Parametric Study of Peripheral Nozzle Configurations for Supersonic Retropropulsion

Field, CA, 94035 With sample-return and manned missions on the horizon for Mars exploration, the ability to decelerate high-mass systems to the planet’s surface has become a research priority. This paper explores the use of supersonic retropropulsion, the application of jets facing into the freestream, as a means of achieving drag augmentation. Numerical studies of retropropulsion ows were conducted using a Cartesian Euler solver with adjoint-driven mesh renement. After rst validating this simulation tool with existing experimental data, a series of three broad parametric studies comprising 181 total runs was conducted using tri- and quad-nozzle capsule congurations. These studies chronicle the eects of nozzle location, orientation, and jet strength over Mach numbers from 2 to 8 and angles of attack ranging from 5 to 10 . Although many simulations in these studies actually produced negative drag augmentation, some simulations displayed local overpressures 60% higher than that possible behind a normal shock and produced drag augmentation on the order of 20%. Examination of these cases leads to the development of an aerodynamic model for drag augmentation in which the retrojets are viewed as oblique shock generators. Flow approaching the capsule face is decelerated and compressed by multiple oblique shocks. By avoiding the massive stagnation pressure losses associated with the bow shock in typical entry systems, this approach achieves signicant overpressure on the capsule face and strong drag amplication. With a fundamental physical mechanism for drag augmentation identied, follow-on studies are planned to exploit this feature and to understand its impact on potential entry trajectories and delivered mass limits for future Mars missions.

[1]  Gopalan Jagadeesh,et al.  Experimental Investigations of Hypersonic Flow over Highly Blunted Cones with Aerospikes , 2003 .

[2]  M. Berger,et al.  Robust and efficient Cartesian mesh generation for component-based geometry , 1998 .

[3]  J. W. Keyes,et al.  Effect of forward-facing jets on aerodynamic characteristics of blunt configurations at Mach 6. , 1967 .

[4]  Robert D. Braun,et al.  Performance Characterization of Supersonic Retropropulsion for Application to High Mass Mars Entry, Descent, and Landing , 2009 .

[5]  Robert D. Braun,et al.  High Mass Mars Entry, Descent, and Landing Architecture Assessment , 2009 .

[6]  Jackson R Stalder,et al.  A Method of Reducing Heat Transfer to Blunt Bodies by Air Injection , 1956 .

[7]  Stuart E. Rogers,et al.  Effects of Jet-Interaction on Pitch Control of a Launch Abort Vehicle , 2008 .

[8]  M. Berger,et al.  Analysis of Slope Limiters on Irregular Grids , 2005 .

[9]  Scott M. Murman,et al.  Automated Parameter Studies Using a Cartesian Method , 2004 .

[10]  R. Manning,et al.  Mars exploration entry, descent and landing challenges , 2006, 2006 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[11]  Scott M. Murman,et al.  Numerical simulation of rolling-airframes using a multi-level cartesian method , 2002 .

[12]  Mathias Wintzer,et al.  Adjoint-based adaptive mesh refinement for sonic boom prediction , 2008 .

[13]  P. J. Finley,et al.  The flow of a jet from a body opposing a supersonic free stream , 1966, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[14]  Scott M. Murman,et al.  Performance of a new CFD flow solver using a hybrid programming paradigm , 2005, J. Parallel Distributed Comput..

[15]  S. Hoffman,et al.  Human exploration of Mars, Design Reference Architecture 5.0 , 2010, 2010 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[16]  J. Shang Validation of Plasma Injection for Hypersonic Blunt-Body Drag Reduction , 2003 .

[17]  Michael J. Aftosmis,et al.  Exploring Discretization Error in Simulation-Based Aerodynamic Databases , 2010 .

[18]  Michael J. Aftosmis,et al.  Computations of Aerodynamic Performance Databases Using Output-Based Refinement , 2009 .

[19]  Michael J. Aftosmis,et al.  Adjoint Error Estimation and Adaptive Refinement for Embedded-Boundary Cartesian Meshes , 2007 .

[20]  Shigeru Aso,et al.  Numerical study of thermal protection system by opposing jet , 2005 .

[21]  Scott M. Murman,et al.  Applications of Space-Filling-Curves to Cartesian Methods for CFD , 2004 .

[22]  Mathias Wintzer,et al.  Adjoint-Based Adaptive Mesh Refinement for Complex Geometries , 2008 .

[23]  Mc Ghee Effects of a retronozzle located at the apex of a 140 deg blunt cone at Mach numbers of 3.00, 4.50, and 6.00 , 1971 .

[24]  Robert D. Braun,et al.  Survey of Supersonic Retropropulsion Technology for Mars Entry, Descent, and Landing , 2009 .

[25]  Ten-See Wang,et al.  Dynamics of Shock Dispersion and Interactions in Supersonic Freestreams with Counterflowing Jets , 2009 .

[26]  D. Venditti,et al.  Grid adaptation for functional outputs: application to two-dimensional inviscid flows , 2002 .

[27]  J.R. Cruz,et al.  A Survey of Supersonic Retropropulsion Technology for Mars Entry, Descent, and Landing , 2008, 2008 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[28]  David J. Romeo,et al.  Flow field for sonic jet exhausting counter to a hypersonic mainstream , 1965 .

[29]  P. O. Jarvinen,et al.  The aerodynamic characteristics of large angled cones with retrorockets , 1970 .

[30]  E. S. Love,et al.  Some studies of axisymmetric free jets exhausting from sonic and supersonic nozzles into still air and into supersonic streams , 1955 .

[31]  P. O. Jarvinen,et al.  The effects of retrorockets on the aerodynamic characteristics of conical aeroshell planetary entry vehicles , 1970 .

[32]  Harold E. Nelson,et al.  Hypersonic Drag and Heat-Transfer Reduction Using a Forward-Facing Jet , 2001 .

[33]  Gediminas Adomavicius,et al.  A Parallel Multilevel Method for Adaptively Refined Cartesian Grids with Embedded Boundaries , 2000 .

[34]  Scott M. Murman,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Rolling Airframes Using a Multilevel Cartesian Method , 2004 .

[35]  Gary Cheng,et al.  Effect of Counterflow Jet on a Supersonic Reentry Capsule , 2006 .

[36]  Michael J. Aftosmis,et al.  Adjoint sensitivity computations for an embedded-boundary Cartesian mesh method , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..