Rapid, ultra-sensitive detection of gas phase elemental mercury under atmospheric conditions using sequential two-photon laser induced fluorescence.

We have examined the sensitivity of sequential two photon laser induced fluorescence (LIF) detection of elemental mercury, Hg(0) in the gas phase. The most sensitive approach involves an initial laser excitation of the 6(3)P1-6(1)S0 transition at 253.7 nm, followed by excitation with a second laser to the 7(1)S0 level. Blue shifted fluorescence is observed on the 6(1)P1-6(1)S0 transition at 184.9 nm. The excitation scheme, involving sequential excitation of two atomic transitions, followed by detection of the emission from a third is extremely specific and precludes detection of anything other than atomic mercury. Using our 10 Hz laser system we have achieved a detection sensitivity of 0.1 ng m(-3) at a sampling rate of 0.1 Hz, i.e. averaging 100 laser shots at a pressure of one atmosphere in air. At low concentrations we sampled simultaneously with an automated mercury analyzer (Tekran 2537A), to ensure accuracy. We have examined the linearity of the technique, generating flows containing mercury concentrations between 1 and 10,000 ng m(-3) using a permeation tube and dynamic dilution, but relying on the concentrations given by the Tekran at low levels and the concentration calculated from dilution at high levels. We find that the detection is linear over the five orders of magnitude that we were able to vary the concentration. Our measured detection limits in He and Ar are much lower as these gases are inefficient fluorescence quenchers.

[1]  T. Meyers,et al.  Air/surface exchange of mercury vapor over forests-the need for a reassessment of continental biogenic emissions , 1998 .

[2]  J. Michael,et al.  Absolute quenching cross sections of Hg(3P1) with various molecules , 1974 .

[3]  S. Lindberg Mercury partitioning in a power plant plume and its influence on atmospheric removal mechanisms , 1980 .

[4]  F. Slemr,et al.  International field intercomparison measurements of atmospheric mercury species at Mace Head, Ireland , 1999 .

[5]  L. Poissant,et al.  Water-air and soil-air exchange rate of total gaseous mercury measured at background sites , 1998 .

[6]  J. Maya Ultraviolet absorption cross sections of HgI2, HgBr2, and tin (II) halide vapors , 1977 .

[7]  H Edner,et al.  Atmospheric atomic mercury monitoring using differential absorption lidar techniques. , 1989, Applied optics.

[8]  S. Pehkonen,et al.  The chemistry of atmospheric mercury: a review , 1999 .

[9]  S. Lindberg,et al.  Assessing the contribution of natural sources to the global mercury cycle: The importance of intercomparing dynamic flux measurements , 2000, Fresenius' journal of analytical chemistry.

[10]  L. Barrie,et al.  Arctic springtime depletion of mercury , 1998, Nature.

[11]  M. Linne,et al.  Development of a cavity ringdown laser absorption spectrometer for detection of trace levels of mercury. , 2000, Applied optics.

[12]  G. P. Miller,et al.  Determination of elemental mercury by cavity ringdown spectrometry , 2000 .

[13]  J. Winefordner,et al.  Two-step laser excited atomic fluorescence spectrometry determination of mercury , 1993 .

[14]  William F. Fitzgerald,et al.  Is mercury increasing in the atmosphere? The need for an atmospheric mercury network (AMNET) , 1995 .