Injury events sustained in residential environments: age and physical disability as explanatory factors for differences in injury patterns in Sweden

ABSTRACT The aim is to analyze how age and physical (dis)ability jointly condition the probability of different types of injuries in residential settings, in order to identify injury countermeasures. There is a need to identify risk factors associated with injuries involving disabled people in their homes. The data include 62,674 records of unintentional injuries in the residential settings from Injury Database 2001–2015. Injuries were twice as likely to occur in residential settings, compared to other environments. Individuals with dis-abilities were more likely to be injured in their residences through falls, compared to non disabled individuals. Contusion was a more common injury type in the disabled group, while open wounds were more common in the non disabled group. Age was the most important factor for predicting fractures and the risk for fractures increased by age, while risk factors related to physical disability did not appear to play a role. The evidence is clear that people with disabilities, and older people without disabilities, would benefit from safety interventions in their home to reduce harm from falls after they have occurred. In keeping with principles to support autonomy, it is recommended that a range of passive measures be implemented to reduce injury risks.

[1]  Mikael Svensson,et al.  Modelling the cost-effectiveness of impact-absorbing flooring in Swedish residential care facilities. , 2016, European journal of public health.

[2]  J. Lundälv,et al.  Awareness and the Arguments for and against the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health among Representatives of Disability Organisations , 2015, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[3]  R. Andersson,et al.  Are national injury prevention and research efforts matching the distribution of injuries across sectors? , 2014, Injury Prevention.

[4]  H. Xiang,et al.  Injuries Among US Adults With Disabilities , 2008, Epidemiology.

[5]  J. Beamish,et al.  Development and Use of the Supportive Bathroom Features Checklist in Homes Designed for Retired Persons , 2008 .

[6]  Comment By Gregor The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities , 2006 .

[7]  J. Beamish,et al.  Development and Use of the Supportive Kitchen Features Checklist in Homes Designed for Retired Persons , 2005 .

[8]  D. Trichopoulos,et al.  Injuries among disabled children: a study from Greece , 2003, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[9]  Jörgen Lundälv,et al.  Minirapport från en forskningscirkel: Skaderisker och riskhantering i bostadsmiljön ur ett funktionshindersperspektiv. , 2016 .

[10]  Carl Bonander,et al.  Funktionsnedsättningar som riskfaktor för olycksfall och andra skador. , 2014 .

[11]  L. Stallones,et al.  Disability status: a risk factor in injury epidemiologic research. , 2014, Annals of epidemiology.

[12]  S. Marshall,et al.  Disability and home hazards and safety practices in US households. , 2012, Disability and health journal.

[13]  E. Cyarto,et al.  Outcomes from the implementation of a facility-specific evidence-based falls prevention intervention program in residential aged care. , 2012, Geriatric nursing.

[14]  A. Bueno-Cavanillas,et al.  Risk factors in falls among the elderly according to extrinsic and intrinsic precipitating causes , 2004, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[15]  J. S. Valente,et al.  Description of a Model Rural, Older Adult Injury Prevention Program for the Home , 1998 .

[16]  June P. Mead,et al.  Injury Prevention in Public Housing: Do Insurance Incentives Work? , 1998 .