Acetylcholine receptor channels in Xenopus myocyte culture; brief openings, brief closures and slow desensitization.

1. Single acetylcholine (ACh) receptor channel currents were analysed in Xenopus myocyte culture. Channel events activated by ACh were recorded using the cell‐attached patch clamp technique at low temperatures (11.2‐15.8 degrees C) and at 100 mV hyperpolarization over the average resting membrane potential of ‐75 mV. There were two types of channels, low‐ and high‐conductance channels, as reported previously, with unitary current amplitudes 4.7 +/‐ 0.4 pA (mean +/‐ S.D., n = 17) and 6.6 +/‐ 1.2 pA (n = 14), respectively. 2. At low concentrations of ACh many brief openings (less than 1 ms in duration) were observed. Almost all of them occurred in isolation. The mean open time, which was not dependent on ACh concentration, was 63.1 +/‐ 18.1 microseconds (n = 15) for the low‐conductance channel and 80.3 +/‐ 18.7 microseconds (n = 2) for the high‐conductance channel. 3. Brief openings were frequently observed at 20 nM‐ACh, at which concentration the frequency of longer openings (longer than 1 ms) was rare. The frequency of brief openings reached maximum at 50 nM‐ACh and declined at high concentrations. The occurrence ratio between the long and brief openings increased linearly with ACh concentration. This finding suggests strongly that the brief openings are due to singly liganded receptor channels, since the long openings are most likely due to doubly liganded receptor channels. 4. A burst of openings was defined as a group of openings separated by brief closures (gaps) lasting less than 1 ms. The main component in the closed time histogram had a time constant of 25.0 +/‐ 5.1 microseconds (n = 16) for the low‐conductance channel and 32.0 +/‐ 10.2 microseconds (n = 10) for the high‐conductance channel. These values were not dependent on ACh concentration. The number of gaps per burst was 2.22 +/‐ 0.69 (n = 16) for the low‐conductance channel and 0.85 +/‐ 0.23 (n = 9) for the high‐conductance channel. The former is significantly greater than the latter. 5. During the recording from a single patch, the frequency of low‐conductance channel events declined with time at all ACh concentrations, and the rate of decline was slower in the high‐conductance channel in the same patch. The rate of decline was dependent linearly on the ACh concentration. It is most likely that this decline is due to desensitization of the receptors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

[1]  J. Rohrbough,et al.  Changes in kinetics of acetylcholine receptor channels after initial expression in Xenopus myocyte culture. , 1990, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  R. Kullberg,et al.  In vivo development of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor channels in Xenopus myotomal muscle , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  V. E. Dionne Two types of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor channels at slow fibre end‐plates of the garter snake. , 1989, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  R. Leonard,et al.  Early development of two types of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[5]  M B Jackson,et al.  Dependence of acetylcholine receptor channel kinetics on agonist concentration in cultured mouse muscle fibres. , 1988, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  A. Auerbach,et al.  Activation of the primary kinetic modes of large‐ and small‐conductance cholinergic ion channels in Xenopus myocytes. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  Y. Igusa,et al.  Two types of acetylcholine receptor channels in developing Xenopus muscle cells in culture: further kinetic analyses. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  M B Jackson,et al.  Kinetics of unliganded acetylcholine receptor channel gating. , 1986, Biophysical journal.

[9]  B Sakmann,et al.  Fast events in single‐channel currents activated by acetylcholine and its analogues at the frog muscle end‐plate. , 1985, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  Y. Nakajima,et al.  Functional properties of newly inserted acetylcholine receptors in embryonic Xenopus muscle cells. , 1985, Brain research.

[11]  P. Brehm,et al.  Acetylcholine receptor channel properties during development of Xenopus muscle cells in culture. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  P. Brehm,et al.  Properties of non‐junctional acetylcholine receptor channels on innervated muscle of Xenopus laevis. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  M B Jackson,et al.  Successive openings of the same acetylcholine receptor channel are correlated in open time. , 1983, Biophysical journal.

[14]  J. Patrick,et al.  Metabolism of acetylcholine receptors on embryonic amphibian muscle , 1983, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  B. Sakmann,et al.  Fluctuations in the microsecond time range of the current through single acetylcholine receptor ion channels , 1981, Nature.

[16]  P. Brehm,et al.  Nonjunctional acetylcholine receptor channel open time decreases during development of Xenopus muscle , 1981, Nature.

[17]  R. Gruener,et al.  Changes in synaptic potential properties during acetylcholine receptor accumulation and neurospecific interactions in Xenopus nerve-muscle cell culture. , 1980, Developmental biology.

[18]  M. Anderson,et al.  Effects of innervation on the distribution of acetylcholine receptors on cultured muscle cells. , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  J. Steinbach,et al.  Acetylcholine receptor activation by a site‐selective ligand: nature of brief open and closed states in BC3H‐1 cells. , 1986, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  J. Steinbach,et al.  Activation of acetylcholine receptors on clonal mammalian BC3H‐1 cells by low concentrations of agonist. , 1986, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  J. Steinbach,et al.  Activation of a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. , 1984, Biophysical journal.

[22]  Fred J. Sigworth,et al.  Fitting and Statistical Analysis of Single-Channel Records , 1983 .

[23]  A. Trautmann,et al.  Desensitization at the frog neuromuscular junction: a biphasic process , 1982, The Journal of physiology.