Flood loss modelling with FLF-IT: a new flood loss function for Italian residential structures

Abstract. The damage triggered by different flood events costs the Italian economy millions of euros each year. This cost is likely to increase in the future due to climate variability and economic development. In order to avoid or reduce such significant financial losses, risk management requires tools which can provide a reliable estimate of potential flood impacts across the country. Flood loss functions are an internationally accepted method for estimating physical flood damage in urban areas. In this study, we derived a new flood loss function for Italian residential structures (FLF-IT), on the basis of empirical damage data collected from a recent flood event in the region of Emilia-Romagna. The function was developed based on a new Australian approach (FLFA), which represents the confidence limits that exist around the parameterized functional depth–damage relationship. After model calibration, the performance of the model was validated for the prediction of loss ratios and absolute damage values. It was also contrasted with an uncalibrated relative model with frequent usage in Europe. In this regard, a three-fold cross-validation procedure was carried out over the empirical sample to measure the range of uncertainty from the actual damage data. The predictive capability has also been studied for some sub-classes of water depth. The validation procedure shows that the newly derived function performs well (no bias and only 10 % mean absolute error), especially when the water depth is high. Results of these validation tests illustrate the importance of model calibration. The advantages of the FLF-IT model over other Italian models include calibration with empirical data, consideration of the epistemic uncertainty of data, and the ability to change parameters based on building practices across Italy.

[1]  S. Djordjević,et al.  Urban flood impact assessment: A state-of-the-art review , 2015 .

[2]  H. Kreibich,et al.  Influence of flood frequency on residential building losses , 2010 .

[3]  Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts,et al.  Development of flood exposure in the Netherlands during the 20th and 21st century , 2011 .

[4]  Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts,et al.  Potential of semi-structural and non-structural adaptation strategies to reduce future flood risk: case study for the Meuse , 2012 .

[5]  H. Moel,et al.  How are flood risk estimates affected by the choice of return-periods? , 2011 .

[6]  Daniela Molinari,et al.  On the modeling of significance for flood damage assessment , 2014 .

[7]  Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts,et al.  Climate Change Impacts on pricing Long-Term Flood Insurance: A Comprehensive Study for the Netherlands , 2011 .

[8]  B. Merz,et al.  Development and evaluation of FLEMOps - a new Flood Loss Estimation MOdel for the private sector , 2008 .

[9]  A. Gissing,et al.  Accounting for variability in commercial flood damage estimation , 2004 .

[10]  B. Merz,et al.  METHODS FOR THE EVALUATION OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT FLOOD LOSSES , 2008 .

[11]  Bruno Merz,et al.  Review article "Assessment of economic flood damage" , 2010 .

[12]  Mohammad Karamouz,et al.  Flood Damage Estimation , 2018 .

[13]  Ming-Daw Su,et al.  Application of geographic weighted regression to establish flood-damage functions reflecting spatial variation , 2019, Water SA.

[14]  Tuan Ngo,et al.  Development and evaluation of FLFAcs – A new Flood Loss Function for Australian commercial structures , 2016 .

[15]  Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler,et al.  Increasing stress on disaster-risk finance due to large floods , 2014 .

[16]  N. Voulvoulis,et al.  Flood risk assessment for infrastructure networks , 2014 .

[17]  Nicola Berni,et al.  Ex post damage assessment: an Italian experience , 2014 .

[18]  Bruno Merz,et al.  Multi-variate flood damage assessment: a tree-based data-mining approach , 2013 .

[19]  B. Merz,et al.  Flood damage and influencing factors: New insights from the August 2002 flood in Germany , 2005 .

[20]  Annegret H. Thieken,et al.  Review article: assessing the costs of natural hazards - state of the art and knowledge gaps , 2013 .

[21]  L. Feyen,et al.  Global warming increases the frequency of river floods in Europe , 2015 .

[22]  Bruno Merz,et al.  How useful are complex flood damage models? , 2014 .

[23]  Alessandro Dal Palù,et al.  GPU-enhanced Finite Volume Shallow Water solver for fast flood simulations , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[24]  Sven Fuchs,et al.  Editorial for the special issue: vulnerability to natural hazards—the challenge of integration , 2011 .

[25]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Flood risk assessment , 2004 .

[26]  E E Koks,et al.  Integrated Direct and Indirect Flood Risk Modeling: Development and Sensitivity Analysis , 2015, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[27]  Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts,et al.  Regional disaster impact analysis: comparing Input-Output and Computable General Equilibrium models , 2015 .

[28]  Will Lehman,et al.  An Empirical, Functional approach to Depth Damages , 2016 .

[29]  Guido Nigrelli,et al.  Application of a model to the evaluation of flood damage , 2009, GeoInformatica.

[30]  Tonje Grahn,et al.  Damage assessment of lake floods: Insured damage to private property during two lake floods in Sweden 2000/2001 , 2014 .

[31]  T. Chai,et al.  Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? – Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature , 2014 .

[32]  Tuan Ngo,et al.  An Assessment of the Effectiveness of Tree-Based Models for Multi-Variate Flood Damage Assessment in Australia , 2016 .

[33]  Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts,et al.  Evaluating the effect of flood damage-reducing measures: a case study of the unembanked area of Rotterdam, the Netherlands , 2013, Regional Environmental Change.

[34]  Peter Salamon,et al.  Modelling the socio-economic impact of river floods in Europe , 2016 .

[35]  J. Chatterton,et al.  The Benefits of Flood and Coastal Risk Management: A Handbook of Assessment Techniques , 2005 .

[36]  P. Bubeck,et al.  How reliable are projections of future flood damage , 2011 .

[37]  S. Kaplan,et al.  On The Quantitative Definition of Risk , 1981 .

[38]  A. Thieken,et al.  Adaptability and transferability of flood loss functions in residential areas , 2013 .

[39]  Peter Wynn Flood Damaged Property: A Guide to Repair , 2005 .

[40]  T. Glade,et al.  Improvement of vulnerability curves using data from extreme events: debris flow event in South Tyrol , 2012, Natural Hazards.

[41]  H. Kreibich,et al.  Assessment of damage caused by high groundwater inundation , 2008 .

[42]  Timothy Neale,et al.  Navigating scientific uncertainty in wildfire and flood risk mitigation: A qualitative review , 2015 .

[43]  Bruno Merz,et al.  Application and validation of FLEMOcs – a flood-loss estimation model for the commercial sector , 2010 .

[44]  Ling Liu,et al.  Encyclopedia of Database Systems , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[45]  Tuan Ngo,et al.  Calibration and validation of FLFA rs -- a new flood loss function for Australian residential structures , 2016 .

[46]  Jaroslav Mysiak,et al.  Improving flood damage assessment models in Italy , 2015, Natural Hazards.

[47]  Sven Fuchs,et al.  Micro-sized enterprises: vulnerability to flash floods , 2016, Natural Hazards.

[48]  Edward A. McBean,et al.  A critical analysis of residential flood damage estimation curves , 1986 .

[49]  Miroslav Nastev,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of flood damage estimates: A case study in Fredericton, New Brunswick , 2015 .

[50]  D. I. Smith Flood damage estimation - A review of urban stage-damage curves and loss functions , 1994 .

[51]  Stéphane Hallegatte,et al.  An Adaptive Regional Input‐Output Model and its Application to the Assessment of the Economic Cost of Katrina , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[52]  L. Bouwer,et al.  Effect of spatial adaptation measures on flood risk in the coastal area of Flanders , 2012 .

[53]  B. Merz,et al.  Development of FLEMOcs – a new model for the estimation of flood losses in the commercial sector , 2010 .

[54]  Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts,et al.  Comparative flood damage model assessment: towards a European approach , 2012 .

[55]  Jaap C. J. Kwadijk,et al.  Overstromingsrisico's in Nederland in een veranderend klimaat: Verwachtingen, schattingen en berekeningen voor het project Nederland Later , 2007 .

[56]  Sebastiaan N. Jonkman,et al.  Loss of life estimation in flood risk assessment; theory and applications , 2007 .

[57]  P. Bubeck,et al.  Changes in future flood risk due to climate and development in a Dutch polder area , 2010 .

[58]  A. R. Scorzini,et al.  Flood damage curves: new insights from the 2010 flood in Veneto, Italy , 2017 .

[59]  R. H. Nafari,et al.  Results comparison and model validation for flood loss functions in Australian geographical conditions , 2015 .

[60]  Paolo Mignosa,et al.  Simulation of the January 2014 flood on the Secchia River using a fast and high-resolution 2D parallel shallow-water numerical scheme , 2015, Natural Hazards.

[61]  J. Barredo Normalised flood losses in Europe: 1970-2006 , 2009 .