Assessing the tolerability and efficacy of first-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic HER2−ve breast cancer

Background In metastatic breast cancer (MBC), there is no consensus regarding the optimal regimen sequence and whether adults >65 years old (OA) are at increased risk from chemotherapy toxicity. Treatment decisions are often driven by the ability to tolerate treatment and maintain the quality of life. This study was designed to assess current practice in an oncology hospital in the UK. Methods Retrospective data were collected about treatments used for 87 OA with MBC in a single centre between 2009 and 2016 to assess the tolerability and efficacy of first-line chemotherapy. Student’s T-tests and Kaplan-Meier statistical methods were applied. Results 70% of patients were commenced on standard dose (SD) of chemotherapy; 84% (21/25) of the anthracycline group (AG), 65% (20/31) of the capecitabine group (CG), 48% (10/21) of the taxane group (TG) and 100% (10/10) of other agents. 32% of patients had dose reductions; 16% in AG, 19% in TG and 58% in CG. Overall 30% of patients received six cycles of SD of chemotherapy; 36% in AG, 29% in CG and 14% in TG. 23% of patients suffered ≥grade 3 toxicity; 28% in AG, 29% in CG and 10% in TG. There were four treatment-related deaths; two in AG and one in both CG and TG. 61% of the CG received 6+ cycles with a mean on treatment time of 445 days (1–2,150). There was no statistical significance in progression- free survival (PFS) between groups. The median PFS for all patients was 244 days (87–381). Performance status, haemoglobin and estimated glomerular filtration rates prior to starting chemotherapy were all useful in predicting PFS. Conclusions A relevant number of patients required dose reduction but dose-reduced chemotherapy was tolerated well. Anthracycline-based regimens were used in patients who had not received adjuvant chemotherapy. Capecitabine required the most dose reductions. Taxanes were generally started at reduced doses, resulting in fewer grade 3+ toxicities. As well as age, underlying physiological reserve, current performance status and co-morbidities should guide physicians who should consider lower starting doses in OA and recognise that dose reductions may be required to improve tolerability. The PFS of all regimens were similar in this study. This study highlights the need for further research to define the optimal first-line chemotherapy and starting dose in OA with MBC.

[1]  C. Tournigand,et al.  Prognostic value of the G8 and modified-G8 screening tools for multidimensional health problems in older patients with cancer. , 2017, European journal of cancer.

[2]  K. Vistisen,et al.  Efficacy and toxicity of adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with colorectal cancer: the ACCORE study , 2016, ESMO Open.

[3]  H. Wildiers,et al.  Screening tools for multidimensional health problems warranting a geriatric assessment in older cancer patients: an update on SIOG recommendations†. , 2015, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[4]  H. Wildiers,et al.  International Society of Geriatric Oncology consensus on geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  J. Nortier,et al.  A randomized phase III study comparing pegylated liposomal doxorubicin with capecitabine as first-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer: results of the OMEGA study of the Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group BOOG. , 2014, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[6]  A. Hurria,et al.  Determining chemotherapy tolerance in older patients with cancer. , 2013, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[7]  G. Lyman,et al.  Predicting the risk of chemotherapy toxicity in older patients: The Chemotherapy Risk Assessment Scale for High‐Age Patients (CRASH) score , 2012, Cancer.

[8]  Val Gebski,et al.  Capecitabine versus classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil as first-line chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  Supriya G Mohile,et al.  Predicting chemotherapy toxicity in older adults with cancer: a prospective multicenter study. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  W. Gradishar,et al.  Significantly longer progression-free survival with nab-paclitaxel compared with docetaxel as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  H. Wildiers,et al.  Renal insufficiency in elderly cancer patients: International Society of Geriatric Oncology clinical practice recommendations. , 2007, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[12]  G. D'aiuto,et al.  Is epirubicin effective in first-line chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) after an epirubicin-containing adjuvant treatment? A single centre phase III trial , 2006, British Journal of Cancer.

[13]  B. Overmoyer,et al.  Randomized phase III study of docetaxel compared with paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  S. Chan,et al.  Phase III trial of liposomal doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide compared with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer. , 2004, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[15]  S. Nag,et al.  Global phase III study of gemcitabine plus paclitaxel (GT) vs. paclitaxel (T) as frontline therapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC): First report of overall surviva. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  S. Culine,et al.  Multicentre, phase II study evaluating capecitabine monotherapy in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer. , 2004, European journal of cancer.

[17]  M. Piccart,et al.  Doxorubicin and paclitaxel versus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10961 Multicenter Phase III Trial. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  F. Cavalli,et al.  Burdens and benefits of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil and tamoxifen for elderly patients with breast cancer: the International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial VII. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  C. Focan,et al.  Dose-response relationship of epirubicin-based first-line chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer: a prospective randomized trial. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  L. Case,et al.  Chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer in the elderly. The Piedmont Oncology Association experience [see comment]. , 1992, JAMA.

[21]  F. Hara,et al.  Taxanes versus S-1 as the first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (SELECT BC): an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised phase 3 trial. , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[22]  E. Perez,et al.  RIBBON-1: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab (B) for first-line treatment of HER2-negative locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (MBC). , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  Lyndsay Harris,et al.  Liposome‐encapsulated doxorubicin compared with conventional doxorubicin in a randomized multicenter trial as first‐line therapy of metastatic breast carcinoma , 2002, Cancer.

[24]  C. Begg,et al.  Are the elderly predisposed to toxicity from cancer chemotherapy? An investigation using data from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. , 1980, Cancer clinical trials.