Weber's illusion and body shape: anisotropy of tactile size perception on the hand.

The perceived distance between touches on a single skin surface is larger on regions of high tactile sensitivity than those with lower acuity, an effect known as Weber's illusion. This illusion suggests that tactile size perception involves a representation of the perceived size of body parts preserving characteristics of the somatosensory homunculus. Here, we investigated how body shape is coded within this representation by comparing tactile distances presented in different orientations on the hand. Participants judged which of two tactile distances on the dorsum of their left hand felt larger. One distance was aligned with the proximodistal axis (along the hand), the other with the mediolateral axis (across the hand). Across distances were consistently perceived as larger than along ones. A second experiment showed that this effect is specific to the hairy skin of the hand dorsum and does not occur on glabrous skin of the palm. A third experiment demonstrated that this bias reflects orientation on the hand surface, rather than an eye- or torso-centered reference frame. These results mirror known orientational anisotropies of both tactile acuity and of tactile receptive fields (RFs) of cortical neurons. We suggest that the dorsum of the hand is implicitly represented as wider than it actually is and that the shape of tactile RFs may partly explain distortions of mental body representations.

[1]  Patrick Haggard,et al.  An implicit body representation underlying human position sense , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  C. Spence,et al.  Prior-entry: A review , 2010, Consciousness and Cognition.

[3]  P. Haggard,et al.  More than skin deep: Body representation beyond primary somatosensory cortex , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  D. Goldreich,et al.  Diminutive Digits Discern Delicate Details: Fingertip Size and the Sex Difference in Tactile Spatial Acuity , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Ellen Poliakoff,et al.  Tactile spatial acuity varies with site and axis in the human upper limb , 2008, Neuroscience Letters.

[6]  C. Benton,et al.  Psychophysics reveals a right hemispheric contribution to body image distortions in women but not men , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  Space perception and body morphology: extent of near space scales with arm length , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  S. Hsiao,et al.  Representation of object size in the somatosensory system. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Gregory O. Gibson,et al.  Tactile spatial sensitivity and anisotropy , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  P. Haggard,et al.  Bodily Illusions Modulate Tactile Perception , 2005, Current Biology.

[11]  P. Brown,et al.  From innervation density to tactile acuity 1. Spatial representation , 2004, Brain Research.

[12]  P. Haggard,et al.  Keeping the world a constant size: object constancy in human touch , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  H. Burton,et al.  Quantitative measurements of receptive field changes during antagonism of GABAergic transmission in primary somatosensory cortex of cats , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  D. Bavelier,et al.  Components of visual prior entry , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  James J DiCarlo,et al.  Receptive field structure in cortical area 3b of the alert monkey , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[16]  A. Goodwin,et al.  Tactile discrimination of gaps by slowly adapting afferents: effects of population parameters and anisotropy in the fingerpad. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  R M Müri,et al.  Beyond re-membering: phantom sensations of congenitally absent limbs. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  K. O. Johnson,et al.  SA1 and RA receptive fields, response variability, and population responses mapped with a probe array. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  S. Gandevia,et al.  Perceptual distortions of the human body image produced by local anaesthesia, pain and cutaneous stimulation , 1999, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  R. Cholewiak space, and time , 1999 .

[21]  J. DiCarlo,et al.  Structure of Receptive Fields in Area 3b of Primary Somatosensory Cortex in the Alert Monkey , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  D. J. Murray,et al.  E.H. Weber on the Tactile Senses , 2018 .

[23]  A B Vallbo,et al.  Receptive field characteristics of tactile units with myelinated afferents in hairy skin of human subjects. , 1995, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  Richard Held,et al.  Growth in head size during infancy: Implications for sound localization. , 1988 .

[25]  M. Diamond,et al.  Evidence for a mosaic representation of the body surface in area 3b of the somatic cortex of cat. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  W. Warren,et al.  Visual guidance of walking through apertures: body-scaled information for affordances. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  P B Brown,et al.  Two-point discriminability: relation to properties of the somatosensory system. , 1984, Somatosensory research.

[28]  B. Green The perception of distance and location for dual tactile pressures , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  R. Johansson,et al.  Spatial properties of the population of mechanoreceptive units in the glabrous skin of the human hand , 1980, Brain Research.

[30]  P B Brown,et al.  Parametric studies of dorsal horn neurons responding to tactile stimulation. , 1975, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  J. Ho,et al.  Influence of shape of receptor organ on the horizontal-vertical illusion in passive touch. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[32]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  R. C. Oldfield THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .

[34]  P. Rudomín,et al.  PERIPHERAL RECEPTIVE FIELDS OF NEURONS IN THE CAT'S CEREBRAL CORTEX , 1961 .

[35]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  Some aspects of the functional organization of the cortex of the postcentral gyrus of the monkey: a correlation of findings obtained in a single unit analysis with cytoarchitecture. , 1959, Bulletin of the Johns Hopkins Hospital.

[36]  W. Penfield,et al.  SOMATIC MOTOR AND SENSORY REPRESENTATION IN THE CEREBRAL CORTEX OF MAN AS STUDIED BY ELECTRICAL STIMULATION , 1937 .