Fast contrast-enhanced MR whole-brain venography

Our aim was to assess the value of a new fast contrast-enhanced MR venography (CE-MRV) sequence in the investigation of normal and diseased cerebral veins. Conventional time-of-flight (TOF) MRV is time consuming, with imaging for a single sequence taking many minutes. MRI was performed with a clinical 1.5-T scanner; conventional TOF MRV followed by CE-MRV was performed using a modified 3D first-pass MR angiography sequence. Ten control subjects without cerebral pathology were studied as well as ten patients with cerebral venous thrombosis for a total of 20 studies with both sequences. CE-MRV was able to provide a set of complete MRV images in a significantly shorter time than conventional MRV sequencing could. The field of view also provided greater coverage of the vessels of the head and neck. CE-MRV also provided more extensive small vein detail and provided a better demonstration of intraluminal defects, despite a slightly lower resolution. Both methods were equally suited for the demonstration of venous thrombosis and demonstrated all cases equally well; however, CE-MRV provided more detailed information by showing partially obstructed sinuses and by showing better the presence of cortical collateral venous drainage.

[1]  R R Edelman,et al.  Cerebral venography with MR. , 1991, Radiology.

[2]  A. Villringer,et al.  Dural sinus thrombosis: value of venous MR angiography for diagnosis and follow-up. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  M. van Buchem,et al.  MR angiography of the intracranial venous system. , 2000, Radiology.

[4]  A. Villringer,et al.  Pathophysiological aspects of cerebral sinus venous thrombosis (SVT). , 1994, Journal of neuroradiology. Journal de neuroradiologie.

[5]  P. Purdy,et al.  Treatment of dural sinus thrombosis using selective catheterization and urokinase , 1995, Annals of neurology.

[6]  R. Alberico,et al.  Cerebral venography: comparison of CT and MR projection venography. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  E. T. Tali,et al.  Venous sinus occlusive disease: MR findings. , 1994, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[8]  G. Krol,et al.  Dural sinus thrombosis: verification with spin-echo techniques. , 1988, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[9]  J. Chiras,et al.  Cerebral venous thrombosis--a review of 38 cases. , 1985, Stroke.

[10]  R. Alberico,et al.  Cerebral CT venography. , 1996, Radiology.

[11]  F. Buonanno,et al.  Computed cranial tomographic findings in cerebral sinovenous occlusion. , 1978, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[12]  R. Higashida,et al.  Acute thrombosis of the intracranial dural sinus: direct thrombolytic treatment. , 1992, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[13]  T. D. de Jaegere,et al.  Three-dimensional phase contrast MR cerebral venography with zero filling interpolation in the slice encoding direction. , 1999, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[14]  L Remonda,et al.  Carotid artery stenosis, occlusion, and pseudo-occlusion: first-pass, gadolinium-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography--preliminary study. , 1998, Radiology.

[15]  P Schmalbrock,et al.  Normal venous anatomy of the brain: demonstration with gadopentetate dimeglumine in enhanced 3-D MR angiography. , 1990, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  R. Grossman,et al.  High field MR imaging of cerebral venous thrombosis. , 1986, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[17]  V. Haughton,et al.  Gradient recalled echo MR imaging of superior sagittal sinus occlusion , 2004, Neuroradiology.

[18]  L. Kappelle,et al.  Thunderclap headache as first symptom of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis , 1996, The Lancet.

[19]  D. Dormont,et al.  Gadolinium-enhanced MR of chronic dural sinus thrombosis. , 1995, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[20]  J. Meder,et al.  CT in cerebral thrombophlebitis , 2004, Neuroradiology.

[21]  V. Biousse,et al.  Cerebral Venous Thrombosis. , 1999, Current treatment options in neurology.

[22]  K. Kraft,et al.  MRI of intracranial sinovenous thrombosis: the role of phase imaging. , 1990, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[23]  D. Yousem,et al.  Hyperintense thrombus on GRASS MR images: potential pitfall in flow evaluation. , 1990, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[24]  D. A. Bell,et al.  Thrombosis of the deep venous drainage of the brain in adults. Analysis of seven cases with review of the literature. , 1995, Archives of neurology.

[25]  M. Bousser,et al.  Cerebral venous thrombosis , 1997, Current treatment options in neurology.

[26]  R. D. de Haan,et al.  Clinical features and prognostic factors of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in a prospective series of 59 patients. For The Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis Study Group. , 2001, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[27]  F. Woimant,et al.  Deep cerebral venous thrombosis: imaging in eight cases , 1999, Neuroradiology.

[28]  D Saloner,et al.  Artifacts associated with MR neuroangiography. , 1992, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[29]  H. Büller,et al.  Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of anticoagulant treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin for cerebral sinus thrombosis. , 1999, Stroke.