach to current trends in food consumption: Moving toward functional and organic products? , 2012 .

[19]  István Siró,et al.  Functional food. Product development, marketing and consumer acceptance—A review , 2008, Appetite.

[20]  Vladimir Shlapentokh.  Trust in public institutions in Russia: The lowest in the world , 2006 .

[21]  A. Fischer,et al.  Consumer evaluations of food risk management in Russia , 2010 .

[22]  J. Bartels,et al.  Which perceived characteristics make product innovations appealing to the consumer? A study on the acceptance of fruit innovations using cross-cultural consumer segmentation , 2011, Appetite.

[23]  L. Frewer,et al.  Russian consumers’ motives for food choice , 2009, Appetite.

[24]  Joachim Scholderer,et al.  Consumer acceptance of functional foods: issues for the future , 2003 .

[25]  P. Abbott,et al.  Trust, confidence and social environment in post-communist societies , 2006 .

[26]  M. Niva.  ‘All foods affect health’: Understandings of functional foods and healthy eating among health-oriented Finns , 2007, Appetite.

[27]  K. White,et al.  Willingness to trial functional foods and vitamin supplements: the role of attitudes, subjective norms, and dread of risks , 2010 .

[28]  M. Siegrist.  The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[29]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Influence of gender, age and motives underlying food choice on perceived healthiness and willingness to try functional foods , 2007, Appetite.

[30]  P. Pliner,et al.  Increasing Willingness to Taste Novel Foods: Effects of Nutrition and Taste Information , 1997, Appetite.

[31]  H. P. Peters,et al.  Culture and technological innovation: impact of institutional trust and appreciation of nature on attitudes towards food biotechnology in the USA and Germany , 2007 .