Concurrent visual and tactile steady-state evoked potentials index allocation of inter-modal attention: A frequency-tagging study

We investigated effects of inter-modal attention on concurrent visual and tactile stimulus processing by means of stimulus-driven oscillatory brain responses, so-called steady-state evoked potentials (SSEPs). To this end, we frequency-tagged a visual (7.5Hz) and a tactile stimulus (20Hz) and participants were cued, on a trial-by-trial basis, to attend to either vision or touch to perform a detection task in the cued modality. SSEPs driven by the stimulation comprised stimulus frequency-following (i.e. fundamental frequency) as well as frequency-doubling (i.e. second harmonic) responses. We observed that inter-modal attention to vision increased amplitude and phase synchrony of the fundamental frequency component of the visual SSEP while the second harmonic component showed an increase in phase synchrony, only. In contrast, inter-modal attention to touch increased SSEP amplitude of the second harmonic but not of the fundamental frequency, while leaving phase synchrony unaffected in both responses. Our results show that inter-modal attention generally influences concurrent stimulus processing in vision and touch, thus, extending earlier audio-visual findings to a visuo-tactile stimulus situation. The pattern of results, however, suggests differences in the neural implementation of inter-modal attentional influences on visual vs. tactile stimulus processing.

[1]  Marcia Grabowecky,et al.  Differential Roles of Frequency-following and Frequency-doubling Visual Responses Revealed by Evoked Neural Harmonics , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  E. Schröger,et al.  ERP effects of intermodal attention and cross-modal links in spatial attention. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[3]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Early visual and auditory processing rely on modality-specific attentional resources , 2013, NeuroImage.

[4]  Marcia Grabowecky,et al.  Attention induces synchronization-based response gain in steady-state visual evoked potentials , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Sustained selective intermodal attention modulates processing of language-like stimuli , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  J Artieda,et al.  Topography of cortical activation differs for fundamental and harmonic frequencies of the steady-state visual-evoked responses. An EEG and PET H215O study. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  J. Pernier,et al.  Oscillatory γ-Band (30–70 Hz) Activity Induced by a Visual Search Task in Humans , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Selective attention to stimulus location modulates the steady-state visual evoked potential. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Philipp Berens,et al.  CircStat: AMATLABToolbox for Circular Statistics , 2009, Journal of Statistical Software.

[10]  Paolo Toffanin,et al.  by steady-state responses in auditory-visual divided attention , 2009 .

[11]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Human Neuroscience , 2022 .

[12]  Robert A. Frazor,et al.  Standing Waves and Traveling Waves Distinguish Two Circuits in Visual Cortex , 2007, Neuron.

[13]  Kazumichi Matsumiya,et al.  Time Courses of Attentional Modulation in Neural Amplification and Synchronization Measured with Steady-state Visual-evoked Potentials , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  Jon Driver,et al.  Cross-Modal Interactions between Audition, Touch, and Vision in Endogenous Spatial Attention: ERP Evidence on Preparatory States and Sensory Modulations , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Sustained spatial attention to vibration is mediated in primary somatosensory cortex , 2007, NeuroImage.

[16]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[17]  J. Pernier,et al.  Oscillatory gamma-band (30-70 Hz) activity induced by a visual search task in humans. , 1997, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[18]  R. Kakigi,et al.  Dynamics of within-, inter-, and cross-modal attentional modulation. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Intermodal Auditory, Visual, and Tactile Attention Modulates Early Stages of Neural Processing , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  Yijun Wang,et al.  A Brain-Computer Interface Based on Multi-Modal Attention , 2007, 2007 3rd International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering.

[21]  S. A. Hillyard,et al.  Sustained division of the attentional spotlight , 2003, Nature.

[22]  M. Breakspear,et al.  Multi-frequency phase locking in human somatosensory cortex. , 2011, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[23]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[24]  B. Rockstroh,et al.  Statistical control of artifacts in dense array EEG/MEG studies. , 2000, Psychophysiology.