Face Recognition: A Comparison of Appearance-Based Approaches

We investigate the effect of image processing techniques when applied as a pre-processing step to three methods of face recognition: the direct correlation method, the eigenface method and fisherface method. Effectiveness is evaluated by comparing false acceptance rates, false rejection rates and equal error rates calculated from over 250,000 verification operations on a large test set of facial images, which present typical difficulties when attempting recognition, such as strong variations in lighting conditions and changes in facial expression. We identify some key advantages and determine the best image processing technique for each face recognition method.

[1]  Aleix M. Martinez,et al.  The AR face database , 1998 .

[2]  M. Turk,et al.  Eigenfaces for Recognition , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  Gerald Schaefer,et al.  Hue that is invariant to brightness and gamma , 2001, BMVC.

[4]  Jim Austin,et al.  Evaluation of image preprocessing techniques for eigenface-based face recognition , 2002, Other Conferences.

[5]  Bernt Schiele,et al.  Comprehensive Colour Image Normalization , 1998, ECCV.

[6]  Gian Luca Marcialis,et al.  Fusion of LDA and PCA for Face Recognition , 2002 .

[7]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces: Recognition Using Class Specific Linear Projection , 1996, ECCV.

[8]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Face recognition using eigenfaces , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[9]  Roberto Brunelli,et al.  Face Recognition: Features Versus Templates , 1993, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  T. Heseltine Evaluation of Image Pre-processing Techniques for Eigenface Based Face Recognition , 2002 .