Invited review: Learning from the future-A vision for dairy farms and cows in 2067.

The world's population will reach 10.4 billion in 2067, with 81% residing in Africa or Asia. Arable land available for food production will decrease to 0.15 ha per person. Temperature will increase in tropical and temperate zones, especially in the Northern Hemisphere, and this will push growing seasons and dairy farming away from arid areas and into more northern latitudes. Dairy consumption will increase because it provides essential nutrients more efficiently than many other agricultural systems. Dairy farming will become modernized in developing countries and milk production per cow will increase, doubling in countries with advanced dairying systems. Profitability of dairy farms will be the key to their sustainability. Genetic improvements will include emphasis on the coding genome and associated noncoding epigenome of cattle, and on microbiomes of dairy cattle and farmsteads. Farm sizes will increase and there will be greater lateral integration of housing and management of dairy cattle of different ages and production stages. Integrated sensors, robotics, and automation will replace much of the manual labor on farms. Managing the epigenome and microbiome will become part of routine herd management. Innovations in dairy facilities will improve the health of cows and permit expression of natural behaviors. Herds will be viewed as superorganisms, and studies of herds as observational units will lead to improvements in productivity, health, and well-being of dairy cattle, and improve the agroecology and sustainability of dairy farms. Dairy farmers in 2067 will meet the world's needs for essential nutrients by adopting technologies and practices that provide improved cow health and longevity, profitable dairy farms, and sustainable agriculture.

[1]  R. Veerkamp,et al.  Genomewide association study of methane emissions in Angus beef cattle with validation in dairy cattle. , 2016, Journal of animal science.

[2]  U. Moallem,et al.  Consistent magnitude of postpartum body weight loss within cows across lactations and the relation to reproductive performance. , 2017, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  Jakob Skoet,et al.  Milk availability: trends in production and demand and medium-term outlook , 2012 .

[4]  B. Mallard,et al.  Genetic parameters of adaptive immune response traits in Canadian Holsteins. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  D. Boichard,et al.  Sustainable dairy cattle selection in the genomic era. , 2015, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[6]  J. Donnelly,et al.  Health behaviors and weight status among urban and rural children. , 2008, Rural and remote health.

[7]  H. Steinfeld,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions from ruminant supply chains – a global life cycle assessment , 2013 .

[8]  A. Capuco,et al.  Milk yield and mammary growth effects due to increased milking frequency during early lactation. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  M. Lucy,et al.  Endocrine and metabolic mechanisms linking postpartum glucose with early embryonic and foetal development in dairy cows. , 2014, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[10]  I Bruckental,et al.  Relationship between frequent milking or suckling in early lactation and milk production of high producing dairy cows. , 1995, Journal of dairy science.

[11]  G. Archunan,et al.  1-Iodoundecane, an Estrus Indicating Urinary Chemo signal in Bovine(Bos Taurus) , 2012 .

[12]  Jana Seifert,et al.  News in livestock research — use of Omics-technologies to study the microbiota in the gastrointestinal tract of farm animals , 2014, Computational and structural biotechnology journal.

[13]  R. Rawnsley,et al.  More milk from forage: Milk production, blood metabolites, and forage intake of dairy cows grazing pasture mixtures and spatially adjacent monocultures. , 2016, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  M. Wiltbank,et al.  Relationships between fertility and postpartum changes in body condition and body weight in lactating dairy cows. , 2014, Journal of dairy science.

[15]  Max Roser,et al.  Yields and Land Use in Agriculture , 2013 .

[16]  R. Everett,et al.  Preweaning milk replacer intake and effects on long-term productivity of dairy calves. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[17]  Oliver H. Gao,et al.  The costs of increased localization for a multiple-product food supply chain: Dairy in the United States , 2011 .

[18]  R. Bruckmaier,et al.  Blood plasma traits associated with genetic merit for feed utilization in Holstein cows. , 2017, Journal of dairy science.

[19]  J. Wilkinson Re-defining efficiency of feed use by livestock. , 2011, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[20]  Sujoy B. Roy,et al.  Projecting water withdrawal and supply for future decades in the U.S. under climate change scenarios. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  D. Tilman,et al.  Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of agricultural production systems, agricultural input efficiency, and food choice , 2017 .

[22]  R. Alberio,et al.  Epigenetics and developmental programming of welfare and production traits in farm animals. , 2016, Reproduction, fertility, and development.

[23]  R. Cushman,et al.  The consequence of level of nutrition on heifer ovarian and mammary development. , 2014, Journal of animal science.

[24]  Orin C. Shanks,et al.  Community Structures of Fecal Bacteria in Cattle from Different Animal Feeding Operations , 2011, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[25]  É. Khandjian,et al.  Cumulus Cell Transcripts Transit to the Bovine Oocyte in Preparation for Maturation , 2015, Biology of reproduction.

[26]  Y. Matsui,et al.  Distinct requirements for energy metabolism in mouse primordial germ cells and their reprogramming to embryonic germ cells , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Lawrence G. Oates,et al.  Nitrogen Fertilization Effects on Productivity and Nitrogen Loss in Three Grass-Based Perennial Bioenergy Cropping Systems , 2016, PloS one.

[28]  A. Malafosse,et al.  Reproductive Technologies and Genomic Selection in Cattle , 2010, Veterinary medicine international.

[29]  F. Fritschi,et al.  Dual-Use Bioenergy-Livestock Feed Potential of Giant Miscanthus, Giant Reed, and Miscane , 2017 .

[30]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Symposium review: Possibilities in an age of genomics: The future of selection indices. , 2017, Journal of dairy science.

[31]  J. Weller,et al.  Invited review: A perspective on the future of genomic selection in dairy cattle. , 2017, Journal of dairy science.

[32]  D. F. Costa,et al.  Supplementation of cattle fed tropical grasses with microalgae increases microbial protein production and average daily gain. , 2016, Journal of animal science.

[33]  B. Mallard,et al.  A genome-wide association study of immune response traits in Canadian Holstein cattle , 2014, BMC Genomics.

[34]  S. Sharma,et al.  Can chilling tolerance of C4 photosynthesis in Miscanthus be transferred to sugarcane? , 2016 .

[35]  R. Bicalho,et al.  Diversity and Succession of Bacterial Communities in the Uterine Fluid of Postpartum Metritic, Endometritic and Healthy Dairy Cows , 2012, PloS one.

[36]  P. Lonergan,et al.  Maternal Undernutrition in Cows Impairs Ovarian and Cardiovascular Systems in Their Offspring1 , 2013, Biology of reproduction.

[37]  D O'Brien,et al.  Relating the carbon footprint of milk from Irish dairy farms to economic performance. , 2015, Journal of dairy science.

[38]  E. Borell,et al.  Stress, behaviour and reproductive performance in female cattle and pigs , 2007, Hormones and Behavior.

[39]  Itzhak Mizrahi,et al.  Potential Role of the Bovine Rumen Microbiome in Modulating Milk Composition and Feed Efficiency , 2014, PloS one.

[40]  M. Conti,et al.  Maternal mRNAs with distinct 3′ UTRs define the temporal pattern of Ccnb1 synthesis during mouse oocyte meiotic maturation , 2017, Genes & development.

[41]  M. Van Amburgh,et al.  Effects of preweaning nutrient intake in the developing mammary parenchymal tissue. , 2017, Journal of dairy science.

[42]  Ruud B.M. Huirne,et al.  Identifying and ranking attributes that determine sustainability in Dutch dairy farming , 2005 .

[43]  S. Bordenstein,et al.  Rethinking heritability of the microbiome , 2015, Science.

[44]  P. Smith,et al.  Mitigating climate change: the role of domestic livestock. , 2010, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[45]  M. Goddard,et al.  Novel strategies to minimize progeny inbreeding while maximizing genetic gain using genomic information. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[46]  B. A. Wadsworth,et al.  Machine-learning-based calving prediction from activity, lying, and ruminating behaviors in dairy cattle. , 2017, Journal of dairy science.

[47]  J. Bruinsma,et al.  World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision , 2012 .

[48]  J. D. Armstrong,et al.  Determinants of estrous behavior in lactating Holstein cows. , 1986, Journal of dairy science.

[49]  J. Ireland,et al.  A single ultrasound determination of ≥25 follicles ≥3 mm in diameter in dairy heifers is predictive of a reduced productive herd life. , 2017, Journal of dairy science.

[50]  D. Boichard,et al.  Efficiency of multi-breed genomic selection for dairy cattle breeds with different sizes of reference population. , 2014, Journal of dairy science.

[51]  Amelia F Darrouzet-Nardi,et al.  Carrying capacity of U.S. agricultural land: Ten diet scenarios , 2016 .

[52]  P. Lonergan,et al.  Effect of breed, plane of nutrition and age on growth, scrotal development, metabolite concentrations and on systemic gonadotropin and testosterone concentrations following a GnRH challenge in young dairy bulls. , 2017, Theriogenology.

[53]  J. Macdonald,et al.  Milk Production Continues Shifting to Large-Scale Farms , 2014 .

[54]  E. L. Larimore,et al.  Postweaning nutritional programming of ovarian development in beef heifers. , 2015, Journal of animal science.

[55]  D. Bauman,et al.  The Potential Impact of Animal Science Research on Global Maternal and Child Nutrition and Health: A Landscape Review12 , 2017, Advances in nutrition.

[56]  C. Ané,et al.  Comparison of bulk-tank standard plate count and somatic cell count for Wisconsin dairy farms in three size categories. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[57]  H. Dobson,et al.  What is stress, and how does it affect reproduction? , 2000, Animal reproduction science.

[58]  J. Cole,et al.  Genomic selection for producer-recorded health event data in US dairy cattle. , 2014, Journal of dairy science.

[59]  M. Schlather,et al.  A reaction norm sire model to study the effect of metabolic challenge in early lactation on the functional longevity of dairy cows. , 2017, Journal of dairy science.

[60]  J. Bromfield,et al.  Lipopolysaccharide Reduces the Primordial Follicle Pool in the Bovine Ovarian Cortex Ex Vivo and in the Murine Ovary In Vivo1 , 2013, Biology of reproduction.

[61]  K. Weigel,et al.  Harnessing the genetics of the modern dairy cow to continue improvements in feed efficiency. , 2016, Journal of dairy science.

[62]  T. Sonstegard,et al.  The SLICK hair locus derived from Senepol cattle confers thermotolerance to intensively managed lactating Holstein cows. , 2014, Journal of dairy science.

[63]  D. Prabhakaran,et al.  Dietary Intake and Rural-Urban Migration in India: A Cross-Sectional Study , 2011, PloS one.

[64]  G. Smith,et al.  Low numbers of ovarian follicles ≥3 mm in diameter are associated with low fertility in dairy cows. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[65]  D. Yáñez-Ruiz,et al.  Manipulating rumen microbiome and fermentation through interventions during early life: a review , 2015, Front. Microbiol..

[66]  Torsten Hemme,et al.  Status and prospects for smallholder milk production: a global perspective. , 2010 .

[67]  Paul M. VanRaden,et al.  Changes in genetic selection differentials and generation intervals in US Holstein dairy cattle as a result of genomic selection , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.