A four stage approach for ontology-based health information system design

OBJECTIVE To describe and illustrate a four stage methodological approach to capture user knowledge in a biomedical domain area, use that knowledge to design an ontology, and then implement and evaluate the ontology as a health information system (HIS). METHODS AND MATERIALS A hybrid participatory design-grounded theory (GT-PD) method was used to obtain data and code them for ontology development. Prototyping was used to implement the ontology as a computer-based tool. Usability testing evaluated the computer-based tool. RESULTS An empirically derived domain ontology and set of three problem-solving approaches were developed as a formalized model of the concepts and categories from the GT coding. The ontology and problem-solving approaches were used to design and implement a HIS that tested favorably in usability testing. CONCLUSIONS The four stage approach illustrated in this paper is useful for designing and implementing an ontology as the basis for a HIS. The approach extends existing ontology development methodologies by providing an empirical basis for theory incorporated into ontology design.

[1]  Frederico T. Fonseca,et al.  The double role of ontologies in information science research: Research Articles , 2007 .

[2]  Barry Smith,et al.  Introduction: International Medical Informatics Association Working Group 6 and the 2005 Rome Conference , 2006, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[3]  Randy H. Katz,et al.  Toward a unified framework for version modeling in engineering databases , 1990, CSUR.

[4]  Ron Weber,et al.  Editor's comment: still desperately seeking the IT artifact , 2003 .

[5]  M. Ashburner,et al.  The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[6]  Craig E. Kuziemsky,et al.  A grounded theory guided approach to palliative care systems design , 2007, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[7]  John Mylopoulos,et al.  Partitioning Information Bases with Contexts , 1995, CoopIS.

[8]  Olivier Bodenreider,et al.  Law and order: Assessing and enforcing compliance with ontological modeling principles in the Foundational Model of Anatomy , 2006, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[9]  M Berg,et al.  The Search for Synergy: Interrelating Medical Work and Patient Care Information Systems , 2003, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[10]  Wendy,et al.  Medical care of the dying , 2006 .

[11]  Mariano Fernández-López,et al.  Ontological Engineering , 2003, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[12]  B Marshall,et al.  Gene Ontology Consortium: The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[13]  Luciano Serafini,et al.  Comparing formal theories of context in AI , 2004, Artif. Intell..

[14]  M A Musen,et al.  Medical Informatics: Searching for Underlying Components , 2002, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[15]  Nicolas Spyratos,et al.  Contextualization as an independent abstraction mechanism for conceptual modeling , 2007, Inf. Syst..

[16]  A. Strauss Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[17]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[18]  Alexander C. Yu,et al.  Methods in biomedical ontology , 2006, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[19]  Michael Uschold,et al.  The Enterprise Ontology , 1998, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[20]  Frederico T. Fonseca,et al.  The double role of ontologies in information science research , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[21]  Mark S. Fox,et al.  The TOVE Project Towards a Common-Sense Model of the Enterprise , 1992, IEA/AIE.

[22]  José L. V. Mejino,et al.  A reference ontology for biomedical informatics: the Foundational Model of Anatomy , 2003, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[23]  Clay Spinuzzi,et al.  The Methodology of Participatory Design , 2005 .

[24]  Chiara Ghidini,et al.  Contextual reasoning distilled , 2000, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[25]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory methodology: An overview. , 1994 .

[26]  Fausto Giunchiglia,et al.  Theories and uses of context in knowledge representation and reasoning , 2003 .

[27]  Henrik Eriksson,et al.  The evolution of Protégé: an environment for knowledge-based systems development , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[28]  He Zhang Investigating the Gap between Quantitative and Qualitative/Semi-quantitative Software Process Simulation Models: An Explorative Study , 2009, ICSP.

[29]  Stephen Morley,et al.  Cognitive-processing bias in chronic pain: a review and integration. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[30]  Kent Sandoe,et al.  Enterprise Integration , 2001 .

[31]  H. Sofia Pinto,et al.  Ontologies: How can They be Built? , 2004, Knowledge and Information Systems.

[32]  Nicolas Spyratos,et al.  A theory of contexts in information bases , 2002, Inf. Syst..

[33]  Ron Weber,et al.  Still desperately seeking the IT artifact , 2003 .

[34]  Steffen Schulze-Kremer,et al.  The Ontology of the Gene Ontology , 2003, AMIA.

[35]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  Methodologies, tools and languages for building ontologies: Where is their meeting point? , 2003, Data Knowl. Eng..

[36]  Craig E. Kuziemsky,et al.  Model Formulation: An Interdisciplinary Computer-based Information Tool for Palliative Severe Pain Management , 2008, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[37]  David E. Avison,et al.  Time to rethink health care and ICT? , 2007, CACM.