Innovation by Teams in Shanghai, China: Cooperative Goals for Group Confidence and Persistence

Organizations increasingly ask teams to stimulate innovation but research is needed to identify the conditions when teams have the confidence and persistence to innovate successfully. Using the concepts of cooperation, competition, group potency and initiative, this study proposes that relationships where team members believe that their goals are cooperative in that one person's goal attainment helps others reach their goals lay the foundation for innovation. Specifically, cooperative goals convince team members that they have the group potency to complete a range of tasks and the initiative to persist to overcome obstacles and innovate. In contrast, competitive, negatively related goals and independent, unrelated goals are hypothesized to undermine confidence, persistence and innovation. Group members from 101 teams from various organizations in Shanghai, China, completed a survey with measures of cooperative, competitive and independent goals, group potency, and initiative; their project leader completed the measure of innovation. Structural equation analysis supports the theoretical framework that cooperative goals help group members develop the confidence of group potency and the initiative to persist to accomplish tasks and innovate. These results suggest that cooperative goals and group potency and initiative are important conditions that help teams innovate for organizations and thereby specify conditions that can help groups realize their potential to achieve innovation for organizations.

[1]  B. Nijstad,et al.  The routinization of innovation research: A constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science , 2004 .

[2]  G. W. Hill.  Group versus individual performance: are n + 1 heads better than one?" psychological bulletin , 1982 .

[3]  A. Pescosolido,et al.  Informal Leaders and the Development of Group Efficacy , 2001 .

[4]  R. Kramer,et al.  Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research , 1995 .

[5]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .

[6]  B. Major,et al.  Perceived social support, self-efficacy, and adjustment to abortion. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  Richard H. Price,et al.  Self-efficacy changes in groups: effects of diversity, leadership, and group climate , 2003 .

[8]  Robert r. Taylor,et al.  Consequences of Gainsharing , 1994 .

[9]  Kwok Leung,et al.  Negotiation and reward allocations across cultures. , 1997 .

[10]  M. Stanne,et al.  Does competition enhance or inhibit motor performance: a meta-analysis. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey. , 2002, The American psychologist.

[12]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: User's Reference Guide , 1997 .

[13]  Gregory E. Prussia,et al.  A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social-cognitive theory. , 1996 .

[14]  D. Tjosvold,et al.  Interdependence and Controversy in Group Decision Making: Antecedents to Effective Self-Managing Teams. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[15]  David A. Hofmann,et al.  Job Perception–Job Satisfaction Relations: An Empirical Comparison of Three Competing Theories , 1993 .

[16]  Gerald E. Ledford,et al.  The Effectiveness of Self-Managing Teams: A Quasi-Experiment , 1994 .

[17]  M. Hoegl,et al.  Team Reflexivity in Innovative Projects , 2006 .

[18]  Louis Y.Y. Lu,et al.  R&D in China: An Empirical Study of Taiwanese it Companies , 2004 .

[19]  P. Earley.  Self or group? Cultural effects of training on self-efficacy and performance. , 1994 .

[20]  Gyewan Moon,et al.  Business ideologies and perceived breach of contract during downsizing: the role of the ideology of employee self-reliance , 2003 .

[21]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. , 1981 .

[22]  Justin Tan,et al.  Innovation and Risk-Taking in a Transitional Economy: A Comparative Study of Chinese Managers and Entrepreneurs , 2001 .

[23]  Donald C. Hambrick,et al.  Building Effective International Joint Venture Leadership Teams in China , 1999 .

[24]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research , 1989 .

[25]  D. Tjosvold,et al.  Goal Interdependence and Applying Abilities for Team In-Role and Extra-Role Performance in China. , 2004 .

[26]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[27]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[28]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  The Relationship of Team Goals, Incentives, and Efficacy to Strategic Risk, Tactical Implementation, and Performance , 2001 .

[29]  P. Bliese.  Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. , 2000 .

[30]  Paul E. Spector.  A Consideration of the Validity and Meaning of Self-Report Measures of Job Conditions , 1992 .

[31]  R. Brislin.  Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research , 1970 .

[32]  G. Hofstede.  Cultural constraints in management theories , 1993 .

[33]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  The nature and effects of method variance in organizational research , 1995 .

[34]  Kate D. Abel,et al.  Practices that Support Team Learning and Their Impact on Speed to Market and New Product Success , 1999 .

[35]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[36]  J. Nunnally.  Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[37]  James C. Anderson,et al.  An approach for confirmatory measurement and structural equation modeling of organizational properties , 1987 .

[38]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Separating individual and group effects , 1985 .

[39]  Kate D. Abel,et al.  Practices that Support Team Learning and Their Impact on Speed to Market and New Product Success , 1999 .

[40]  P. Swingle.  The resolution of conflict. , 1989 .

[41]  Kipling D. Williams,et al.  PROCESSES Social Loafing: A Meta-Analytic Review and Theoretical Integration , 2022 .

[42]  Terri L. Griffith,et al.  Groups and Productivity; Analyzing the Effectiveness of Self-Managing Teams , 1988 .

[43]  T. Little,et al.  To Parcel or Not to Parcel: Exploring the Question, Weighing the Merits , 2002 .

[44]  Christian Zeller,et al.  Project Teams as Means of Restructuring Research and Development in the Pharmaceutical Industry , 2002 .

[45]  Paul R. Yost,et al.  Potency in groups: articulating a construct. , 1993, The British journal of social psychology.

[46]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[47]  Holly Arrow,et al.  Small Groups as Complex Systems: Formation, Coordination, Development, and Adaptation , 2000 .

[48]  N. Anderson,et al.  Innovation in top management teams , 1996 .

[49]  M. Nicholson.  The Resolution of Conflict , 1967 .

[50]  Kara A. Incalcaterra,et al.  A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[51]  M. Audrey Korsgaard,et al.  The Antecedents and Consequences of Group Potency: A Longitudinal Investigation of Newly Formed Work Groups , 2002 .

[52]  Philip Bobko,et al.  Self-efficacy beliefs: Comparison of five measures. , 1994 .

[53]  R. Golembiewski.  Handbook of Organizational Behavior , 2001 .

[54]  Michael D. Ensley,et al.  A reciprocal and longitudinal investigation of the innovation process: the central role of shared vision in product and process innovation teams (PPITs) , 2004 .

[55]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[56]  L. James.  Aggregation Bias in Estimates of Perceptual Agreement. , 1982 .

[57]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  TEAMS EMBEDDED IN ORGANIZATIONS : SOME IMPLICATIONS , 1999 .

[58]  Leon Mann,et al.  The Innovation Imperative , 2001 .

[59]  Ramon J. Aldag,et al.  Beyond fiasco: A reappraisal of the groupthink phenomenon and a new model of group decision processes. , 1993 .

[60]  M. West.  Sparkling Fountains or Stagnant Ponds: An Integrative Model of Creativity and Innovation Implementation in Work Groups , 2002 .

[61]  J. George,et al.  Understanding prosocial behavior, sales performance, and turnover: A group-level analysis in a service context. , 1990 .

[62]  J. McGrath.  A view of group composition through a group-theoretic lens. , 1998 .

[63]  B. Little,et al.  The Relationship between Collective Efficacy and Performance in Manufacturing Work Teams , 1997 .

[64]  A. Bandura.  Perceived Self-Efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning , 1993, Educational Psychologist.

[65]  M. Frese,et al.  Innovation is not enough: climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance , 2003 .

[66]  W. J. Bigoness,et al.  Leadership and Innovation among Teams , 1997 .

[67]  George B. Graen,et al.  Guanxi and professional leadership in contemporary Sino-American joint ventures in mainland China , 1997 .

[68]  John J. Sosik,et al.  Effects of leadership style and anonymity on group potency and effectiveness in a group decision support system environment. , 1997 .

[69]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  Further evidence for the discriminant validity of measures of organizational commitment, job involvement, and job satisfaction. , 1991 .

[70]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Trust And Distrust: New Relationships and Realities , 1998 .